Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

fish meal

Fresh fish for high quality fish meal

Published: July 7, 2009
By: Dr. Christian Lückstädt and Dr. Kai Kühlmann
Tests prove the effect of potassium diformate on the quality of fish under tropical conditions
Almost one-third of the world fish harvest is not used for direct human consumption, but is converted into fish meal or fish oil for further application in animal feed. Of the 75 million tons of fish about 25 million tonnes is therefore handled and processed in other ways than fresh, frozen, smoked or canned (Balios, 2003).
The supply of huge volumes of high quality fish meal is necessary to supply the aquaculture industry, which has been growing with around 8.8% annually since the 1950ies (FAO, 2007). It was recently estimated that 25% of the produced fish meal world-wide comes from usage of waste from the fish processing sector (FeedInfo, 2009).
The world-wide supply of fish meal is presently stable at 6 to 6.5 million t a year. On the other hand the percentage of high quality fish meal of the total amount of fish meal is expected to grow from 8% to 50% during the next 30 years (Hydro Norway, 2000).
However, according to an IntraFish.com report (2001), access to premium quality fish meal, without dehydration damage to proteins and / or rotting which make the final product rancid, is still limited.
Acid preservation of fish and fish viscera to produce fish silage has been a common practice (Lückstädt, 2007) and its final product has been widely used in fish feeds with reported beneficial effects (Gildbert and Raa, 1977; Åsgård and Austreng, 1981). It is a widely used method in many European countries to preserve fish-by-products as well as freshly caught "industrial fish" for further fish meal or fish oil production with formic acid, acetic acid or potassium diformate in order to prolong fishing time or to extend the storage duration of those fish.
The present studies examined the effectiveness of a liquid blend of potassium diformate, antioxidant and corrosion inhibitor (FISHFORM) as a preservative for sardines, caught in the Indian Ocean, under Asian fish storage conditions.
During the sardine preservation a storage temperature of 12°C was chosen, which reflects the situation of the South East Asian fish storage conditions (on ice) on modern fishing vessels. The potassium diformate blend was added in one concentration (0.40%) next to a negative control. Samples (3 replicates) of the fish were taken after 24 h, 48 h and 72 hours storage time, for Total Volatile Nitrogen (TVN), histamine and dry matter content of fish.
TVN is used as a criterion for the freshness of fish raw material (Haaland and Njaa, 1987). This value in the fish before processing is known as the most important quality criteria for raw industrial fish. Fishermen are paid according to the measured TVN level when landing the catch at the fishmeal factories.
The main constituents of TVN are trimethylamine and ammonia. Its amount increases with time of storage in the unfrozen state. Trimethylamine originates from bacterial decomposition The presence in fish is therefore taken as an indication for bacterial growth, while the ammonia comes from decomposition of amino acids - thus reducing the quality of the available protein. Levels of mainly 40 mg TVN per 100 g fish mass are regarded by the industry as limits for a good quality fish meal for instance. Furthermore biogenic amines, like Histamine, are formed if the bacterial degradation of protein (amino acids) has started and is therefore an important criterion for the quality of the fish too.
Histamine, for instance, is formed during the bacterial degradation of Histidine, which is an essential amino acid in fish nutrition. Contamination with histamine can cause food poisoning and allergic reactions (Diel et al., 1997).
Finally, the dry matter content (DM) of fish is an important economic criterion, since it indicates how much fish meal can be produced with the fish raw material.
The total Volatile Nitrogen values in the negative control increased rapidly and exceeded the above mentioned 40 mg already after 48 hours at 12°C storage temperature. The fast TVN development was significantly delayed by the addition of the potassium diformate blend. After 48 h the TVN-level in the group treated with FISHFORM was only half compared to the negative control (see table 1).
Table 1: Quality parameters of sardines for fish meal production (TVN and dry matter) stored with or without FISHFORM (potassium diformate blend) at different storage times (at 12°C)
Storage time (h)
24
48
72
KDF
TVN (mg/100g)
DM (%)
TVN (mg/100g)
DM (%)
TVN (mg/100g)
DM (%)
0.0%
26.0a
24.9
59.4b
24.3
52.4b
26.0
0.4%
25.2a
26.1
30.2a
24.9
37.5a
26.3
Values with a different superscript differ significantly (P<0.05)
 
Fresh fish for high quality fish meal - Image 1
Figure 1: Good quality Sardines for further fish meal production
 
Furthermore, the analysed values of histamine after 48 hours of storage in the negative control clearly prove the bacterial degradation of non-treated fish, while the amount of histamine in the preserved fish was nearly 3 times lower - indicating an improved quality of the fish raw material (see figure 2).
 
Fresh fish for high quality fish meal - Image 2
Figure 2: Development of histamine levels (average ± SD) after 48 h of storage with or without FISHFORM
 
Finally, the average dry matter content over the whole experimental period was in the non-treated fish 25.1%, while the fish preserved with FISHFORM had an average dry matter content of 25.8% - this is a significant increase in dry matter of nearly 2.8% and would lead to a more optimized fish meal production.
The determined results clearly indicate that due to the addition of FISHFORM the quality of the stored fish can be improved and also the yield of fish meal can be increased. The higher quality of the produced fish meal, as well as the larger yield, will allow a more economic and sustaining use of the limited resource fish meal.
 
Related topics:
Authors:
Christian Lückstädt
ADDCON
Kai-Jens Kühlmann
Trouw Nutrition
Recommend
Comment
Share
Christian Lückstädt
ADDCON
14 de julio de 2009

Dear Dr. Mashhadi,
your answer refers to a recent study done by Mikkelsen et al. 2009 which showed encouraging results with KDF on controlling mortality in poultry infected with necrotic enteritis.
However this study was done with a crystalline feed additive containing 97[percent] potassium diformate (KDF), while the afore mentioned study refers to a liquid blend containing KDF which is meant to treat fish for further fish meal production.
Therefore there are two different ways of inclusion and two different products - one into the raw material (fish meal only), the other one directly into the feed.
I hope this answer clarifies your comments.

Lückstädt, ADDCON

Recommend
Reply
Christian Lückstädt
ADDCON
8 de julio de 2009

Dear Amr,
thank you for your comment regarding the article on the use of potassium diformate (KDF) in the preservation of raw fish.
The substance was extensively tested on further effects in fish as well as in human. To start with the human side first - potassium diformate got the EU approval as preservative for raw fish which is meant for fish meal production (EC no. 237a). In order to achieve this approval, several tests had to be carried out - including toxicological studies involving the safety of humans hence the safety of the consumer is given!
On the other hand - you are right with potential effects of animals consuming fish meal treated with potassium diformate KDF. Christiansen & Lückstädt (2008) published a study on the performance enhancement in Salmon fed with fishmeal treated with KDF, which showed improved growth and feed conversion. Furhter studies using KDF as direct feed additive in fish (for instance tilapia) were recently published by Zhou et al 2009 and Ng et al. 2009, both showing beneficial effects on tilapia performance. A review on the use of potassium diformate, as well as other organic acids or their salts was published by Lückstädt in 2008 (The use of acidifiers in fish nutrition). So to make the answer short: there are certainly beneficial effects of acids in fish diets as well as in pig and poultry...

Recommend
Reply
Dr.Iftikhar Ahmad Mashhadi
16 de julio de 2010

Dear Lückstädt, ADDCON
Thanks a lot for your valuable information about fish meal

Recommend
Reply
Dr.Iftikhar Ahmad Mashhadi
13 de julio de 2009

The Article: Fresh fish for high quality fish meal ia a valuable information but the duration of critical storage period is an important factor as KDF holds promise as an agent to control necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens and it may be possible to enhance the efficacy of KDF by manipulating dietary properties that may influence the dissociation kinetics of KDF in the gut.

Recommend
Reply
Amr Said
Amr Said
8 de julio de 2009

Hi,
i find this article avery good start,but what about the effect of formate on fishmeal
and the fish that will be fed this fish meal
i think fomate has got direct effect on bacteria so can it also affect fish and after that human

Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Aquaculture
Chris Beattie
Chris Beattie
MSD - Merck Animal Health
Global Head of Aquaculture at Merck Animal Health
United States
Jorge Arias
Jorge Arias
Alltech
United States
Gary J. Burtle
Gary J. Burtle
University of Georgia
University of Georgia
Associate Professor/Extension Specialist
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.