Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

Associations between carcass tail lesions and other welfare conditions and the performance of negative behaviours in pigs

Published: February 16, 2024
By: N. Van Staaveren 1,2; B. Doyle 1*; A. Hanlon 2; L. Boyle 1 / 1 Pig Development Department, Teagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy; 2 School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Summary

Keywords: Abnormal behaviour, Carcass tail lesions, Welfare lesions

Introduction:
Tail lesions are outcomes of tail biting behaviour and reflective of impaired welfare in pigs. It is possible that tail biting is associated with other behavioural problems such as ear- or flank biting. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate the potential of carcass tail lesions to reflect other behavioural problems on farms and thereby act as an ‘iceberg indicator’ for pig welfare.
Materials and Methods:
Welfare assessments were conducted on 31 integrated pig farms by observing 18 randomly selected pens of 1st and 2nd stage weaner and finisher pigs (6 pens per stage). Pens were observed for 10 min and the number of pigs with tail, ear, flank and skin lesions was recorded. All occurrence behaviour sampling was used to record frequency of tail-, ear-, and flank biting (5 min). The average percentage of pigs in a pen affected by welfare lesions was calculated, as was the average frequency of behaviours per pig, in each production stage (mean ± SE). One batch of pigs from each farm was observed at the slaughterline and carcass tail lesions were scored according to severity (0 – 4). An average carcass tail lesion score for each batch was calculated. Spearman rank correlations were calculated between average carcass tail lesion score and the measured welfare conditions and behaviours.
Results:
All lesion types were observed in the 1st stage pens (tail: 5.4 ± 1.0%; ear: 9.4 ± 1.7%; flank: 0.4 ± 0.4%; skin: 4.8 ± 0.7% of pigs affected). The percentage of pigs with tail lesions in 2nd stage weaner pens was 6.2 ± 0.5% with the highest prevalence recorded in finisher stage pens (11.0 ± 0.8%). Similarly, flank lesions were more highly prevalent in 2nd stage weaner and finisher pens (1.4 ± 0.5% and 2.3 ± 0.5%, respectively). Ear lesions were most prevalent in 2nd stage weaner pens (15.4 ± 2.8%) with the lowest prevalence seen in the finisher pens (7.1 ± 1.3%). On average 204.3 ± 25.8 carcasses were scored per batch and average carcass tail lesion score was 0.83 ± 0.02 (range: 0.53 – 1.26). No correlations were found between carcass tail lesion score and the prevalence of tail/ear/flank lesions or frequency of tail/ear/flank biting behaviour for any of the production stages.
Conclusion:
The high prevalence of ear and tail lesions throughout the production stages raises concern for pig welfare. No associations were found between carcass tail lesion scores and the abnormal biting behaviours or consequent lesions, suggesting that this measure might not be a useful ‘iceberg indicator’ for these aspects of pig welfare.
Disclosure of Interest: None Declared.
      
Published in the proceedings of the International Pig Veterinary Society Congress – IPVS2016. For information on the event, past and future editions, check out https://ipvs2024.com/.
Content from the event:
Related topics:
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.