Lactating Dairy Cows Fed Varying Levels of Total Mixed Ration and Pasture
Performance of Lactating Dairy Cows Fed Varying Levels of Total Mixed Ration and Pasture
Published: September 15, 2010
By: Vivek Fellner, Ronaldo E Vibart, Joseph C Burns, G. B Huntington and J. T Green (Department of Animal Science and USDA–ARS and Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, USA)
The effect of feeding an all-TMR diet v. an all pasture diet to dairy cows has been examined previously (Kolver & Muller, 1998 ; Tucker et al. 2001). Others have examined the merit of including supplemental concentrate to cows on pasture (White et al. 2002; Fontaneli et al. 2005) as well as some combination of TMR plus pasture (Soriano et al. 2001 ; Bargo et al. 2002). Our present study was designed to evaluate lactation performance when replacing incremental amounts of TMR with forage from pasture.
To our knowledge, there are no published studies that examine animal performance under increasing TMR replacement with pasture. Research from the eastern USA comparing dairy confinement systems with pasture-based systems (with or without supplementation) has consistently shown reduced dry matter intake (DMI), milk production and body condition scores (BCS) for pasture-based dairying (Kolver & Muller, 1998; Soriano et al. 2001; Bargo et al. 2002 ; White et al. 2002; Fontaneli et al. 2005). Our objectives were to determine (1) the effect of increasing the proportion of forage from pasture on pasture and total intakes and (2) the level of pasture inclusion in TMR diets to optimize feed efficiency and lactation performance.
Two independent experiments were conducted to monitor the effects of fall pasture (Experiment 1) and spring pasture (Experiment 2) on intakes, milk yield, and milk composition.
To our knowledge, there are no published studies that examine animal performance under increasing TMR replacement with pasture. Research from the eastern USA comparing dairy confinement systems with pasture-based systems (with or without supplementation) has consistently shown reduced dry matter intake (DMI), milk production and body condition scores (BCS) for pasture-based dairying (Kolver & Muller, 1998; Soriano et al. 2001; Bargo et al. 2002 ; White et al. 2002; Fontaneli et al. 2005). Our objectives were to determine (1) the effect of increasing the proportion of forage from pasture on pasture and total intakes and (2) the level of pasture inclusion in TMR diets to optimize feed efficiency and lactation performance.
Two independent experiments were conducted to monitor the effects of fall pasture (Experiment 1) and spring pasture (Experiment 2) on intakes, milk yield, and milk composition.
Materials and Methods
Two separate, 8-week experiments (each using 30 Holstein cows) were conducted to evaluate total and pasture DMI and lactation performance from cows fed different combinations of TMR and pasture. Experiment 1 evaluated pasture grazed in the fall and Experiment 2, with a different set of cows, evaluated pasture grazed in the spring. Unless stated otherwise, materials and methods common to both experiments are described below.
Two separate, 8-week experiments (each using 30 Holstein cows) were conducted to evaluate total and pasture DMI and lactation performance from cows fed different combinations of TMR and pasture. Experiment 1 evaluated pasture grazed in the fall and Experiment 2, with a different set of cows, evaluated pasture grazed in the spring. Unless stated otherwise, materials and methods common to both experiments are described below.
Cows and treatments
The experiments were conducted at the North Carolina State University Lake Wheeler Dairy Educational Unit, Raleigh NC, USA. Thirty lactating Holstein cows were blocked by milk yield, parity and days in milk (DIM). Cows were randomly assigned to either a nutritionally balanced TMR fed ad libitum (100 : 00, n= 6, full nutrient positive control, no access to pasture) or one of the following three formulated partial mixed rations (PMR) with access to pasture (n= 8) and targeted to be (1) 85% TMR and 15% pasture, (2) 70% TMR and 30% pasture and (3) 55% TMR and 45% pasture. Cows fed 100 : 00 had ad-libitum access to TMR to assure a daily feed refusal of approximately 10% of that offered. All cows were milked twice daily at 6.00 and 17.00 and milk production was recorded at each milking during the entire 8-week periods (Westfalia Dairy Plan, Westfalia Surge, Inc. Naperville IL, USA). Cows were weighed on two consecutive days at 15.00 during week 1 and weeks 5-8 inclusive. In the same weeks, body condition scores (BCS) were obtained by more than one independent scorer within each exper-iment, with at least one common scorer present for both experiments and all used a five-point scale (Wildman et al. 1982).
Confinement and pasture feeding management
Four weeks prior to the initiation of the experiments, cows were trained to individual feeding gates (American Calan Inc., Northwood NH, USA) and then assigned to a corn-silage based TMR (Table 1). Cows were fed twice daily using a mixing cart (Uebler Manufacturing, Vernon NY, USA). The week prior to the initiation of each experiment, all 30 cows were confined and fed the control all-TMR diet. An average 48-h TMR consumption from all 30 cows on the last 2 d was used to arrive at the restricted TMR levels for the PMR treatments. One-third of the daily feed was offered after the morning milking and the rest after the afternoon milking. Daily TMR intakes for individual cows were calculated from the difference between the amount offered and amount refused. All cows had access to water in the barn, and cows on 100 : 00 treatment had access to a bare lot for daily exercise.
The three grazing groups had access to annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam. ; var. Marshall) that was seeded on 13 September 2004. Annual ryegrass was selected as the pasture owing to its nutritive value and agronomic performance (i.e., yield, length of growing season, seeding establishment and persistence under close grazing) in southeastern USA (Ellis & Lippke, 1976). Cows grazed once daily as a single group (n= 24) between the a.m. and p.m. milking for approximately 7 h/d (8.00-15.00) after which they were milked and housed overnight in free stall barns along with cows on 100 : 00. Cows were offered fresh pasture (i.e., strip grazing) and water was available in each paddock. One field of 4.9 ha was used during the experiments. To maximize nutritive value and avoid shortages during the grazing window, the amount of pasture offered was approximately 3-times more than the targeted pasture DMI for the cows on the 55 : 45 TMR : Pasture treatment (Bargo et al. 2003).
Table 1. Ingredients of the total mixed ration (TMR) offered to all cows during Experiments 1 and 2
† Blend of poultry by-product meal, hydrolysed poultry feathers, meat and bone meal, blood meal, and fish meal (Nutrimax Inc., Greensboro NC, USA)
‡ Soybean meal
• VolclayÕ(American colloid Co., Arlington Heights IL, USA)
Pasture intake measurements
Pasture intakes were measured according to the herbage disappearance method (HDM) based on the difference between pre- and post-grazing herbage mass (Lantinga et al. 2004). Each week a cow was randomly selected from each of the three grazing treatments and assigned ran-domly to an individual plot. Sampling of herbage mass (pre- and post-grazing) occurred weekly by clipping eight 0.25-m2quadrats in each plot before and immediately after the grazing period. Clippings were taken to ground level with the aid of battery-powered sheep-shearing heads (Sunbeam, Botany, New South Wales, Australia) and care was taken to avoid soil contamination. Clippings were made at the same time of the day, approximately 15.00 on two consecutive days, positioning the post-grazing frame approximately 10 cm from, but adjacent to, the pre-vious, pre-grazing frame. Because pre- and post-grazing measurements were taken within a short window of time (24 h), growth during this period was ignored (Meijs et al.1982). Samples were placed in plastic bags, kept on ice, transported to the laboratory, and separated into three subsamples. One subsample was weighed and sub- sequently dried at 60 8C in a forced-air oven until constant weight to determine DM content. A second subsample was separated into ryegrass green leaf, green stem, and other components (i.e., brown tissue and weeds) and dried at 60 8C in a forced-air oven. The third subsample was freeze dried for later characterization of nutritive value. Ratios of leaf to stem provided additional information about pasture management and characterization.
Pasture intakes were also estimated using the NRC (2001) prediction equations as outlined by Macoon et al. (2003). Briefly, energy requirements included net energy (NE, Mcal/d) requirements for: (1) maintenance (NEM); (2) lactation (NEL); (3) body weight changes (NEBW); (4) walking activity (NEW) ; and (5) grazing activity (NEG). Total NE requirements were obtained by summing NEM, NEL, NEBW, NEW, and NEG. The NE from pasture intake was estimated as total NE requirements minus NE supplied by TMR intake.
Four weeks prior to the initiation of the experiments, cows were trained to individual feeding gates (American Calan Inc., Northwood NH, USA) and then assigned to a corn-silage based TMR (Table 1). Cows were fed twice daily using a mixing cart (Uebler Manufacturing, Vernon NY, USA). The week prior to the initiation of each experiment, all 30 cows were confined and fed the control all-TMR diet. An average 48-h TMR consumption from all 30 cows on the last 2 d was used to arrive at the restricted TMR levels for the PMR treatments. One-third of the daily feed was offered after the morning milking and the rest after the afternoon milking. Daily TMR intakes for individual cows were calculated from the difference between the amount offered and amount refused. All cows had access to water in the barn, and cows on 100 : 00 treatment had access to a bare lot for daily exercise.
The three grazing groups had access to annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam. ; var. Marshall) that was seeded on 13 September 2004. Annual ryegrass was selected as the pasture owing to its nutritive value and agronomic performance (i.e., yield, length of growing season, seeding establishment and persistence under close grazing) in southeastern USA (Ellis & Lippke, 1976). Cows grazed once daily as a single group (n= 24) between the a.m. and p.m. milking for approximately 7 h/d (8.00-15.00) after which they were milked and housed overnight in free stall barns along with cows on 100 : 00. Cows were offered fresh pasture (i.e., strip grazing) and water was available in each paddock. One field of 4.9 ha was used during the experiments. To maximize nutritive value and avoid shortages during the grazing window, the amount of pasture offered was approximately 3-times more than the targeted pasture DMI for the cows on the 55 : 45 TMR : Pasture treatment (Bargo et al. 2003).
Table 1. Ingredients of the total mixed ration (TMR) offered to all cows during Experiments 1 and 2
† Blend of poultry by-product meal, hydrolysed poultry feathers, meat and bone meal, blood meal, and fish meal (Nutrimax Inc., Greensboro NC, USA)
‡ Soybean meal
• VolclayÕ(American colloid Co., Arlington Heights IL, USA)
Pasture intake measurements
Pasture intakes were measured according to the herbage disappearance method (HDM) based on the difference between pre- and post-grazing herbage mass (Lantinga et al. 2004). Each week a cow was randomly selected from each of the three grazing treatments and assigned ran-domly to an individual plot. Sampling of herbage mass (pre- and post-grazing) occurred weekly by clipping eight 0.25-m2quadrats in each plot before and immediately after the grazing period. Clippings were taken to ground level with the aid of battery-powered sheep-shearing heads (Sunbeam, Botany, New South Wales, Australia) and care was taken to avoid soil contamination. Clippings were made at the same time of the day, approximately 15.00 on two consecutive days, positioning the post-grazing frame approximately 10 cm from, but adjacent to, the pre-vious, pre-grazing frame. Because pre- and post-grazing measurements were taken within a short window of time (24 h), growth during this period was ignored (Meijs et al.1982). Samples were placed in plastic bags, kept on ice, transported to the laboratory, and separated into three subsamples. One subsample was weighed and sub- sequently dried at 60 8C in a forced-air oven until constant weight to determine DM content. A second subsample was separated into ryegrass green leaf, green stem, and other components (i.e., brown tissue and weeds) and dried at 60 8C in a forced-air oven. The third subsample was freeze dried for later characterization of nutritive value. Ratios of leaf to stem provided additional information about pasture management and characterization.
Pasture intakes were also estimated using the NRC (2001) prediction equations as outlined by Macoon et al. (2003). Briefly, energy requirements included net energy (NE, Mcal/d) requirements for: (1) maintenance (NEM); (2) lactation (NEL); (3) body weight changes (NEBW); (4) walking activity (NEW) ; and (5) grazing activity (NEG). Total NE requirements were obtained by summing NEM, NEL, NEBW, NEW, and NEG. The NE from pasture intake was estimated as total NE requirements minus NE supplied by TMR intake.
Sample collection and analyses
Pasture samples were selectively hand plucked twice a week simulating animal grazing behaviour and stored at - 20 8C until freeze-dried. Weekly composites were ground in a Wiley mill (Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro NJ, USA) to pass through a 1-mm sieve. Freeze-dried weights were used to calculate DM. Total N was determined using a Kjeldahl procedure with an automated, colorimetric quantification of ammonia in digested samples (AOAC,1990) and multiplied by 6.25 to estimate crude protein (CP). Neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) were sequentially analysed using an Ankom fibre extractor (Ankom Technologies, Fairport NY, USA) as described by Van Soest et al. (1991). Non-protein N (NPN) was determined according to Licitra et al. (1996). In-vitro true DM digestibility (IVTDMD) was determined in an Ankom II Daisy batch analyser for a period of 48 h in a solution containing 1600 ml of McDougall's buffer (Tilley & Terry, 1963) and 400 ml of strained ruminal fluid.
Microbial residues were removed from indigestible residues by extraction with a neutral detergent solution. Samples of TMR were taken once a week, stored at - 20 8C, and subsequently freeze-dried. Samples were chemically analysed as described previously, with the exception of a heat-stable a-amylase that was added to the NDF procedure.
Individual milk samples were collected weekly and shipped to the regional Dairy Herd Improvement laboratory (United DHIA, Blacksburg VA, USA) where they were analysed for fat, protein, lactose, milk urea nitrogen (MUN) and somatic cell counts (SCC) using infrared spectrophotometry (Fossomatic 360, Foss Electronic, Slanger-upgade, Denmark). Weighted composite milk samples
from a.m. and p.m. milkings, as well as pasture and TMR samples, were analysed for fatty acid (FA) composition using gas-liquid chromatography (model CP 3380 ; GC Varian, Walnut Creek CA, USA). Milk samples (2 ml) were methylated (Kramer et al. 1997) and fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were separated and quantified using a CP-Sil 88 capillary column (Chrompack, Middleburg, The Netherlands).
Pasture samples were selectively hand plucked twice a week simulating animal grazing behaviour and stored at - 20 8C until freeze-dried. Weekly composites were ground in a Wiley mill (Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro NJ, USA) to pass through a 1-mm sieve. Freeze-dried weights were used to calculate DM. Total N was determined using a Kjeldahl procedure with an automated, colorimetric quantification of ammonia in digested samples (AOAC,1990) and multiplied by 6.25 to estimate crude protein (CP). Neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) were sequentially analysed using an Ankom fibre extractor (Ankom Technologies, Fairport NY, USA) as described by Van Soest et al. (1991). Non-protein N (NPN) was determined according to Licitra et al. (1996). In-vitro true DM digestibility (IVTDMD) was determined in an Ankom II Daisy batch analyser for a period of 48 h in a solution containing 1600 ml of McDougall's buffer (Tilley & Terry, 1963) and 400 ml of strained ruminal fluid.
Microbial residues were removed from indigestible residues by extraction with a neutral detergent solution. Samples of TMR were taken once a week, stored at - 20 8C, and subsequently freeze-dried. Samples were chemically analysed as described previously, with the exception of a heat-stable a-amylase that was added to the NDF procedure.
Individual milk samples were collected weekly and shipped to the regional Dairy Herd Improvement laboratory (United DHIA, Blacksburg VA, USA) where they were analysed for fat, protein, lactose, milk urea nitrogen (MUN) and somatic cell counts (SCC) using infrared spectrophotometry (Fossomatic 360, Foss Electronic, Slanger-upgade, Denmark). Weighted composite milk samples
from a.m. and p.m. milkings, as well as pasture and TMR samples, were analysed for fatty acid (FA) composition using gas-liquid chromatography (model CP 3380 ; GC Varian, Walnut Creek CA, USA). Milk samples (2 ml) were methylated (Kramer et al. 1997) and fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were separated and quantified using a CP-Sil 88 capillary column (Chrompack, Middleburg, The Netherlands).
Experiment 1 (Fall pasture)
Experiment 1 was conducted from 26 October to 17 December 2004. Cows averaged 32.4 ± 2.5 kg/d milk,87.1 ± 9.2 DIM, 1.6± 0.2 lactations, 561 ± 12 kg BWand 3.03 ± 0.06 BCS at the initiation of the experiment. Although the PMR were initially targeted to be 85% TMR and 15% pasture, 70% TMR and 30% pasture and 55% TMR and 45% pasture, the corresponding actual PMR consumed and the ones used to describe the dietary treatments were 79% TMR and 21% pasture (79 : 21), 68% TMR and 32% pasture (68 : 32) and 59% TMR and 41% pasture (59 : 41).
Owing to a slower growth of pasture in the fall a second pasture (paddock 2, 4.1 ha) was used in addition to paddock 1 (4.9 ha) following the first grazing cycle. Paddock 2 was used for 9 d during this experiment and was located approximately 600 m from the free stall housing. Fresh pasture offered daily averaged 0.18 ha (75.3 m2per cow) for 51 d. Paddocks 1 and 2 were fertilized before the beginning of Experiment 1 (4 October 2004) with 32.6 and 48.4 kg N/ha, respectively, and were spray-irrigated in November 2004 with lagoon waste delivering the equivalent of 22.6 and 7.8 kg N/ha, respectively. Estimates of pasture DMI using the HDM (n= 6) were obtained once a week, with the exception of weeks 1 and 5 which had to be deferred because of incessant rain. Individual plot size varied according to herbage mass and averaged 144.6 m2/cow.
Experiment 1 was conducted from 26 October to 17 December 2004. Cows averaged 32.4 ± 2.5 kg/d milk,87.1 ± 9.2 DIM, 1.6± 0.2 lactations, 561 ± 12 kg BWand 3.03 ± 0.06 BCS at the initiation of the experiment. Although the PMR were initially targeted to be 85% TMR and 15% pasture, 70% TMR and 30% pasture and 55% TMR and 45% pasture, the corresponding actual PMR consumed and the ones used to describe the dietary treatments were 79% TMR and 21% pasture (79 : 21), 68% TMR and 32% pasture (68 : 32) and 59% TMR and 41% pasture (59 : 41).
Owing to a slower growth of pasture in the fall a second pasture (paddock 2, 4.1 ha) was used in addition to paddock 1 (4.9 ha) following the first grazing cycle. Paddock 2 was used for 9 d during this experiment and was located approximately 600 m from the free stall housing. Fresh pasture offered daily averaged 0.18 ha (75.3 m2per cow) for 51 d. Paddocks 1 and 2 were fertilized before the beginning of Experiment 1 (4 October 2004) with 32.6 and 48.4 kg N/ha, respectively, and were spray-irrigated in November 2004 with lagoon waste delivering the equivalent of 22.6 and 7.8 kg N/ha, respectively. Estimates of pasture DMI using the HDM (n= 6) were obtained once a week, with the exception of weeks 1 and 5 which had to be deferred because of incessant rain. Individual plot size varied according to herbage mass and averaged 144.6 m2/cow.
Experiment 2 (Spring pasture)
Experiment 2 was conducted from 22 March to 13 May 2005. Cows averaged 36.6 ± 1.5 kg milk, 125.7± 6.7 DIM, 1.9 ± 0.2 lactations, 607 ± 12 kg BW and 2.88 ± 0.06 BCS at the initiation of the experiment. Instead of the targeted PMR of 85% TMR and 15% pasture, 70% TMR and 30% pasture and 55% TMR and 45% pasture, corresponding actual PMR consumed were 89% TMR and 11% pasture (89 : 11), 79% TMR and 21% pasture (79 : 21) and 65% TMR and 35% pasture (65 : 35).
Fresh pasture offered daily averaged 0.15 ha (63.3 m2 per cow) for 46 d. The pasture received no supplemental N during the spring of 2005 owing to State regulations that require a reduction in N-loading in the area (Neuse River Basin, Natural Resources Conservation Service, NRCS).
Estimates of pasture DMI using the HDM (n= 8) were obtained once a week during the 8-week trial. Individual plot size varied according to herbage mass and averaged 107.7 m2/cow.
Blood samples were collected once a week from coccygeal vessels. Initial samples were collected during week 1 and thereafter from weeks 5-8 before the p.m.milking. Plasma was analysed for glucose (YSI 2700 Select, Yellow Springs Instrument Co. Inc., Yellow Springs OH, USA), urea N (Technicon AutoAnalyzer II, Technicon Industrial method No. 334-74A/A, Technicon Industrial Systems, Tarrytown NY, USA) and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA; Wako NEFA C kit No. 994-75409 E, Wako Chemicals USA, Inc., Richmond VA, USA).
Experiment 2 was conducted from 22 March to 13 May 2005. Cows averaged 36.6 ± 1.5 kg milk, 125.7± 6.7 DIM, 1.9 ± 0.2 lactations, 607 ± 12 kg BW and 2.88 ± 0.06 BCS at the initiation of the experiment. Instead of the targeted PMR of 85% TMR and 15% pasture, 70% TMR and 30% pasture and 55% TMR and 45% pasture, corresponding actual PMR consumed were 89% TMR and 11% pasture (89 : 11), 79% TMR and 21% pasture (79 : 21) and 65% TMR and 35% pasture (65 : 35).
Fresh pasture offered daily averaged 0.15 ha (63.3 m2 per cow) for 46 d. The pasture received no supplemental N during the spring of 2005 owing to State regulations that require a reduction in N-loading in the area (Neuse River Basin, Natural Resources Conservation Service, NRCS).
Estimates of pasture DMI using the HDM (n= 8) were obtained once a week during the 8-week trial. Individual plot size varied according to herbage mass and averaged 107.7 m2/cow.
Blood samples were collected once a week from coccygeal vessels. Initial samples were collected during week 1 and thereafter from weeks 5-8 before the p.m.milking. Plasma was analysed for glucose (YSI 2700 Select, Yellow Springs Instrument Co. Inc., Yellow Springs OH, USA), urea N (Technicon AutoAnalyzer II, Technicon Industrial method No. 334-74A/A, Technicon Industrial Systems, Tarrytown NY, USA) and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA; Wako NEFA C kit No. 994-75409 E, Wako Chemicals USA, Inc., Richmond VA, USA).
Table 2. Chemical composition (mean ± SE) of the TMR and pasture offered to all cows in Experiments 1 and 2 (DM basis)
† In vitro true DM disappearance
‡ A = non-protein N; B1= rapidly degraded fraction ; B2= intermediately
degraded fraction ; B3= slowly degraded fraction ; C = unavailable frac-
tion
‡ A = non-protein N; B1= rapidly degraded fraction ; B2= intermediately
degraded fraction ; B3= slowly degraded fraction ; C = unavailable frac-
tion
Statistical analyses
Data from both experiments were analysed according to a randomized complete block design using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS (2002), with a 3-week adaptation period (weeks 1-3) and a 5-week data collection period (weeks 4-8). The model included the effect of treatment in addition to a random block term and a residual error term. Linear, quadratic and lack-of-fit effects were tested by partitioning the degrees of freedom for treatment into single degree of freedom contrasts. For each variable analysed, covariates for pretreatment milk yield, DIM, parity, SCC, BW and BCS were included and kept in the model when significant (P < 0.05). Least squares means and SEM are reported for all data, and significance was established at P<0.05 and trends at P<0.10.
Results
Nutrient composition (Experiments 1 and 2)
Pasture CP averaged 23.7% in Experiment 1, and 13.9% in Experiment 2 (Table 2). Total soluble protein (Fraction A) comprised a greater proportion of the CP in the pasture compared with TMR. Linoleic (18 : 2) and oleic (18 : 1) comprised the main fatty acids in TMR, whereas linolenic (18 : 3) was the predominant fatty acid in pasture.
Nutrient composition (Experiments 1 and 2)
Pasture CP averaged 23.7% in Experiment 1, and 13.9% in Experiment 2 (Table 2). Total soluble protein (Fraction A) comprised a greater proportion of the CP in the pasture compared with TMR. Linoleic (18 : 2) and oleic (18 : 1) comprised the main fatty acids in TMR, whereas linolenic (18 : 3) was the predominant fatty acid in pasture.
Experiment 1
Weather data : Average monthly temperatures (8C) at soil level and at a 2-m height were 24.4 and 21.7 in September, 20.3 and 16.7 in October, 14.6 and 11.9 in November, and 9.4 and 8.5 in December (first 18 d), respectively, with an average of 13.4 and 11.4 for the experiment. This compares with a long-term mean (1982-2005) of 23.8 and 21.4 in September, 17.9 and 15.5 in October, 13.2 and 11.8 in November and 7.4 and 5.8 in December, respectively. Precipitation during September, October, November and December was 113.0, 36.2, 80.1 and 28.8 mm, respectively, and accumulated a total of 108.9 mm during the experiment. Long-term averages (1982-2005) for each of the 4 months were 128.0, 77.0, 46.2 and 62.5 mm, respectively (State Climate Office of North Carolina, NC CRONOS Data-base, data retrieval from Lake Wheeler Rd. Field Lab, Raleigh NC, USA).
Intakes, BW and BCS : Intake of TMR was greatest for cows on 100 : 00 (25.8 kg/d) and decreased with increasing proportions of pasture in the diets (Table 3). Pasture intake tended to increase linearly (P= 0.06) with decreasing TMR and averaged 4.6, 7.1 and 9.2 kg/d for the three PMR (21, 32 and 41% dietary pasture, respectively). BW changes (week 8 minus week 5) showed a quadratic (P= 0.05) response, ranging from - 4 (100 : 00) to 14 kg (79 : 21). BCS changes increased linearly (P= 0.04) with increasing pasture, with changes ranging from - 0.20 (100 : 00) to 0.25 (59 : 41).
Milk production and milk composition : Milk yields and milk constituents did not differ among treatments except for milk protein concentration and somatic cell scores (SCS) (Table 4). Milk protein concentration was greatest for cows on 68 : 32 (3.12%) and least for cows on 59 : 41 (2.84%). The concentration of 16 : 0 in milk fat decreased quadratically (P = 0.002) with increasing intakes of pasture. The concentration of cis 18 : 1, cis-9, trans-11 CLA, 18 : 3 and unsaturated fatty acids (UFA, the sum of 18 : 1, 18 : 2, CLA and 18 : 3) in milk fat increased linearly (P< 0.001) with increasing intakes of pasture, whereas the concentration of saturated fatty acids (SFA,the sum of 10 : 0, 12 : 0, 14 : 0, 16 : 0 and 18 : 0) in milk fat decreased linearly (P< 0.001) with increasing intakes of pasture.
TMR and pasture combinations for dairy cows
Table 3. Intakes of dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP), and adjusted body weights (BW) and body condition scores (BCS) of
cows offered varying amounts of TMR and pasture in Experiment 1
Click here to enlarge the image
Table 4. Milk production, milk composition and milk fatty acid composition of cows offered varying amounts of TMR and pasture in
Experiment 1
Experiment 1
Table 5. Intakes of dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP), and adjusted body weights (BW) and body condition scores (BCS) of
cows offered varying amounts of TMR and pasture in Experiment 2
cows offered varying amounts of TMR and pasture in Experiment 2
Experiment 2
Weather data : Average temperatures (8C) at soil level and at a 2-m height were 8.5 and 9.1 in March, 16.6 and 15.8 in April and 19.0 and 16.7 in May (first 13 d), respectively, with overall soil and 2-m average temperatures of 16.4 and 15.6 for the experiment. This compares with a long-term mean (1982-2005) of 11.5 and 11.4 in March, 16.5 and 19.1 in April and 23.0 and 22.6 in May, respectively. Precipitation during these months was 9.9, 8.7 and 50.0 mm and accumulated a total of 62.2 mm during the experiment compared with long-term averages (1982-2005) of 104.3, 50.5 and 33.7 mm for the respective months.
Intakes, BW and BCS : Intake of TMR was greatest for cows on 100 : 00 (24.9 kg/d) and decreased with increasing proportions of pasture in the diets (Table 5). Pasture intake increased linearly (P< 0.001) with decreasing TMR and averaged 2.2, 4.2 and 6.9 kg/d for the three PMR (11, 21 and 35% dietary pasture, respectively). Total daily DMI and daily CP intake decreased quadratically (P< 0.01) with increasing intakes of pasture. BW changes (week 8 minus week 5) showed a quadratic (P< 0.001) response, attributed to a net BW loss of cows on 100 : 00 (- 16 kg) whereas cows on PMR gained BW. BCS, however, did not differ between treatments.
Milk production and milk composition: Milk yield and 4% FCM yields decreased linearly (P < 0.02) with increasing pasture (Table 6). Milk fat concentration tended (P = 0.10) to increase with increasing pasture and ranged from 3.31% (100 : 00) to 3.68% (65 : 35). Although milk fat yields were unaffected by treatment, milk protein yields decreased linearly (P< 0.01) with increasing intakes of pasture. MUN decreased quadratically (P< 0.001) with increasing intakes of pasture. Concentrations of 16 : 0, 18 : 2 and SFA in milkfat decreased linearly (P< 0.05) with increasing intakes of pasture. Conversely, the concentration of cis 18 : 1, cis-9, trans-11 CLA and 18 : 3 in milk fat increased linearly (P< 0.05) with increasing intakes of pasture. Concentrations of trans 18 : 1 showed a quadratic (P< 0.001) response to varying levels of TMR and pasture.
Blood metabolites: Plasma glucose concentration averaged 61.5 mg/dl in 100 : 00 and decreased linearly (P=0.002) with increasing intakes of pasture (Table 7). PlasmaNEFA concentration at the initiation of the data collectionperiod tended (P= 0.09) to increase with increasing pasture, but was reduced in cows on PMR compared with cows on 100 : 00 by the end of the experiment (92v.209 meq/l, respectively). Similarly, plasma urea nitrogen (PUN) decreased quadratically (P < 0.001) with increasing intakes of pasture, presumably from the sharp decrease in PUN between 100 : 00 (13.9 mg/dl) and 89 : 11 (9.0 mg/dl).
Experiments 1 and 2
Estimates of pasture DMI : In Experiment 1, estimates of daily pasture DMI determined using the HDM were similar to those predicted using NRC equations (Table 8). In Experiment 2, however, estimates of daily pasture DMI obtained using the HDM method were consistently lower (P< 0.05) than estimates obtained using the NRC equations. Also, in Experiment 2, both methods of estimating pasture DMI showed a linear increase (P< 0.001) in pasture intake with increasing proportion of pasture in the diet.
Table 6. Milk production, milk composition and milk fatty acid composition of cows offered varying amounts of TMR and pasture inExperiment 2
Table 7. Plasma metabolites of cows offered varying amounts of TMR and pasture in Experiment 2
Discussion
Dietary nutrient composition
The TMR was formulated to provide 16% CP (38.8% Rumen undegradable protein, 6.1% ether extract; NRC 2001). The nutritive value of annual ryegrass varied from week 4 to week 8 during both experiments (only means are presented in Table 2). As the fall grazing season progressed, pasture DM concentration increased from 15.9% (week 4) to 21.1% (week 8) (data not shown). Similarly, DM concentration in Experiment 2 increased from 21.3% (week 4) to 25.7% (week 8) during the spring grazing season (data not shown).
In Experiment 1, pasture CP ranged from 21.6 to 25.8% (DM basis) and increased markedly from week 4 to week 5 which corresponded with the timing of N application. In Experiment 2, pasture CP ranged from 11.8% (week 6) to 15.1% (week 4). With cool-season grasses a rapid rate of decline in CP concentration seems to occur during the early stages of growth and the rate of decline slows as the pasture becomes more mature (Fick & Onstad, 1988).
In Experiment 2 (spring pasture), rainfall was less and coupled with warmer temperature, forage maturation was accelerated resulting in reduced CP concentration compared with the fall forage (Experiment 1).
Table 8. Estimates of pasture dry matter intake using a herbage disappearance method (HDM) and NRC estimates (NRC, 2001) in Experiments 1 and 2
Pasture and total nutrient intakes
Total DMI for cows fed 100 : 00 averaged 25.8 kg/d in Experiment 1 and 24.9 kg/d in Experiment 2. Total DMI for the three PMR was similar within each experiment, and averaged 21.7 kg/d in Experiment 1 and 19.8 kg/d in Experiment 2. Reducing the proportion of TMR in the diets increased pasture consumption of cows on all PMR, but reduced total DMI compared with cows on 100 : 00. Reduced DMI from cows offered pasture most likely arises from a combination of restricted time spent grazing, grazing window (08.00-15.00) not including normal grazing pattern and the inherently more arduous grass harvesting compared with indoor, chopped feeding associated with TMR. Given extremely low refusals of TMR, cows offered pasture did not seem to substitute pasture for the TMR portion of their feed. All experimental cows were in the regular milking herd and offered an all-TMR ration prior to the initiation of the studies. They had all been exposed to pastures and had some grazing experience as growing heifers and during their dry periods. Reports from studies on feeding a combination of TMR and pasture show similar intake patterns (Soriano et al. 2001 ; Bargo et al. 2002).
Total DMI for cows fed 100 : 00 averaged 25.8 kg/d in Experiment 1 and 24.9 kg/d in Experiment 2. Total DMI for the three PMR was similar within each experiment, and averaged 21.7 kg/d in Experiment 1 and 19.8 kg/d in Experiment 2. Reducing the proportion of TMR in the diets increased pasture consumption of cows on all PMR, but reduced total DMI compared with cows on 100 : 00. Reduced DMI from cows offered pasture most likely arises from a combination of restricted time spent grazing, grazing window (08.00-15.00) not including normal grazing pattern and the inherently more arduous grass harvesting compared with indoor, chopped feeding associated with TMR. Given extremely low refusals of TMR, cows offered pasture did not seem to substitute pasture for the TMR portion of their feed. All experimental cows were in the regular milking herd and offered an all-TMR ration prior to the initiation of the studies. They had all been exposed to pastures and had some grazing experience as growing heifers and during their dry periods. Reports from studies on feeding a combination of TMR and pasture show similar intake patterns (Soriano et al. 2001 ; Bargo et al. 2002).
Despite having access to high-quality pasture, Bargo et al.(2002) report that cows on pasture plus TMR that are offered 17 kg DM of TMR daily consume almost all of what was offered (15.5 kg DM consumed). Similarly, Soriano et al. (2001) report TMR intakes of 26.6 kg DM/d for cows offered unrestricted TMR, 17.5 kg/d for cows offered TMR plus access to pasture in the afternoon, and 20.3 kg/d for cows offered TMR plus access to pasture in the morning. HDM and NRC predictions for estimating DMI were positively correlated (P < 0.05) with r= 0.51 in Experiment 1 and r= 0.61 in Experiment 2, and were of the magnitude reported by Macoon et al. (2003). The coefficients of determination (r2) and SE of prediction (Sxy) were 0.26 and 2.9 kg DM, respectively, for Experiment 1, and 0.37 and 1.7 kg DM, respectively, for Experiment 2. Also, in Experiment 1 no differences were reported between pasture DMI estimates using the HDM compared with those predicted from NRC, but our estimates were numerically greater than those obtained using NRC predictions, particularly as the proportion of pasture in the diet increased.
In contrast, pasture DMI estimates based on HDM in Experiment 2 were lower than those predicted by NRC equations, but the magnitude of the difference was less as the proportion of pasture in the diet increased. The use of a HDM for estimating pasture DMI proved to be successful for rotational stocking and short grazing periods (Macoon et al. 2003; Fontaneli et al. 2005). Both the HDM and reverse calculations based on animal performance provide biologically reasonable estimates of DMI of cows grazing rye and ryegrass or ryegrass, crimson clover and red clover mixed pastures (Macoon et al. 2003) and intensively managed kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pastures (Reeves et al. 1996).
In contrast, pasture DMI estimates based on HDM in Experiment 2 were lower than those predicted by NRC equations, but the magnitude of the difference was less as the proportion of pasture in the diet increased. The use of a HDM for estimating pasture DMI proved to be successful for rotational stocking and short grazing periods (Macoon et al. 2003; Fontaneli et al. 2005). Both the HDM and reverse calculations based on animal performance provide biologically reasonable estimates of DMI of cows grazing rye and ryegrass or ryegrass, crimson clover and red clover mixed pastures (Macoon et al. 2003) and intensively managed kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pastures (Reeves et al. 1996).
Milk production and composition
Although cows fed an all-TMR diet supported greater milk yields than the PMR combination the difference was significant only in Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, the decline in milk production of cows consuming 32% pasture was unexpected since increasing pasture to 41% showed no further decrease. In Experiment 2, however, the two high pasture diets (21 and 35% pasture) resulted in significantly less milk production. Cows that consumed 100 : 00 in Experiment 1 produced 14% more milk and 5% more FCM than cows consuming 68 : 32. Likewise, cows that consumed 100 : 00 in Experiment 2 produced 15% more milk and 9% more FCM than cows consuming 79 : 21.
Others report similar effects on milk production, but the magnitude of the differences vary, and are most likely attributable to a combination of DMI, dietary ingredients, pasture nutritive value, and the energetics involved in walking and grazing activities. Based on the NE concentration in milk and the extra daily activity of cows on the PMR (NRC, 2001), daily maintenance energy requirements for cows grazing in Experiment 1 were increased by 0.97, 0.85 and 0.61 Mcal for cows on 59 : 41, 68 : 32, and 79 : 21, respectively, compared with cows on 100 : 00. This potentially accounted for 1.4, 1.1, and 0.9 kg of extra milk for the corresponding grazing groups. Similarly, in Experiment 2, daily maintenance energy requirements for cows grazing were increased by 0.76, 0.60 and 0.43 Mcal for cows on 65 : 35, 79 : 21, and 89 : 11, respectively, compared with cows fed all-TMR, accounting for 1.1, 0.9 and 0.6 kg of milk for cows on the corresponding grazing groups. As expected, some combination of increased activity and decreased energy intake accounts for much of the difference in milk production among dietary treatments (Kolver & Muller, 1998; Bargo et al. 2002). Interestingly, cows that had access to pasture showed increased feed efficiencies (kg feed/kg 4% FCM) compared with cows consuming all-TMR. Feed conversion efficiencies of cows fed all-TMR were 0.80 in Experiment 1 and 0.76 in Experiment 2, compared with 0.68 and 0.63 across all PMR diets, respectively. MUN in both experiments was within the normal range of 10-15 mg/dl (Moore & Varga, 1996). Because MUN reflects CP intake (Wittwer et al. 1999) MUN concentrations were greater for the three grazing groups during Experiment 1 (fall) than during Experiment 2 (spring). Factors such as the proportion of rumen degradable and rumen undegradable protein, and ratios of protein to energy in the diet also affect MUN (Baker et al.1995).
Although cows fed an all-TMR diet supported greater milk yields than the PMR combination the difference was significant only in Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, the decline in milk production of cows consuming 32% pasture was unexpected since increasing pasture to 41% showed no further decrease. In Experiment 2, however, the two high pasture diets (21 and 35% pasture) resulted in significantly less milk production. Cows that consumed 100 : 00 in Experiment 1 produced 14% more milk and 5% more FCM than cows consuming 68 : 32. Likewise, cows that consumed 100 : 00 in Experiment 2 produced 15% more milk and 9% more FCM than cows consuming 79 : 21.
Others report similar effects on milk production, but the magnitude of the differences vary, and are most likely attributable to a combination of DMI, dietary ingredients, pasture nutritive value, and the energetics involved in walking and grazing activities. Based on the NE concentration in milk and the extra daily activity of cows on the PMR (NRC, 2001), daily maintenance energy requirements for cows grazing in Experiment 1 were increased by 0.97, 0.85 and 0.61 Mcal for cows on 59 : 41, 68 : 32, and 79 : 21, respectively, compared with cows on 100 : 00. This potentially accounted for 1.4, 1.1, and 0.9 kg of extra milk for the corresponding grazing groups. Similarly, in Experiment 2, daily maintenance energy requirements for cows grazing were increased by 0.76, 0.60 and 0.43 Mcal for cows on 65 : 35, 79 : 21, and 89 : 11, respectively, compared with cows fed all-TMR, accounting for 1.1, 0.9 and 0.6 kg of milk for cows on the corresponding grazing groups. As expected, some combination of increased activity and decreased energy intake accounts for much of the difference in milk production among dietary treatments (Kolver & Muller, 1998; Bargo et al. 2002). Interestingly, cows that had access to pasture showed increased feed efficiencies (kg feed/kg 4% FCM) compared with cows consuming all-TMR. Feed conversion efficiencies of cows fed all-TMR were 0.80 in Experiment 1 and 0.76 in Experiment 2, compared with 0.68 and 0.63 across all PMR diets, respectively. MUN in both experiments was within the normal range of 10-15 mg/dl (Moore & Varga, 1996). Because MUN reflects CP intake (Wittwer et al. 1999) MUN concentrations were greater for the three grazing groups during Experiment 1 (fall) than during Experiment 2 (spring). Factors such as the proportion of rumen degradable and rumen undegradable protein, and ratios of protein to energy in the diet also affect MUN (Baker et al.1995).
Milk fatty acid composition
Reduced TMR and increased pasture consumption in both experiments decreased total dietary fat, decreased the proportion of 18 : 1 and 18 : 2, and increased the proportion of 18 : 3 in the diets. The TMR fed to cows was relatively high in 16 : 0 and 18 : 2 whereas the pasture was high in 18 : 3 (Table 2). The FA profile of milk from both experiments was consistent with the practice of feeding stored v. fresh forages, and has been attributed to the loss of precursor FA during the silage- or hay-making process (Dewhurst et al. 2001). The FA composition reported for annual ryegrass was within the range of values reported elsewhere (Schroeder et al. 2004). Milk from grazing cows contains more trans fatty acids than milk from cows fed a TMR, primarily because of an increase in trans-11 18 : 1 concentration (Loor et al. 2003). The increased concentration of trans-11 18 : 1 in milk from cows that graze was not seen in our study, suggesting limited impact of pasture on the biohydrogenation activity for the diets tested. The concentration of CLA in milk fat increased linearly with increasing pasture in both experiments and was consistent with the literature (Dhiman et al. 1999; Loor et al. 2003; Schroeder et al. 2005).
Reduced TMR and increased pasture consumption in both experiments decreased total dietary fat, decreased the proportion of 18 : 1 and 18 : 2, and increased the proportion of 18 : 3 in the diets. The TMR fed to cows was relatively high in 16 : 0 and 18 : 2 whereas the pasture was high in 18 : 3 (Table 2). The FA profile of milk from both experiments was consistent with the practice of feeding stored v. fresh forages, and has been attributed to the loss of precursor FA during the silage- or hay-making process (Dewhurst et al. 2001). The FA composition reported for annual ryegrass was within the range of values reported elsewhere (Schroeder et al. 2004). Milk from grazing cows contains more trans fatty acids than milk from cows fed a TMR, primarily because of an increase in trans-11 18 : 1 concentration (Loor et al. 2003). The increased concentration of trans-11 18 : 1 in milk from cows that graze was not seen in our study, suggesting limited impact of pasture on the biohydrogenation activity for the diets tested. The concentration of CLA in milk fat increased linearly with increasing pasture in both experiments and was consistent with the literature (Dhiman et al. 1999; Loor et al. 2003; Schroeder et al. 2005).
Body weights, body condition scores and blood metabolites
A common feature of both experiments was the association between BW losses ( - 4 and - 16 kg) and BCS losses ( - 0.2 and - 0.07) for treatment 100 : 00 compared with the groups that had access to pasture. Despite these features, our results were unexpected, and are somewhat in disagreement with some of the findings reported previously. Cows fed TMR exclusively either maintain (Kolver & Muller, 1998; Bargo et al. 2002) or gain BCS (Tucker et al. 2001) whereas cows consuming pasture only diets lose BCS (Kolver & Muller, 1998; Tucker et al. 2001).
Plasma glucose concentration was greatest (P= 0.05) for 100 : 00 and least for 89 : 11 and 65 : 35 in week 5 (Experiment 2), but remained similar across treatments during the week that followed (data not shown). This pattern of plasma glucose concentration indicates a smaller discrepancy between energy demand and energy supply as the spring season progressed. These results are consistent with initially lower plasma glucose concentrations (60 v. 65 mg/dl) for cows transitioning from a TMR to a pasture-only diet, but become similar over time (Kolver & Muller, 1998). Also, Bargo et al. (2002) report similar plasma glucose concentrations of cows consuming pasture plus concentrate, pasture plus TMR and TMR, averaging 65 mg/dl.
Plasma NEFA concentrations, a measure of adipose tissue mobilization, only tended to differ in week 5. However, by week 8, NEFA concentrations decreased quadratically with increasing intakes of pasture. Concurrently, BW losses in Experiment 2 (week 8 minus week 5) were only reported for treatment 100 : 00 ( - 16 kg) whereas all three grazing groups gained BW, indicating a greater body fat mobilization for cows on 100 : 00 to support greater levels of milk production.
In conclusion, including pasture as a major proportion in partial mixed rations is a viable option to confinement dairying. Most dairy enterprises in the eastern USA have a land resource that can be readily shifted into grass, or legume-based pastures that will provide an economic source of forage with adequate nutritive value. The producer has the freedom to vary the amount of pasture in the partial mixed ration to meet the economics of production while providing milk with enhanced CLA concentrations and hence a healthier consumer product.
A common feature of both experiments was the association between BW losses ( - 4 and - 16 kg) and BCS losses ( - 0.2 and - 0.07) for treatment 100 : 00 compared with the groups that had access to pasture. Despite these features, our results were unexpected, and are somewhat in disagreement with some of the findings reported previously. Cows fed TMR exclusively either maintain (Kolver & Muller, 1998; Bargo et al. 2002) or gain BCS (Tucker et al. 2001) whereas cows consuming pasture only diets lose BCS (Kolver & Muller, 1998; Tucker et al. 2001).
Plasma glucose concentration was greatest (P= 0.05) for 100 : 00 and least for 89 : 11 and 65 : 35 in week 5 (Experiment 2), but remained similar across treatments during the week that followed (data not shown). This pattern of plasma glucose concentration indicates a smaller discrepancy between energy demand and energy supply as the spring season progressed. These results are consistent with initially lower plasma glucose concentrations (60 v. 65 mg/dl) for cows transitioning from a TMR to a pasture-only diet, but become similar over time (Kolver & Muller, 1998). Also, Bargo et al. (2002) report similar plasma glucose concentrations of cows consuming pasture plus concentrate, pasture plus TMR and TMR, averaging 65 mg/dl.
Plasma NEFA concentrations, a measure of adipose tissue mobilization, only tended to differ in week 5. However, by week 8, NEFA concentrations decreased quadratically with increasing intakes of pasture. Concurrently, BW losses in Experiment 2 (week 8 minus week 5) were only reported for treatment 100 : 00 ( - 16 kg) whereas all three grazing groups gained BW, indicating a greater body fat mobilization for cows on 100 : 00 to support greater levels of milk production.
In conclusion, including pasture as a major proportion in partial mixed rations is a viable option to confinement dairying. Most dairy enterprises in the eastern USA have a land resource that can be readily shifted into grass, or legume-based pastures that will provide an economic source of forage with adequate nutritive value. The producer has the freedom to vary the amount of pasture in the partial mixed ration to meet the economics of production while providing milk with enhanced CLA concentrations and hence a healthier consumer product.
We thank Sarah Jo McLeod for assisting with sample handling and analyses, and Pete Thompson, Justin Garrett, Weston McCorkle and Wayne McLamb for assistance in conducting these experiments.
References
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990 Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edition Arlington VA, USA: AOAC
Bargo F, Muller LD, Delahoy JE & Cassidy TW 2002 Performance of high producing dairy cows with three different feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed rations. Journal of Dairy Science 85 2948-2963
Bargo F, Muller LD, Kolver ES & Delahoy JE 2003 Invited review: production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 86 1-42
Baker LD, Ferguson JD & Chalupa W 1995 Responses in urea and true protein of milk to different protein feeding schemes for dairy cows.Journal of Dairy Science 78 2424-2434
Dewhurst RJ, Scollan ND, Youell SJ, Tweed JKS & Humphreys MO 2001 Influence of species, cutting date and cutting interval on the fatty acid composition of grasses. Grass and Forage Science 56 68-74
Dhiman TR, Anand GR, Satter LD & Pariza MW 1999 Conjugated linoleic acid content of milk from cows fed different diets. Journal of Dairy Science 82 2146-2156
Ellis WC & Lippke H 1976 Nutritional values of forages. In: Grasses and Legumes in Texas : Development, Production, and Utilization,
pp. 26-66 (Ed. C Holt). Texas Agricultural Experimental Station Fick GW & Onstad DW 1988 Statistical models for predicting alfalfa
herbage quality from morphological or weather data. Journal of Production Agriculture 1 160-166
Fontaneli RS, Sollenberger LE, Littell RC & Staples CR 2005 Performance of lactating dairy cows managed on pasture-based or in freestall barnfeeding systems. Journal of Dairy Science 88 1264-1276
Kolver ES & Muller LD 1998 Performance and nutrient intake of high producing Holstein cows consuming pasture or a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science 81 1403-1411
Kramer JKG, Fellner V, Dugan MER, Sauer FD, Mossoba MM & Yurawecz MP 1997 Evaluating acid and base catalysts in the methylation of milk and rumen fatty acids with special emphasis on conjugated dienes and total trans fatty acids. Lipids 32 1219-1228
Lantinga EA, Neuteboom JH & Meijs JAC 2004 Sward methods. In Herbage Intake Handbook, pp. 23-52. (Ed. PD Penning). Reading,
UK : British Grassland SocietyLicitra G, Hernandez TM & Van Soest PJ 1996 Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57 347-358
Loor JJ, Soriano FD, Lin X, Herbein JH & Polan CE 2003 Grazing allowance after the morning or afternoon milking for lactating dairy cows fed a total mixed ration (TMR) enhances trans 11-18 : 1 and cis 9, trans11-18 : 2 (rumenic acid) in milk fat to different extents. Animal Feed Science and Technology 109 105-119
Macoon B, Sollenberger LE, Moore JE, Staples CR, Fike JH & Portier KM 2003 Comparison of three techniques for estimating the forage intake of lactating dairy cows on pasture. Journal of Animal Science 81 2357-2366
Meijs JAC, Walters RJK & Keen A 1982 Sward methods. In Herbage Intake Handbook, pp. 11 (Ed. JD Leaver). Hurley, UK : British Grassland Society
Moore DA & Varga G 1996 BUN and MUN : Urea nitrogen testing in dairy cattle. Compendium Continuing Education Veterinary 18
712-721
National Research Council 2001 Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle.7th Revision Washington DC, USA: National Academy Press
Reeves M, Fulkerson WJ, Kellaway RC & Dove H 1996 A comparison of three techniques to determine the herbage intake of dairy cows grazing kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 36 23-30
SAS Institute Inc 2002 SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9.1.3. SAS Institute, Cary NC, USA
Schroeder GF, Couderc JJ, Bargo F & Rearte DH 2005 Milk production and fatty acid profile of milk fat by dairy cows fed a winter oats (Avena sativa L.) pasture only or a total mixed ration. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 48 187-195
Schroeder GF, Gagliostro GA, Bargo F, Delahoy JE & Muller LD 2004 Effects of fat supplementation on milk production and composition by dairy cows on pasture: a review. Livestock and Production Science 86 1-18
Soriano FD, Polan CE & Miller CN 2001 Supplementing pasture to lactating Holsteins fed a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science 84 2460-2468
Tilley JM & Terry RA 1963 A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society 18 104-
111
Tucker WB, Rude BJ & Wittayakun S 2001 Case Study : Performance and economics of dairy cows fed a corn silage-based total mixed ration or grazing annual ryegrass during mid to late lactation. Professional Animal Scientist 17 195-201
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB & Lewis BA 1991 Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74 3583-3597
White SL, Benson GA, Washburn SP & Green JT, Jr 2002 Milk production and economic measures in confinement or pasture systems using seasonally calved Holstein and Jersey cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85 95-104
Wildman EE, Jones GM, Wagner PE, Boman RL, Troutt HF & Lesch TN 1982 A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science 65 495-501
Wittwer FG, Gallardo P, Reyes J & Opitz H 1999 Bulk milk urea concentrations and their relationship with cow fertility in grazing
dairy herds in Southern Chile. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 38 159-166
Bargo F, Muller LD, Delahoy JE & Cassidy TW 2002 Performance of high producing dairy cows with three different feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed rations. Journal of Dairy Science 85 2948-2963
Bargo F, Muller LD, Kolver ES & Delahoy JE 2003 Invited review: production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 86 1-42
Baker LD, Ferguson JD & Chalupa W 1995 Responses in urea and true protein of milk to different protein feeding schemes for dairy cows.Journal of Dairy Science 78 2424-2434
Dewhurst RJ, Scollan ND, Youell SJ, Tweed JKS & Humphreys MO 2001 Influence of species, cutting date and cutting interval on the fatty acid composition of grasses. Grass and Forage Science 56 68-74
Dhiman TR, Anand GR, Satter LD & Pariza MW 1999 Conjugated linoleic acid content of milk from cows fed different diets. Journal of Dairy Science 82 2146-2156
Ellis WC & Lippke H 1976 Nutritional values of forages. In: Grasses and Legumes in Texas : Development, Production, and Utilization,
pp. 26-66 (Ed. C Holt). Texas Agricultural Experimental Station Fick GW & Onstad DW 1988 Statistical models for predicting alfalfa
herbage quality from morphological or weather data. Journal of Production Agriculture 1 160-166
Fontaneli RS, Sollenberger LE, Littell RC & Staples CR 2005 Performance of lactating dairy cows managed on pasture-based or in freestall barnfeeding systems. Journal of Dairy Science 88 1264-1276
Kolver ES & Muller LD 1998 Performance and nutrient intake of high producing Holstein cows consuming pasture or a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science 81 1403-1411
Kramer JKG, Fellner V, Dugan MER, Sauer FD, Mossoba MM & Yurawecz MP 1997 Evaluating acid and base catalysts in the methylation of milk and rumen fatty acids with special emphasis on conjugated dienes and total trans fatty acids. Lipids 32 1219-1228
Lantinga EA, Neuteboom JH & Meijs JAC 2004 Sward methods. In Herbage Intake Handbook, pp. 23-52. (Ed. PD Penning). Reading,
UK : British Grassland SocietyLicitra G, Hernandez TM & Van Soest PJ 1996 Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57 347-358
Loor JJ, Soriano FD, Lin X, Herbein JH & Polan CE 2003 Grazing allowance after the morning or afternoon milking for lactating dairy cows fed a total mixed ration (TMR) enhances trans 11-18 : 1 and cis 9, trans11-18 : 2 (rumenic acid) in milk fat to different extents. Animal Feed Science and Technology 109 105-119
Macoon B, Sollenberger LE, Moore JE, Staples CR, Fike JH & Portier KM 2003 Comparison of three techniques for estimating the forage intake of lactating dairy cows on pasture. Journal of Animal Science 81 2357-2366
Meijs JAC, Walters RJK & Keen A 1982 Sward methods. In Herbage Intake Handbook, pp. 11 (Ed. JD Leaver). Hurley, UK : British Grassland Society
Moore DA & Varga G 1996 BUN and MUN : Urea nitrogen testing in dairy cattle. Compendium Continuing Education Veterinary 18
712-721
National Research Council 2001 Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle.7th Revision Washington DC, USA: National Academy Press
Reeves M, Fulkerson WJ, Kellaway RC & Dove H 1996 A comparison of three techniques to determine the herbage intake of dairy cows grazing kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 36 23-30
SAS Institute Inc 2002 SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9.1.3. SAS Institute, Cary NC, USA
Schroeder GF, Couderc JJ, Bargo F & Rearte DH 2005 Milk production and fatty acid profile of milk fat by dairy cows fed a winter oats (Avena sativa L.) pasture only or a total mixed ration. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 48 187-195
Schroeder GF, Gagliostro GA, Bargo F, Delahoy JE & Muller LD 2004 Effects of fat supplementation on milk production and composition by dairy cows on pasture: a review. Livestock and Production Science 86 1-18
Soriano FD, Polan CE & Miller CN 2001 Supplementing pasture to lactating Holsteins fed a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science 84 2460-2468
Tilley JM & Terry RA 1963 A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society 18 104-
111
Tucker WB, Rude BJ & Wittayakun S 2001 Case Study : Performance and economics of dairy cows fed a corn silage-based total mixed ration or grazing annual ryegrass during mid to late lactation. Professional Animal Scientist 17 195-201
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB & Lewis BA 1991 Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74 3583-3597
White SL, Benson GA, Washburn SP & Green JT, Jr 2002 Milk production and economic measures in confinement or pasture systems using seasonally calved Holstein and Jersey cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85 95-104
Wildman EE, Jones GM, Wagner PE, Boman RL, Troutt HF & Lesch TN 1982 A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science 65 495-501
Wittwer FG, Gallardo P, Reyes J & Opitz H 1999 Bulk milk urea concentrations and their relationship with cow fertility in grazing
dairy herds in Southern Chile. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 38 159-166
Related topics
Authors:
Join to be able to comment.
Once you join Engormix, you will be able to participate in all content and forums.
* Required information
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Create a post
6 de mayo de 2014
Dear Dr
We have tried as under which works as on per day/animal basis of 10litre milk per day:_
6.5 kg concentrate with Min 18% by-pass-protein,3.5% Fat, less than 10% Fiber,less than 2.5% SS
8-10 kg Green -chaffed
12-15 kg wheat paddy- chaffed
Mix all above AS TMR give 4 times a day
provide 24 hrs fresh running drinking water to animals.
Regards
5 de mayo de 2014
Dear sir,
Green fodder is the most important feed component that brings about maximum increase in milk production immediately. Considering gradual loss f good pastures, the best alternative will be to go for Hydroponics Fodder. Authorities in Goa are reported to have installed Hydroponics fodder producing units and are very satisfied with the results.Hydroponics fodder also is very helpful in ensuring better health and fertility of the cows.
28 de abril de 2014
Dear sir,
I am an animal nutritionist from India. In my area, farmers are using concentrates, roughage separately as feedstuff, whatever available at any quantity. By using their roughage I would like to formulate as total mixed ration as mash or blocks. Here the average milk yield is 10 liters per day. Kindly suggest the nutritional requirement and the tips to adopt the technology at my village and nearby farmers.
Thanks and regards,
Dr Gobinath S
You may be interested in
.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Phileo by Lesaffre