Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

New insights into phytogenics

Published: July 25, 2008
By: Tobias Steiner, PhD - BIOMIN GmbH
New insights into phytogenics - Image 1


Phytogenic concepts in piglets - benefits of a proven approach

Phytogenics represent a promising category of naturally-derived growth promoters originating from herbs and spices. Many phytogenic agents are well known from human nutrition, where they have a long tradition in the flavoring of foods. It is, however, not only their flavoring properties, but also a number of biological activities, which make phytogenics an encouraging approach in animal nutrition. Trials conducted at different universities and research institutes in Europe and in the United States have shown considerable positive effects of phytogenics on growth performance. Significant improvements in feed conversion have been obtained, also in comparison to antibiotic growth promoters. As a consequence of ongoing research, phytogenics are regarded as effective performance enhancers, especially in antibiotic-free feeding systems.


Introduction

The swine production sector is facing several challenges. The removal of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs), for example, has put additional pressure on European swine producers. Consequently, the implementation of sound hygienic farm conditions and elaborate feeding concepts are corner stones of sustainability and profitability in modern swine production. The need for optimal feed efficiency, in terms of feed conversion ratios, becomes even more evident in present times of rising prices for feed ingredients.

Growing concern about AGPs in animal nutrition has created efforts to use different alternative growth-promoting agents in swine nutrition. Among potential candidates, phytogenics represent a new and exciting group of feed additives, originating principally from herbs, spices or other plants. An improvement in feed conversion ratio has been observed in recent trials conducted at different universities and research institutes in Europe and in the United States.


Phytogenics affect feed conversion

Optimizing feed conversion ratio is crucial for efficiency in swine production. A trial was recently carried out at Kansas State University, United States, to evaluate the efficacy of phytogenics in comparison to AGPs in post-weaning piglets (Sulabo et al., 2007). 192 piglets (22 days of age) were assigned to four treatment groups: Group 1 was fed a negative control diet without growth-promoters. Groups 2 and 3 received the negative control diet supplemented with phytogenics. Group 4 was offered a positive control diet containing AGPs (140 g/t neomycin sulfate and 140 g/t oxytetracycline HCl). Growth performance was significantly improved over the negative control group when phytogenics or AGPs were added to the feed. In terms of average daily gains, the pigs fed phytogenics were intermediate between the negative control and the AGPs (Figure 1). Feed conversion, however, was best in the groups receiving phytogenics (Figure 2). The phytogenic feed additive* under investigation contained a defined blend of essential oils from anise, citrus and oregano, as well as plant extracts.


New insights into phytogenics - Image 2
Figure 1. Effects of phytogenics on average daily gain (Kansas State University)


New insights into phytogenics - Image 3
Figure 2. Effects of phytogenics on feed efficiency (Kansas State University)


It can be concluded from the outcome of this trial that well-selected phytogenics can be successfully used to improve growth performance in post-weaning piglets, especially in antibiotic-free feeding regimens. The results from Kansas State University confirmed positive observations obtained in previous experiments. A trial conducted in Denmark by Danske Slagterier also showed an increase in performance when the feed was supplemented with phytogenics. In this trial, 384 pigs (5 weeks of age) were fed either a negative control diet or the negative control diet with supplemental phytogenics*. The feed was pelleted at a minimum temperature of 81ºC. Performance parameters, as recorded from weaning to 50 days post-weaning, are shown in Table 1.


Table 1. Piglet performance in response to phytogenics (Danske Slagterier)

Negative Control

   Phytogenics  

Difference (%)

No. of pens

24

24

No. of piglets

192

192

Daily weight gain (g)

422

444

+ 5.2

Feed intake (FUp1)

0.84

0.85

+ 1.2

Feed conversion ratio

2.01

1.92

- 4.5

Danish Production Value

55.5

61.2

+ 10.3

1 One FUp corresponds to 7.72 MJ net energy


Not only daily gain and feed conversion ratio were improved by 5.2 and 4.5%, respectively. Also the Danish Production Value was increased by 10.3% through supplementation of the feed with phytogenics. The Danish Production Value represents an indicator of productivity and is calculated as follows: (kg gain x DKK/kg gain)-(no. of analyzed FUp x DKK/FUp), with figures being based on average local prices.

Similarly, recent observations from a field trial conducted in South Africa (Carletonville area, North West Province) have shown substantial benefits of phytogenics in weaned pigs. The trial was carried out on a commercial farm and lasted 37 days. Pigs in group A (control) were fed a basal diet containing Tylan (1 kg/t) and zinc oxide (4 kg/t), whereas pigs in group B were fed the basal diet supplemented with phytogenics (Biomin® P.E.P.). As shown in Table 2, considerable improvements in daily weight gain were seen when the pigs were fed phytogenics. Moreover, pigs in group B were more uniform in size at the end of the trial.


Table 2. Fiel trial with weaned pigs (data from South Africa)

Group A
    (Control)   

Group B
(Phytogenics)

No. of piglets

46

34

Weaning age

30

30

Average weaning weight (kg)

8.47

8.76

Average weight (kg) at end of trial

22.93

26.53

Average daily weight gain (g)

391

480



As supported by the above trial data, phytogenics work well in diets with or without antibiotics and could even replace AGPs in feed formulations for swine. Meanwhile, the use of AGPs is also a subject of public criticism in North America and discussions about a potential ban of these substances - following the example of Europe - are anticipated to become more and more substantial. The experience from Europe shows that the ban of AGPs does definitely not leave an insuperable hurdle for swine producers. One reason is that management practices can still be optimized in order to improve hygienic conditions and to minimize the impact of environmental stressors. Furthermore, effective alternative feed additives are available, such as demonstrated in the above trial results.


Phytogenics differ!

Phytogenic feed additives are usually available in the form of dried and ground material, extracts or essential oils. They contain a large number of biological activities, therefore having the potential to beneficially affect gut health and performance. However, phytogenic feed additives usually vary seriously in their chemical composition. Hence, there are large differences in efficacy between phytogenic products in the market. A big challenge for swine producers is to find the suitable product formulation out of an increasing number of phytogenic feed additives which are available. Only formulations which are based on profound scientific research can be expected to deliver sustainably an improvement in growth performance. Although scientific literature about phytogenic agents is multiplying rapidly, there is still a remarkable lack of information regarding the mode of action of phytogenics and the answer to the question: How do phytogenics work in the animal?


How do phytogenics work?

Many herbs and spices are known for their flavoring properties, thus having the potential to stimulate voluntary feed intake - an effect often observed in lactating sows (Miller et al., 2003). In the production of piglets, weaning is an extremely critical point, since the transition from sow's milk to solid feed is a challenge to the young piglets' digestive system, which can easily cause diarrhoea coinciding with dramatic drops in performance. Well-selected phytogenics may stabilize gut health and support digestion during this critical period.

An extensive study, carried out at the University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna (Kroismayr et al., 2005), was directed to discover the mode of action of phytogenics, using the above-mentioned phytogenic additive as model substance in growing pigs. The researchers discovered significant effects caused by the phytogenic additive, with respect to gastrointestinal, as well as blood and immune parameters. Moreover, these effects were associated with improved growth performance.


Conclusion and outlook

Well-investigated phytogenics are an efficient tool to support animal health and growth performance. Since they do not pose any risk regarding antibiotic resistance or residues in animal products such as meat, eggs or milk, phytogenics are expected to gain high consumer's acceptance and are generally regarded as safe alternatives to AGPs. Particular attention, however, has to be paid on the composition of formulations which are available in the market. Only a well-balanced and scientifically developed combination of active ingredients with different properties can be expected to function synergistically in order to bring about the desired benefits for the producer.


Literature is available from the author on request

* The phytogenic feed additive is available under the product name Biomin - P.E.P.
Related topics
Authors:
Tobias Steiner
Agromed Austria GmbH
Recommend
Comment
Share
Chlodwig FRANZ
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
31 de julio de 2008
From the scientific point of view there are always the same problems with such publications: 1) the exact composition is not mentioned (ingredients and percentage) 2) the definition of plants (crude drug or powder) / extracts / essential oils is either missing or unclear, sometimes (semi)synthetic nature-identical substances are used and declared as essential oils or extracts 3) quality data = phytochemical data of the plants/extracts/ess. oils are missing: at least the chemotype of the material and the percentage of the main compounds Due to that no clear relation between substance and effect can be drawn! Most of such publications are therefore nice scientifically decorated (veiled) advertisements. Prof. Chlodwig FRANZ Head of the Institute for Applied Botany and Pharmacognosy University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria
Recommend
Reply
Dan L. McDermott
13 de octubre de 2009
Dr. I agree with your assessment that there are companies representing synthetics as natural EO. I was contacted by one company from Asia which listed its raw material for Oregano Oil as being Orthocresol, metacresol, and 2-chlorine propane. Would this be an example of what to watch out for?
Recommend
Reply
Dr. Justin Tan Yu-Wen
Meriden Animal Health Limited
4 de junio de 2009
I agree fully with Prof. Franz Chlodwig on his comments. Many companies these days claim their product to be phytogenic products, when they are actually not even derived from plants, but synthetically produced. The active components of essential oils can be produced in a nature-identical form with a chemical structure identical to those present in naturally-occurring raw materials and their extracts. To comply with food legislation, nature identical forms require a degree of purity of not less that 99.5[percent] (C. Ariza-Nieto et al., 2005). These purification procedures are expensive and likely to be non-viable for commercial purposes. So whether these procedures are carried out in a proper fashion by such companies, we do not know. True and natural herbal plant products such as essential oils of thyme and oregano normally contain phenolic compounds that can benefit animal production and health. However, certain phenolic compounds such as carvacrol from thyme and oregano can be synthetically produced, but the synthesis of phenols is usually carried out with the reaction of an appropriate phenol (p-cresol) with iso-PrOH in ethylene chloride solution, in the presence of anhydrous AlCl3. As a result, the final product contains significant quantities of all isomers or isopropyl p-cresols. The purification of this mixture by conventional methods for the isolation of pure carvacrol is not easy, nor is it economically feasible. The toxicity of the above reagents (especially p-cresols and AlCl3) is well-known. Besides, even the latest procedures for the synthesis of phenols do not avoid the use of toxic reagents such as compounds containing ferum, aluminium or ruthenium. Therefore, the use of synthetic methyl-(isopropyl) phenols, such as synthetic carvacrol for example, is considered unacceptable in products destined for human or animal consumption. Have they really been widely researched? Has adequate toxicity data been firmly established? Are they really the replacements for AGPs that we are seeking? The use of such so-called phytogenic products containing synthetic or nature-identical substances should be questioned, especially with regards to its safety and suitability for entry into the food chain.
Recommend
Reply
Dan L. McDermott
1 de agosto de 2008
Your comments hold true, although production will adopt to scientific trends with practical successes much faster than science can prove. These ingredient technology trends will lead to similar animal responses across product and geographical variances, convincing me there is not one single phytonutrient or blended ingredient product for all practical challenge and bio-burden variations at the animal production level. Dan L. McDermott DLM Mkting
Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.