Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Variation in Amino Acid Standarized Ileal Digestability of Soybean Meal

Published: November 30, 2012
By: Ramirez E, Price KL, Lee H, Jeffery Escobar (Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA)
Introduction
Heat treatment of soybean meal (SBM) causes amino acid (AA) damage, particularly to lysine. Further, birds and pigs cannot use heat-damaged AA for growth. Lysine is the first- and second- limiting AA in corn-soybean meal diets for pigs and poultry, respectively. Currently, there is no reliable laboratory analysis for the determination of digestible lysine in soybean meal. The objective of this study was to compare SBM AA digestibility using in vivo and vitro procedures.
Materials and Methods
In vivo standardized ileal digestibility (SID, Stein et al. 2007) of AA in 24 SBM samples was determined in 28-d-old Cobb 500 broilers and using a 2-step in vitro digestion process (Wilfart et al. 2007). A semi-purified diet was fed from d 21 to 28 of age where SBM was the only source of protein. Then, birds were euthanized and dissected to collect ileal contents (Lemme et al. 2004). A Complete Randomized Design with 4 pens of 5 birds each per SBM was used and data were analyzed using proc mixed (SAS® Institute, Gary, NC)
Results and Discussion
In vivo Lys SID ranged from 69-93%. Amino acid content of SBM was not correlated (r = -0.16 to 0.21; P = 0.33 to 0.98) with in vivo SID. Increased Lys SID was associated with increased SID of Phe, Leu, Ile, Val, Tyr, Ala, Thr, Glx, Asx, Met, His, and Gly (r² = 0.63 to 0.93; P < 0.001). Correlations among SID for Lys Pro, Arg, and Ser were poor (r² = 0.14 to 0.43; P = 0.001 to 0.003). Lastly, results indicated no association (r² = 0.00 to 0.08; P = 0.17 to 0.99) between in vivo and in vitro SID for any of the AA tested.
Conclusions
It appears that Lys SID may be a good indicator of SID of most other essential AA. Individual AA content of SBM is not a good indicator of its digestibility.
Implications
The lack of correlation between AA level and in vivo SID in SBM supports the practical use an AA-specific digestibility coefficient for different SBM batches. Finally, current in vitro digestibility techniques seemed inadequate in identifying in vivo SID differences and further analytical improvements are needed.
References
Lemme A et al. 2004. World's. Poult. Sci. J. 60:423-437; Stein H et al. 2007. J. Anim. Sci. 85:172-180; Wilfart A et al. 2007. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 141:171-183
Keywords: Amino acid, digestibility, broiler.
Content from the event:
Related topics:
Authors:
Jeffery Escobar
Mazen Animal Health
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Pig Industry
Caroline Gonzalez-Vega
Caroline Gonzalez-Vega
Cargill
Pork Innovation Specialist
United States
Karo Mikaelian
Karo Mikaelian
Trouw Nutrition
United States
Erika Gisela Lin-Hendel
Erika Gisela Lin-Hendel
DSM-Firmenich
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.