Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Swine Management: Take Precautions Against Dust

Published: November 13, 2008
Source : OMAFRA Pork News & Views newsletter
Dropping night-time temperatures bring with them the need for reduced ventilation in swine barns, to conserve heat. This becomes a day-long need when winter arrives, and with it a need for increased awareness of the effect that reduced ventilation can have on pollutant burdens for the animals and the stockperson in the barn. Excessive pollutant burdens can affect animal productivity, as well as human health.

The substances that contaminate animal houses are the consequences of animal production: particles from feed, skin and building materials, gases from metabolism of the animals and microbes that live in and around them, and indeed the microbes themselves from various sources. In reviewing the possible sources of particulate contaminants, researchers have listed every conceivable source down to the attrition of wooden or concrete building materials. No possible source has been overlooked. As well, every possible influence on the concentration of pollutants in the air of confinement buildings has been listed; animal activity, air temperature, relative humidity, ventilation rate, stocking density and volume of air space per animal, feed type and feeding method, type and composition of litter. Each of these could conceivably, in certain situations, be the important factor in a problem environment. There are also many potential interactions between these factors.

"Dust" may refer to any fine particles including liquid droplets as in mists. Generally, however, it means solid particulates small enough to be easily put into suspension in the air and remain suspended for a significant period. To some extent, any material may degrade to fine particles that may become dust, and this accounts for the mix of dust found in confinement buildings. There are two major fractions of interest. The inspirable fraction, often confused with "total" dust, represents that fraction which is likely to be inspired by a human during normal breathing. The respirable fraction represents that fraction which is likely to be carried to the respiratory region of the lungs and so is potentially hazardous to health. The distribution of particles into these fractions depends on the speed of air during inspiration, the aerodynamic characteristics of the dust particles, and the efficiency of particle trapping in the upper respiratory tract.


The Nature of Dust

The dust in a pig house will have many sources and so will consist of many substances and, by the nature of the processes that produce it and affect it afterwards, can be of any number of shapes and sizes. Particles that are large enough to settle out quickly will only be an aerial contaminant for a short period. During feeding or the addition of bedding, however, dust can be in very high concentration. Since an animal's mouth and nose are in close proximity to such sources while eating or rooting it may be presented with a considerable burden of dust. Most of the particles in swine barn dust are in the respirable size range, although on a mass basis the respirable fraction may be small. Studies using microscopy and chemical analysis have found that the dust in pig buildings is predominately feed (on a mass basis). The respirable particles have been found to be mainly faecal material, while larger particles were mainly feed. Livestock environments are rich with micro-organisms, and airborne particles are important carriers of microbes.


Take Precautions

Although efforts are being made to find ways to reduce dust in swine barns, for the time being they are an unavoidable fact of life. Considering the composition of swine barn dust and the concentrations that swine workers may be exposed to, it is important to protect worker health through the use of masks. This is particularly important during long periods of exposure and during winter when dust levels are probably at their worst.


Author: Jaydee Smith - Swine Production Systems Program Lead/OMAFRA
October 2008 Pork News & Views newsletter
Government of Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs

Source
OMAFRA Pork News & Views newsletter
Related topics:
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Pig Industry
Sriraj Kantamneni
Sriraj Kantamneni
Cargill
Global Business Technology Director
United States
Karo Mikaelian
Karo Mikaelian
Trouw Nutrition
United States
Tom Frost
Tom Frost
DSM-Firmenich
Director of Innovation & Application
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.