The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two glucoamylases (GA) and the combination of one GA with a neutral protease on apparent total tract digestibility in beef bulls fed a total mixed ration (TMR) rich in rolled corn. Sixteen Angus beef bulls (266 ± 4.9 kg of initial BW, and 182 ± 1.7 d of age) were distributed in 4 blocks, each block consisted of 4 animals balanced by BW. The experimental design was a 4 × 4 Latin square (4 blocks and 4 periods, 2 w per period). Four treatments were tested; (1) control, (2) GA preparation from Trichoderma reesei (TrGA); (3) GA from Aspergillus fumigatus (AfuGA); (4) AfuGA in combination with a neutral protease from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (BamPro). Apparent total tract digestibility and fecal D-lactate concentration were analyzed. Enzyme supplementation, regardless of enzyme type, increased apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter (from 66.7% to 73.1% ± 2.01), and starch (from 74.7% to 81.8% ± 2.25), without affecting feces D-lactate concentration. Irrespective of glucoamylase type, glucoamylase supplementation improved apparent digestibility of dry matter and starch, and the addition of a protease did not have additional benefits on nutrient digestibility.
Keywords: beef; feed; glucoamylase; protease; total tract digestibility; fecal D-lactate.
1. Owens, F.N.; Secrist, D.S.; Hill, W.J.; Gill, D.R. The Effect of Grain Source and Grain Processing Performance of Feedlot Cattle: A Review. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 75, 868–879. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Drouillard, J.S. Current situation and future trends for beef production in the United States of America—A review. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 31, 1007–1016. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Huntington, G.B. Starch utilization by ruminants: From basics to the bunk. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 75, 852–867. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Owens, F.N.; Zinn, R.A. Corn grain for cattle: Influence of processing on site and extent of digestion. Southwest Nutr. Conf. Univ. Arizona. 2005, 78–85. Available online: http://animal.cals.arizona.edu/swnmc/ 2005/index.htm (accessed on 21 June 2020).
5. Stewart, R.D.; Auffret, M.D.; Warr, A.; Wiser, A.H.; Press, M.O.; Langford, K.W.; Liachko, I.; Snelling, T.J.; Dewhurst, R.J.; Walker, A.W.; et al. Assembly of 913 microbial genomes from metagenomic sequencing of the cow rumen. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 870. [CrossRef]
6. Wang, L.; Zhang, G.; Xu, H.; Xin, H.; Zhang, Y. Metagenomic analyses of microbial and carbohydrate-active enzymes in the rumen of Holstein cows fed different forage-to-concentrate ratios. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1–4. [CrossRef]
7. Yu, S.; Kragh, K.M.; Li, W. Use of low pH active alpha-1,4/1,6-glycoside hydrolases as a feed additive for ruminants to enhance starch digestion. WO 2018/057420 A1. 2018. Available online: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=4&ND=4&adjacent= true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20190829&CC=WO&NR=2018057420A1&KC=A (accessed on 21 June 2020).
8. Shaw, A.; Wallace, L.; Estell DA Hommes RW, J.; Lee, S.; Oh, H.; Sadlowski, E.S. Thermostable Neutral Metalloproteases. U.S. Patent US 8574884 B2, 5 November 2013.
9. McAllister, T.A.; Ribeiro, G. Microbial strategies in the ruminal digestion of starch. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting Brazilian Society Animal Science, Campinas, Brazil, 23 July 2013; pp. 140–151.
10. DiLorenzo, N.; Smith, D.R.; Quinn, M.J.; May, M.L.; Ponce, C.H.; Steinberg, W.; Engstrom, M.A.; Galyean, M.L. Effects of grain processing and supplementation with exogenous amylase on nutrient digestibility in feedlot diets. Livest. Sci. 2011, 137, 178–184. [CrossRef]
11. Vera, J.M.; Smith, H.; ZoBell, D.R.; Young, A.J.; Eun, J.S. Effects of an exogenous proteolytic enzyme on growth performance of beef steers and in vitro ruminal fermentation in continuous cultures. Prof. Anim. Sci. 2012, 28, 452–463. [CrossRef]
12. Christopher, M.M.; Broussard, J.D.; Fallin, C.W.; Drost, N.J.; Peterson, M.E. Increased serum D-lactate associated with diabetic ketoacidosis. Metabolism 1995, 44, 287–290. [CrossRef]
13. Del Estado, B.O. Royal Decree 53/2013 of February 1st on the protection of animals used for experimentation or other scientific purposes. Boletín Oficial del Estado 2013, 34, 11370–11421.
14. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 7th ed.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
15. Grant, R.J.; Dann, H.M.; Woolpert, M.E. Time required for adaptation of behavior, feed intake and dietary digestibility in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93 (Suppl. 3), 312.
16. Machado, M.; Detmann, G.E.; Mantovani, H.C.; Valadares Filho, S.C.; Bento CB, P.; Marcondes, M.I.; Assunçao, A.S. Evaluation of the length of adaptation period for changeover and crossover nutritional experiments with cattle fed tropical forage-based diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2016, 222, 132–148. [CrossRef]
17. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed.; Official Methods of Analysis: Arlington, VA, USA, 1995.
18. Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. Available online: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022030291785512 (accessed on 21 June 2020). [CrossRef]
19. Le Du, Y.L.P.; Penning, P.D. Animal based techniques for estimating herbage intake. In Herbage Intake Handbook; Leaver, J.D., Ed.; Grassland Res. Inst.: Hurley, UK, 1982; pp. 37–75.
20. Larsen, T. Fluorometric determination of D-Lactate in biological fluids. Anal. Biochem. 2017, 539, 152–157.
21. Zinn, R.A.; Adam, C.F.; Tamayo, M.S. Interaction of feed intake level on comparative ruminal and total tract digestion of dry-rolled and steam-flaked corn. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73, 1239–1245. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Owens, C.E.; Zinn, R.A.; Hassen, A.; Owens, N. Mathematical linkage of total tract digestion of starch and neutral detergent fiber to their fecal concentrations and the effect of site of starch digestion on extent of digestion and energetic efficiency of cattle. Profess. Anim. Sci. 2016, 32, 531–549. [CrossRef]
23. Rojo, R.; Mendoza, G.D.; González, S.; Landois, L.; Bárcena, R.; Crosby, M.M. Effects of exogenous amylases from Bacillus licheniformis and Aspergillus niger on ruminal starch digestion and lamb performance. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005, 123, 655–665. [CrossRef]
24. Mota, N.; Mendoza, G.D.; Plata, F.X.; Martínez, J.A.; Lee, H.; Rojo, R.; Crosby, M.M. Effect of exogenous glucoamylase enzymes and reduction of grain level on lamb performance. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2011, 39, 129–131. [CrossRef]
25. Meale, S.J.; Beauchemin, K.A.; Hristov, A.N.; Chaves, A.V.; McAllister, T.A. Opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve ruminant production. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 92, 427–442. [CrossRef]
26. McAllister, T.A.; Cheng, K.J. Microbial strategies in the ruminal digestion of cereal grains. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1996, 62, 29–36. [CrossRef]
27. Grifé, L.; Arís, A.; Bach, A.; García-Fruitós, E. Trends in recombinant protein use in animal production. Microbial Cell Factories 2017, 16, 40.
28. Amaro, F.X.; Arriola, K.G.; Kim, D.; Fernandes, T.; Agarussi, M.C.N.; Silva, V.P.; Cervantes, A.P.; Jiang, Y.; Ferraretto, L.F.; Vyas, D.; et al. The effects of adding exogenous amylases and proteases on ruminal in vitro dry matter and starch digestibility of dent corn grain. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101 (Suppl. 2), 356.
29. Eun, J.S.; Beauchemin, K.A. Effects of proteolytic feed enzyme on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 2140–2153. [CrossRef]
30. Hristov, A.N.; McAllister, T.A.; Cheng, K.J. Intraruminal supplementation with increasing levels of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzymes: Effects on nutrient digestion in cattle fed a barley grain diet. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78, 477–487. [CrossRef]