Recent Trends in Gut Health Management
Published: December 3, 2008
By: Tobias Steiner, Product Manager - Courtesy of Biomin GmbH
Global agriculture is heading towards challenging times, since the world's population continues to grow at an ever increasing rate. Thus, consumers' demand for sufficient supply of high-quality safe food is a main goal. Decreasing acceptance of antibiotic drugs in many parts of the world and the concomitant debates about residues and contaminations in animal products are driving factors in the search for new and sustainable concepts.
On the other hand, producers cope with increasing production costs and growing market pressure, fuelled by increasing prices for energy, raw materials and labor. In consequence, the utilization of inputs has to become much more efficient.
From the standpoint of animal nutrition, this means feed conversion ratios must be dramatically improved in the near future, while reducing mortalities and medication costs at the same time.
On the other hand, producers cope with increasing production costs and growing market pressure, fuelled by increasing prices for energy, raw materials and labor. In consequence, the utilization of inputs has to become much more efficient.
From the standpoint of animal nutrition, this means feed conversion ratios must be dramatically improved in the near future, while reducing mortalities and medication costs at the same time.
New concepts are required to master all the challenges ahead. Thus, the animal production sector will have to respond with appropriate tools. Obviously, all the surrounding conditions point to one direction: Implementation of safe, sustainable and profitable production techniques.
Natural Growth Promoters have been a key research area in BIOMIN since the founding days of the company. The idea of Natural Growth Promotion has been developed to provide powerful and sustainable feeding concepts based on gut health management through natural feed ingredients.
The digestive tract is a vital organ in which feed is reconstituted biochemically into body growth. This is a huge metabolic effort, and unquestionably, only a healthy digestive tract is capable of dealing with this effort in a competitive biodiverse environment and under sometimes challenging external conditions.
The digestive tract is a vital organ in which feed is reconstituted biochemically into body growth. This is a huge metabolic effort, and unquestionably, only a healthy digestive tract is capable of dealing with this effort in a competitive biodiverse environment and under sometimes challenging external conditions.
The fundamental objective is to keep this important organ healthy, thereby maintaining its functionality on a high and efficient level. The gut microflora is an active participant in this digestive process, being influenced by diet, host physiology, as well as environmental factors and stress. Conway (1994) referred to the relationship as "the gut ecosystem", as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. The gut eco system (according to Conway, 1994)
In a healthy animal, the gut microflora consists mainly of beneficial bacteria (e.g. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium or Bacteroidaceae), but also a small portion of potentially pathogenic bacteria (e.g. Salmonella, E. coli, Clostridia, Campylobacter, Brachyspira) is present. It is of major interest to keep the gut microflora under control, because, to a certain extent, gut microorganisms compete with the host animal through
Figure 1. The gut eco system (according to Conway, 1994)
In a healthy animal, the gut microflora consists mainly of beneficial bacteria (e.g. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium or Bacteroidaceae), but also a small portion of potentially pathogenic bacteria (e.g. Salmonella, E. coli, Clostridia, Campylobacter, Brachyspira) is present. It is of major interest to keep the gut microflora under control, because, to a certain extent, gut microorganisms compete with the host animal through
- consumption of dietary energy
- degradation and utilization of dietary amino acids
- production of toxic metabolites
- creating the demand for immune response.
Furthermore, a shift in the composition of the gut microflora towards non-beneficial or pathogenic microbes can easily result in the outbreak of diseases and the spread of these bacteria across the production chain. In this connection, certain pathogens are supposed to gain more importance in the years to come. As Salmonella control measures were implemented, other pathogens gain more importance. For example, Campylobacter sp. is causing more public concerns than Salmonella. Research emphasis therefore focuses on finding natural substances with the capability of counteracting relevant pathogenic microorganisms.
Huge Potential for Phytogenics
Phytogenic compounds, including herbs, spices and essential oils, have been gaining tremendous attention in human health as well as animal feeding programs during the last few years. Their use has a long history in human consumption as flavors, fragrances and medicines. Their beneficial effects have been shown in a vast number of scientific reports pertaining to their antimicrobial, antifungal, antioxidant and many other biological activities. Nowadays, these compounds have been used more and more frequently as animal feed additives. In deed, a growing number of scientific and field reports show that these compounds exert substantial performance-enhancing effects in animals (Kroismayr et al., 2008a; Windisch et al., 2008). Hence, phytogenic substances are considered to be well accepted by consumers due to their natural character and proven efficacy. Figure 2 illustrates the three general features of phytogenics, which make them attractive in animal nutrition.
Figure 2. Features of phytogenics in animal nutrition
Figure 2. Features of phytogenics in animal nutrition
In vitro Screening for Antimicrobial Activity
It is commonly accepted that phytogenics have strong antimicrobial activities, which is a main reason for their overall beneficial effects on digestibility and metabolism. A first step in product development therefore includes a large number of tests and screenings under in vitro conditions. In such experiments, potential compounds are tested for their antimicrobial activity against several relevant pathogens.
Three different methods were established at the BIOMIN Research Center (Tulln, Austria) to determine the antimicrobial activity of different plant products. In these test systems the antimicrobial activity is examined by observing the bacterial growth.
- The agar diffusion method serves as a pre-screening. It is easy to handle but not very sensitive.
- The turbidimetric microplate method offers an accurate test system with reproducible results and adequate effort.
- The microplate method according to Eloff passes a redox reaction making it the most sensitive, but also most expensive and labor-intensive method.
Whereas the first method is only followed by a yes-or-no decision, the two latter methods allow for determining the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), which is defined as the concentration of test substance that inhibits 50% (or more) of the bacterial growth. The procedure of the turbidimetric microplate method requires a well-grown culture of the respective bacterial strain and several dilution steps of the test substance. The 96 wells of the microplate are filled according to a definite layout. During 24 hours of incubation the optical density is measured every hour to monitor bacterial growth continuously. The amount of bacterial cells finally corresponds with the optical density measured in the wells. In wells where the concentration of the test substance meets the MIC, bacterial growth is inhibited and the optical density remains low (Figure 3). The antimicrobial effect of oregano usually varies as a result of differences in variety, location of growth, harvest time, extraction procedures and hence ingredient composition. An example showing the growth-inhibiting effect of a specific oregano oil (MTP21) against Salmonella typhimurium is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 3. Example of a microplate after 24 hours of incubation. Turbid indicate refer to intensive bacterial growth
Figure 4. Bacterial growth and inhibition of Salmonella typhimurium by the use of oregano oil MTP21 in five dilution steps
In vivo Testing in Animal Feeding Trials
Finally, after all the in vitro work resulted in a sophisticated product formulation, the additive is tested under in vivo conditions. With Biomin® P.E.P., a large and growing number of reports is available for different species including pigs, poultry, calves and fish. Due to the constant testing of the product in scientific and field trials, new data is generated continually showing the benefits of Biomin® P.E.P. under different conditions and in different locations.
The effects of Biomin® P.E.P. on the gut microflora were investigated in a PhD project in Austria (Kroismayr et al., 2008b). In order to have a positive control, one group of pigs was fed Avilamycin, an antibiotic that was routinely used in the EU as growth promoter prior to the ban in 2006. Results are shown in Table 1 for the ileum and caecum.
Table 1. Effects of phytogenics and Avilamycin on colony counts [log CFU per g fresh matter] in the ileum (Kroismayr et al., 2008b)
a,b Significant difference between treatments (P<0.05)
A,B Tendency towards significant difference between treatments (P<0.1)
Pigs fed Biomin® P.E.P. had a reduced gut microflora, with the portion of beneficial bacteria increasing relative to the portion of undesired bacteria. Thus, there was less competition between the host animal and its gut microflora, and finally, pigs fed the phytogenic additive were able to perform better (Figure 5). Twenty-one days after weaning, average daily gain (ADG) and FCR were improved by 5.9 and 1.9%, respectively, when the pigs were fed phytogenic. This trend was also obtained after 50 days.
Figure 5. Change (%) of average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) in pigs fed Biomin® P.E.P. or Avilamycin in relation to Control pigs (Kroismayr et al., 2008b)
Conclusion
Gut health management should be based on the implication of sound and sustainable feeding strategies. Within a range of potential alternatives, phytogenics are highly promising. They possess not only flavoring properties, but also exert biological activities and have pronounced performance-enhancing efficacy. Their beneficial effects have been shown in vitro and in vivo and finally their mode of action turns feed inputs into higher performance and profitability.
Literature:
Steiner, T. (2006) Managing Gut Health - Natural Growth Promoters as a Key to Animal Performance. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Literature:
Steiner, T. (2006) Managing Gut Health - Natural Growth Promoters as a Key to Animal Performance. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Kroismayr A., Sehm J., Pfaffl M.W., Schedle K., Plitzner C., Windisch W. (2008a) Effects of Avilamycin and essential oils on mRNA expression of apoptotic and inflammatory markers and gut morphology of piglets. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 53, 377-387.
Kroismayr A., Schedle K., Sehm J., Pfaffl M.W., Plitzner C., Foissy H., Ettle T., Mayer H., Schreiner M., Windisch W. (2008b) Effects of antimicrobial feed additives on gut microbiology and blood parameters of weaned piglets. Die Bodenkultur. In press.
Windisch W.M., Schedle K., Plitzner C., Kroismayr A. (2008) Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. J. Anim. Sci. 86(E. Suppl.), E140-E148.
Related topics
Authors:
Agromed Austria GmbH
Recommend
Comment
Share
30 de mayo de 2011
Excelent article.
Recommend
Reply
5 de diciembre de 2008
That's good...
Recommend
Reply
4 de diciembre de 2008
Good article. This is a fact that balance of gut microflora depends upon various factors, among them ingredients of the diet, environmental temperature, processing of feed, condition/kind of litter, etc. For a bird to keep a good balance of microflora is not a simple process and if this balance is disturbed then procedure to restore to normal condition is also not that easy. In humans, way of treatment is different as a human can tell his feeling after a medication and doctor can change the treatment immediately. But for animals/birds, mode of action of treatment depends upon lab reports, postmortem report, observation of farm manager and once treatment is started then it is always too late to change the treatment without causing much damage, therefore, in animal world, as a veterinarian, we have to be very sure to start a treatment. We always like to depend on trusted and tested methods. Therefore, antibiotics are, most of the time, first line of treatment in case of a disease outbreak.
However, for prevention, methods may differ and sometimes persons do try other methods and non antibiotic approach. In many European countries, there is a ban on use of antibiotics growth promoters, therefore, it is compulsory for scientists to find alternatives ways. Then concepts like phytogenics, nutricines, etc emerge but all the alternate methods has a limited success, rather their long time use creating more problems than prevention. Therapeutic use of antibiotics, now is almost double than before the ban of AGPs.
I believe, use of antibiotics to control harmful gut microflora and to create that favorable environment in gut are the best in all conditions but the success of other methods depends on many other factors discussed above.
Recommend
Reply
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
You may be interested in
.jpg&w=3840&q=75)