Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

How Mud Can Affect Animal Performance

Published: February 5, 2008
Source : Virginia Tech Cooperative Extension
While mired tractors and sucked-off boots are annoying reminders of the inconveniences of mud, its effect on animal performance is often overlooked. Animal performance, whether that is making milk or lbs. of growth, is determined by the nutrients the animal is consuming, one of which is energy.

As the environmental temperature decreases below the thermo-neutral zone the maintenance energy requirement increases. The thermo-neutral zone is between 23º- 77ºF, depending on cattle age and size. The maintenance energy requirement is the amount of energy required to maintain an animal, not including growing, producing milk, or maintaining pregnancy.

Exposure to mud affects the energy requirement of cattle in two ways. First, the animal has to exert more energy to move from point A to point B. Second, mud caked to the animal decreases their insulating capabilities. The caked mud acts as a “wick” that draws energy out of the animal in cold temperatures. Table 1 shows the negative effect different depths of mud, relative to the animal, has on weight gain.

As seen in the table housing cattle in mud not only looks bad, but can also be expensive. Loss of potential gain affects the overall feed efficiency of the animal, translating into a higher cost per lb. of gain. Another consideration when reviewing Table 1, it takes less mud to reach the hock on younger cattle. This cost is further compounded by current high feed cost. As you look at your operation this winter consider the following:

►If using movable hay feeders and/or troughs, move feeders often to minimize manure/mud accumulation
►Consider rolling round bales of hay out
►Rotate feeding areas
►Restrict cattle access to poorly drained areas
►Scrape feeding pads more often


Table 1. Loss of gain caused by mud, 21 to 39ºF

Mud Depth on the Animal

Potential Loss of Gain

No Mud

0 %

Dewclaw Deep

7 %

Shin Deep

14 %

Below Hock

21 %

Hock Deep

28 %

Belly Deep

35 %



Reference:

Beef Feeder. 1991. A sure cure to sure footing. University of Nebraska Institute of Agriculture.


By M. Chase Scott, Extension Agent, Southwest Virginia. Published on Dairy Pipeline.
Source
Virginia Tech Cooperative Extension
Related topics:
Recommend
Comment
Share
Dr. Nathu Ram Sarker, Sarker
Dr. Nathu Ram Sarker, Sarker
6 de febrero de 2008
This information will helps the farmers not to keep the animals in the mud. If the animals were grazed in the mud field, then the foot of the animals should be washed with water for better production and comfort.
Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Dairy Cattle
Jim Quigley
Jim Quigley
Cargill
Technical Lead - Calf & Heifer at Cargill
United States
Pietro Celi
Pietro Celi
DSM-Firmenich
DSM-Firmenich
United States
Todd Bilby, Ph.D.
Todd Bilby, Ph.D.
MSD - Merck Animal Health
Dairy Technical Services Manager
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.