Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

Effect of Pregnancy and Dry Period on Raw Milk Quality of Water Buffalo in Chitwan, Nepal

Published: December 10, 2021
By: Sagar Regmi 1, Sachin Regmi 1, Saroj Bista 1, Utsav Lamichhane 1, Anil Kumar Tiwary 2 and Rajendra Bashyal 2 / 1 Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal; 2 Faculty of Animal Science Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Physiology & Biochemistry, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal.
INTRODUCTION
Asian buffalo or water buffalo is classified under the genus Bubalus, species bubalis. Buffalo contributes about 12.39% of the total milk produced from all dairy species at global level [1]. On average, 120.15 million tons of milk are produced by buffalo, out of which India and Pakistan contribute 71.7% and 22.71%, respectively [2].
Geographically, Nepal is divided into five plains: Terai plain, Siwalik Hills, Lesser Himalaya, Higher Himalaya and Tibetan – Tethys [3]. The ecological diversity of Nepal plays a pivotal role in determining the breed of buffalo to be reared in specific topography.
High producing swamp type and crossbred are raised in Himalayan region, swamp type crossbred with Murrah in hills, and crosses with Murrah or riverine type in plain. About 5,177,998 buffaloes are present in Nepal based on the recent data. Out of the total population of buffalo, only 1,509,512 of them are lactating.
About 1245954 metric tons of milk is produced each year by buffalo which is greater than cow milk produced i.e., 665285 metric tons [4]. Based on recent data, income from agriculture holds 26.8% of national GDP. Out of this 13% of contribution belongs to livestock sector and 6% of income from livestock sector comes from buffaloes [5].
Milk is a good source of protein and other nutrients essential for growth and to provide energy to humans. The composition of buffalo milk is influenced by various factors that can either be animal factors or environmental factors.
Animal factors like breed and species differences, parity, age, size, pregnancy etc. and environmental factors like season, humidity, and temperature play an important role in determining the milk yield and composition.
Pregnancy leads to the surge of hormones which is essential for the development of fetus whereas it causes regression of mammary gland [6].
As the fetus continues to grow, larger amount of nutrients is required for the growth and development of fetus. The nutrients are drained from the body pool leaving lower amount of nutrients for milk production. This effect is prominent after 4-5 months of pregnancy [7].
Many types of research are being carried out to determine the effects of dry period length on milk parameters in subsequent lactation. The main aim of our study is to determine the effect of pregnancy and lactation length on milk composition and yield. Based on the results it is more beneficial to shorten the dry period length than the traditional system.
Shortening the dry period brings uniformity in feeding throughout the lactation-gestation cycle which will ultimately enhance the production [8]. Dry period length depends on various parameters like parity, level of production, calving interval, etc.[9].
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area
Field based survey was conducted within milk cooperatives and individual farmers across Chitwan district. The survey was conducted in Tadi, Madi, Bharatpur, Rampur, Sharadanagar, Chanuli, Shivaghat and Padampur area located within Chitwan district, Nepal. Majority of the farmers were found to be rearing buffaloes in semi-intensive system for life sustenance rather than commercial purposes(Figure 1).
Effect of Pregnancy and Dry Period on Raw Milk Quality of Water Buffalo in Chitwan, Nepal - Image 1
Sampling techniques and data collection
Primary data were collected by directly interviewing the farmer with the help of well-designed closed-ended questionnaire. Data were also collected from various dairy co-operatives located in Chitwan. 154 milk samples of water buffaloes were collected from the farmers and dairy co-operatives located within the study site.
The samples collected were placed within the ice box and transported towards the lab facility. Thus obtained milk samples were homogenized and analyzed in laboratory using AkashgangaMilk Analyzer, AMA-Mini-40 to determine the in milk constituents. The result obtained was interpreted and analyzed to determine the influence of multiple parameters like pregnancy, dry period and lactation length, etc., on milk composition.
Data analysis
The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS v24. Independent T-test was done to determine the effect of pregnancy in milk composition. ANOVA test was carried out to determine the relation between dry period, milk composition and total milk yield. Chi-square test is carried out to determine the level of significance.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Effect of pregnancy on raw milk quality
Fat content in the milk of pregnant and non-pregnant buffalo was found to be 6.15±0.21 and 6.44±0.24 respectively. The study revealed that fat content of pregnant buffalo showed no significant difference (p=0.384) than non-pregnant one. So there is no effect of pregnancy on fat content of milk based on our result.
The result was also supported by Sharma [10]. The fat level shows a constant increase over the advancing post-conception weeks. This increment in fat content of milk may be due to the decreasing milk yield resulting in more concentration of fat [11].
Protein content of the milk was significantly different (p< 0.05) in pregnant cases. The higher protein content in pregnant animal can be co-related with the increase in the rate of anabolism of major nutrients to feed the fetus. Similar findings were also obtained by Casoli, Dell'Aquila[12,13] in sheep.
Pregnancy is the only factor that significantly (p< 0.05) affects the composition of lactose in the milk. Lactose is the main constituent determining the milk volume (Table 1). The finding of our study was in line with the result of Mech[14].
Effect of Pregnancy and Dry Period on Raw Milk Quality of Water Buffalo in Chitwan, Nepal - Image 2
Effect of Pregnancy and Dry Period on Raw Milk Quality of Water Buffalo in Chitwan, Nepal - Image 3
There is no significant difference (p> 0.1) in the milk density of pregnant and non-pregnant buffalo. But milk density is affected by various other factors like temperature, processing of milk etc. The variation in fat content is known to be the main reason of change in milk density [15].
SNF content is higher in the milk of pregnant buffalo than the non-pregnant one (p< 0.05). SNF content in the milk raises initially up to 8-10 weeks and then decreases gradually advancing pregnancy.
The result of our research is also supported by the findings of Khan [16]. SNF content of milk is altered by various factors like nutrition, age, disease, stage of lactation etc.
Effect of dry period on raw milk quality
The result showed that with the increase in length of dry period, total yield goes on decreasing (0.05< p< 0.1). Dry period of length 60 days is must to maintain the milk production in subsequent lactation. Sørensen&Enevoldsen, Wilton, Madsen and Rastani[17-20] also suggested that dry periods of around 30 to 35 days resulted in decreased milk yield in the next lactation compared to cows with dry period of 60 days.
Shorter dry period leads to a decrease in production during subsequent lactation because of reduced mammary epithelial cell turnover and reduced secretory capacity [21].
Similarly, the longer dry period will result in greater feed costs with no income as it is in non-secretory stage. So it is a must to maintain accurate dry period length so as to provide sufficient time for regeneration of mammary gland.
Dry period length also varies according to parity, calving interval, level of milk production, management practices etc.
There is no significant effect (p> 0.05) of dry period length on fat content of buffalo milk. Similarly, a non-significant increase in milk fat percentage was reported in dairy cows by Santschi [22] in the cattle with shortened or no dry period.
Similar to our results, Kuhn [23] also reported that short dry period was beneficial for fat percentage in the subsequent lactation of Jersey cows. The research depicted that only the salt content of milk shows significant difference with variation in length of dry period (p< 0.5) Table 2.
Effect of Pregnancy and Dry Period on Raw Milk Quality of Water Buffalo in Chitwan, Nepal - Image 4
CONCLUSION
On the basis of the findings of our research, it can be concluded that pregnancy affects all the constituents of milk but SNF, protein, lactose and salt are affected most. The dry period length shows significant effect only on salt content of milk. In our country, buffaloes are reared by the farmers as a subsidiary occupation to sustain rural livelihood. So commercialization of this business is must to enhance the national economy of our country as the income from agriculture holds a major position in national GDP. Buffalo breeds are known for their high efficiency to utilize low-quality roughages and sustain in poor quality husbandry practices.
Hence further research should be conducted using large sample size for precise results and for validation of the present result.
   
This article was originally published in Advances in Dairy Research 8: 235. doi: 10.35248/2329-888X.19.8.2.235. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

1. Singh C, Veterinaria RBR. Buffalo breeding research and improvement strategies in India. cabdirect.org.2019.
2. Year F, Year T. Men livestock. 2020;2017-2020.
3. Upreti BN. An overview of the stratigraphy and tectonics of the
Nepal Himalaya. J Asian Earth Sci. 1999;17(5–6):577-606.
4. Science V. Proceedings of International Buffalo Symposium. 2017.
5. Karki YK. Nepal Portfolio Performance Review (NPPR).
MinistAgricDev (MoAD), Kathmandu, Nepal, India. 2015.
6. Bachman KC, Hayen MJ, Morse D, Wilcox CJ. Effect of pregnancy, milk yield, and somatic cell count on bovine milk fat hydrolysis. J Dairy Sci. 1988;71(4):925-931.
7. Olori V, Brotherstone S, Hill W, Production BML. Effect of gestation stage on milk yield and composition in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Elsevier. 2019;14.
8. Theriogenology RG. Strategies to improve fertility of high yielding dairy farms: Management of the dry period. Elsevier. 2019.
9. Grummer RR, Rastani RR. Why re-evaluate dry period length? J
Dairy Sci. 2004.
10. Sharma AK, Wilcox CJ, Martin FG, Thatcher WW. Effects of stage of lactation and pregnancy and their interactions on milk yield and constituents. J Dairy Sci. 2010;73(6):1586-1592.
11. Khan S, Qureshi MS, Ahmed I, Shah SM. Milk composition and yield changes with advancing pregnancy in dairy buffaloes (Bubalusbubalis). Turkish J Vet Anim Sci. 2011;35(6):375-380.
12. Casoli C, Duranti E, Morbidini L.Quantitative and compositional variations of Massese sheep milk by parity and stage of lactation.
Elsevier. 2019.
13. Dell’Aquila S, Pilla AM, Catillo G, Scardella G, Taibi L. Milk yield of Comisana, DelleLanghe, Massese, Sarda and crossbred ewes.
ZootecNutr Anim. 1993;14:95-102.
14. Mech A, Dhali A, Prakash B, Rajkhowa C. Variation in milk yield and milk composition during the entire lactation period in
Mithun cows (Bosfrontalis). 2008
15. Walstra P, Jenness R. Dairy chemistry & physics. John Wiley &
Sons, NY, USA. 1984.
16. Khan S, Ahmad N, Qureshi MS, Amjed M, Younas M, Durani F.
Effect of gestation stage on milk production in dairy buffalo.
2008;24(2).
17. Sørensen JT, Enevoldsen C. Effect of dry period length on milk production in subsequent lactation. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74(4):
1277-1283.
18. Wilton JW, Burnside EB, Rennie JC. The effects of days dry and days open on the milk and butterfat production of HolsteinFriesian cattle. Can J Anim Sci. 1967;47(1):85-90.
19. Madsen TG, Nielsen MO, Andersen JB, Ingvartsen KL.
Continuous lactation in dairy cows: Effect on milk production and mammary nutrient supply and extraction. J Dairy Sci.
2008;91(5):1791-1801.
20. Rastani RR, Grummer RR, Bertics SJ, Gümen A, Wiltbank MC,
Mashek DG, et al. Reducing dry period length to simplify feeding transition cows: Milk production, energy balance, and metabolic profiles. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88(3):1004–1014.
21. Annen EL, Collier RJ, McGuire MA, Vicini JL, Ballam JM,
Lormore MJ. Effect of modified dry period lengths and bovine somatotropin on yield and composition of milk from dairy cows. J
Dairy Sci. 2004;87(11):3746-3761.
22. Santschi DE, Lefebvre DM, Cue RI, Girard CL, Pellerin D.
Complete-lactation milk and component yields following a short (35-d) or a conventional (60-d) dry period management strategy in commercial Holstein herds. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94(5):2302-2311.
23. Kuhn MT, Hutchison JL, Norman HD. Dry period length in US
Jerseys: Characterization and effects on performance. J Dairy Sci.
2007;90(4):2069-2081.

Related topics
Authors:
Dr Sachin Regmi
Follow
Join to be able to comment.
Once you join Engormix, you will be able to participate in all content and forums.
* Required information
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Create a post
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.
LoginRegister