The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of dietary energy levels on carcass yield of Hillbilly (French exotic country-type) broilers. The study was conducted in an experimental shed, Federal Rural University of Amazonia (UFRA) located in Parauapebas, PA, Brazil. One hundred and ninety two, one-day-old, as hatched, French exotic hillbilly chickens were reared in an intensive production system. The experimental design was completely randomized, and it included three treatments with four replicates each. The experimental unit was 1 pen containing 16 birds. Two different feeds (starter: 1 - 28 days; grower: 29 - 90 days) were used. Treatments consisted of various dietary energy levels, i.e., T1: 3,000/3,100 kcal/kg, T2: 3,100/3,200 kcal/kg; and T3: 3,200/3,300 kcal/ kg. At experiment completion (77, 84, and 90 days), two birds per pen were identified and weighed. The variables studied included carcass yield, breast weight, leg weight and thigh weight, and relative weights of wings, back, legs and head+neck. The statistical analysis was performed using the ANOVA procedure for a randomized model with the Statistical and Genetics Analysis System (SAEG, 2007). Differences among variable means were compared by Tukey´s test at the level of 5%. The various dietary energy levels did not influence thigh relative weights, or those of, wings, backs, feet, head+neck of birds processed at 77, 84, and 90 days of age. Birds fed the diets containing 3,000/3,100 or 3,100/3,200 kcal/kg showed improved dressing percent and improved relative breast weight, when processed at 77 days.
Key Words: Hillbilly exotic French chickens, Carcass, Metabolizable energy.
|
Treatments
|
77 days
|
84 days
|
90 days
|
CV (%)
|
|
Carcass yield
|
|
|||
|
T1 - 3,000 and 3,100 kcal ME/kg
|
80.72abAB
|
82.41aA
|
84.10aB
|
3.52
|
|
T2 - 3,100 and 3,200 kcal ME/kg
|
82.20aA
|
82.35aA
|
79.87aA
|
7.20
|
|
T3 - 3,200 and 3,300 kcal ME/kg
|
76.42bA
|
81.36aA
|
80.37aA
|
6.78
|
|
CV (%)
|
5.64
|
9.76
|
8.74
|
|
|
|
Breast weight
|
|
||
|
T1 - 3,000 and 3,100 kcal ME/kg
|
23.20abAB
|
21.60aB
|
25.06aA
|
9.10
|
|
T2 - 3,100 and 3,200 kcal ME/kg
|
24.26aA
|
20.57aA
|
23.27aA
|
12.70
|
|
T3 - 3,200 and 3,300 kcal ME/kg
|
21.84bA
|
22.35aA
|
23.16aA
|
5.82
|
|
CV (%)
|
5.69
|
12.82
|
7.07
|
|
|
|
Thigh weight
|
|
||
|
T1 - 3,000 and 3,100 kcal ME/kg
|
13.65aA
|
14.13aA
|
13.76aA
|
9.64
|
|
T2 - 3,100 and 3,200 kcal ME/kg
|
13.59aA
|
13.73aA
|
13.97aA
|
8.25
|
|
T3 - 3,200 and 3,300 kcal ME/kg
|
13.73aA
|
14.04aA
|
13.85aA
|
6.49
|
|
CV (%)
|
6.48
|
8.76
|
8.74
|
|
|
|
Leg weight
|
|
||
|
T1 - 3,000 and 3,100 kcal ME/kg
|
12.82aA
|
13.30aA
|
13.56aA
|
5.80
|
|
T2 - 3,100 and 3,200 kcal ME/kg
|
13.51aA
|
12.88aA
|
13.30aA
|
11.27
|
|
T3 - 3,200 and 3,300 kcal ME/kg
|
12.60aB
|
12.77aB
|
13.62aA
|
6.86
|
|
CV (%)
|
6.96
|
10.86
|
7.98
|
|
|
Treatments
|
77 days
|
84 days
|
90 days
|
CV (%)
|
|
Wings
|
|
|||
|
T1 - 3,000 and 3,100 kcal ME/kg
|
10.56aA
|
10.65aA
|
10.15aA
|
6.29
|
|
T2 - 3,100 and 3,200 kcal ME/kg
|
10.63aA
|
10.31aA
|
10.31aA
|
7.99
|
|
T3 - 3,200 and 3,300 kcal ME/kg
|
10.52aA
|
10.57aA
|
10.59aA
|
3.52
|
|
CV (%)
|
6.12
|
6.57
|
5.10
|
|
|
|
Back
|
|
||
|
T1 - 3,000 and 3,100 kcal ME/kg
|
18.60aB
|
23.56aA
|
18.58aB
|
17.61
|
|
T2 - 3,100 and 3,200 kcal ME/kg
|
21.06aA
|
21.53aA
|
19.48aA
|
8.69
|
|
T3 - 3,200 and 3,300 kcal ME/kg
|
21.69aA
|
22.24aA
|
19.68aA
|
5.96
|
|
CV (%)
|
14.31
|
9.51
|
6.39
|
|
|
|
Feet
|
|
||
|
T1 - 3,000 and 3,100 kcal ME/kg
|
4.87aA
|
5.19aAB
|
4.21aB
|
13.04
|
|
T2 - 3,100 and 3,200 kcal ME/kg
|
4.72aA
|
4.25aA
|
4.24aA
|
16.57
|
|
T3 - 3,200 and 3,300 kcal ME/kg
|
4.85aA
|
4.70aA
|
4.32aA
|
13.29
|
|
CV (%)
|
11.60
|
25.00
|
11.63
|
|
|
|
Head + Neck
|
|
||
|
T1 - 3,000 and 3,100 kcal ME/kg
|
11.95aA
|
10.62aA
|
11.33aA
|
24.94
|
|
T2 - 3,100 and 3,200 kcal ME/kg
|
9.55aA
|
10.31aA
|
11.06aA
|
11.85
|
|
T3 - 3,200 and 3,300 kcal ME/kg
|
10.76aA
|
10.30aA
|
10.99aA
|
11.52
|
|
CV (%)
|
10.08
|
12.89
|
8.46
|
|
