Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

Efficacy of Nicarbazin/Monensin a Novel Coccidiostat Combination Product in the Control of Coccidiosis in Broilers

Published: October 21, 2022
By: M. MARIEN, B. DEHAECK, M. VEREECKEN, M. GEERINCKX, R. SERWATA and K. DE GUSSEM / Huvepharma, Antwerp, Belgium.
Summary

The efficacy of nicarbazin/monensin at a concentration of 40mg/kg (40ppm) nicarbazin and 40mg/kg (40ppm) monensin, administered in feed was assessed in broilers after an experimental coccidiosis challenge under battery cage conditions. The efficacy of nicarbazin/monensin for the prevention of coccidiosis in broilers was demonstrated based on significantly improved growth rates and feed efficiency in the nicarbazin/monensin treated birds than in the untreated control group.

I. INTRODUCTION
Anticoccidials remain an essential tool in the prevention and control of coccidiosis, which is still one of the most important diseases contributing to gut health disorders. Many anticoccidials have been available for use for considerable periods of time. Monimax® (nicarbazin/monensin) is a novel coccidiostat for coccidiosis control in broilers.
II. METHOD
The efficacy of nicarbazin/monensin (Monimax® supplied by Huvepharma®, Belgium) at a concentration of 40mg/kg (40ppm) nicarbazin and 40mg/kg (40ppm) monensin, administered in feed was assessed in broilers after an experimental coccidiosis challenge under battery cage conditions.
Birds were reared without coccidiostats until 14 days of age when they were allocated to the different groups. Nicarbazin/monensin treated birds were compared to i) infected untreated control (IUC) and ii) uninfected untreated control (UUC) groups. Each group consisted of 7 replicate cages each containing 5 Ross 308 males.
At 17 days of age all birds in the IUC and nicarbazin/monensin groups were inoculated with a mixture of Eimeria acervulina, E. maxima and E. tenella (all of European origin). The UUC birds were sham inoculated.
Daily weight gain (DWG), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and intestinal lesion scores (ILS) were compared. Statistical analysis was performed in accordance with those outlined in the WAAVP guidelines for evaluating anticoccidial drugs in chickens and turkeys (Holdsworth et al., 2004). All tests were 2-sided and the level of significance was set at 5%.
III. RESULTS
The challenge was successful as shown by the significantly lower DWG, increased FCR and significantly higher average ILS (total ILS and E. tenella ILS) in the IUC compared to the UUC.
Administration of nicarbazin/monensin was able to significantly improve performance (DWG and FCR) in the acute infection phase (D17-D23).
Figure 1 - Daily Weight Gain (DWG) in g per day per animal for the different study periods
Figure 1 - Daily Weight Gain (DWG) in g per day per animal for the different study periods
Figure 2 – Feed conversion ratio (FCR) for the different study periods
Figure 2 – Feed conversion ratio (FCR) for the different study periods
Although not statistically significant, the total ILS at D23 tended to be lower in the nicarbazin/monensin supplemented group in comparison to the IUC.
Table 1 - Average lesion scores (LS) on study D23 per treatment group for the species Eimeria acervulina, E. maxima, E. tenella and for the total lesion score.*
Table 1 - Average lesion scores (LS) on study D23 per treatment group for the species Eimeria acervulina, E. maxima, E. tenella and for the total lesion score.*
IV. DISCUSSION
The results from this trial demonstrate the efficacy of nicarbazin/monensin in reducing the impact of coccidiosis in broilers. Under the present study conditions, we can conclude, based on significantly better growth rate and feed efficiency performance, that the administration of nicarbazin/monensin is efficacious in reducing the impact of coccidiosis infection in broilers. The number of animals included in the study appeared to be too small to draw conclusions on the effect of nicarbazin/monensin on lesion scores.
    
Presented at the 32th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium 2021. For information on the next edition, click here.

Holdsworth PA, Conway DP, McKenzie ME, Dayton AD, Chapman HD, Mathis GF, Skinner JT, Mundt HC & Williams RB (2004) Veterinary Parasitology 121: 189-212.

Related topics
Authors:
Maja Marien
Follow
Dehaeck Ben
Huvepharma
Follow
Monita Vereecken
Huvepharma
Follow
Robert Serwata
Follow
Koen De Gussem
Huvepharma
Follow
Show more
Join to be able to comment.
Once you join Engormix, you will be able to participate in all content and forums.
* Required information
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Create a post
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.
LoginRegister