Disease Prevention Using Elisa Technique

Published on: 5/27/2015
Author/s : Dr.Prasad P Kulkarni (Polchem)

Even vulnerability of market conditions cannot stop the growth of Indian Poultry Industry today. Continuous improvement in genetic potential targeted towards getting better performance from the bird has made this unbelievable success realistic today. Along with the genetic upgradetation, the success can also be credited to nutritional awareness amongst the producers. It however fails to address the crucial issue of conferring adequate immunity to the bird against a battery of bacterial, viral pathogens. Infection pressure in any poultry cluster builds up continuously despite of effective biosecurity measures and innovative vaccination regimes. Modern poultry industry is persistently under threat of several clinical and sub-clinical infection, vaccination failure and combination of infection. Currently, encountered outbreak situations amongst poultry often found to be of multiple infection cases. Such outbreaks essentially require differential diagnosis. The microbiological, pathological and immunological support becomes indispensible during mixed infections.

Even if apparently disease scenario looks complicated in today’s condition, strategic implementation of simple guidelines if followed can help to overcome this situation if followed meticulously. Following three steps guideline may be followed to tackle complex situation of multiple infection.

a) Correct diagnosis/confirmation of disease

b) Mapping immune status of bird

c) Surveillance of disease causing agent in respective area &its prevention

The infective agents vary from area to area and create the difficulty by the way of showing subclinical or hidden presence. Clear idea of clinical and subclinical infections at the site of operations is essential while attempting to re-organise the immunizationof the birds to control the infections. Otherwise lingering infections can take away the profits of this business which itself becoming thin day to day. What we must achieve is the bird competent bird to sustain growth pressure by nullifying disease stress through proper disease control programme by technique of “immunoprofiling” the poultry flocks regularly. The easiest way to do achieve this is by planning protective schedule based on results of flock screening. Reading disease challenge correctly especially sub-clinical manifestations by proper screening of birds periodically we can identify the pathogens and plan the preventive schedule. The technique should map the prevailing pathogenic load in an area with relative immune status of birds which gives line of action for better disease resistance and to achieve optimum performance.This is also called seraprofiling, disease profiling or monitoringof the flock. Immunoprofiling of the flocks can be helpful for:

  • Diagnosing vertically transmitted diseases
  • Designing protection/vaccination schedule.
  • Detecting sub-clinical infections, immunosuppression.
  • Measuring vaccine efficacy.
  • Reading maternal antibody status to plan vaccination.

In early days tis monitoring of infection to the birds was done using the antigen on plate agglutination like tests to identify the infected stock. Nowadays, on larger size of flock’s dose not only makes it difficult but impossible to test for each disease. Further after invention of sampling techniques tests like Heamagglutination and heanaggulitation inhibition were found reliable for confirmation of diseases like Newcastle and Infectious Bronchitis. But since every virus doesn’t have this property this test was for limited for only few diseases and was not reliable to judge the vaccine response.The traditionally followed HA/HI as good role in disease confirmation were found low precision because of dependency on technician especially for result reading. It also was lacking in precision control on laboratory protocol which is even prevailing even today. Still it was widely used looking at cost convenience. This limitation of other tests to screen bird at the same time for all the diseases together actually developed the wet lab technique called Elisa. Even if the development was gradual, the reproducibility of results compare to old techniques was improved using ELISA. Even lack of standard guidelines was overwhelmed by some of the efficient Elisa plate producers after years of efforts together developing “Baseline” for judging vaccine response, disease confirmation and to plan the immunization. At the same time, when few novel and high precision methods like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) also available were demanding heavy investment, technology and skilled manpower and becoming difficult to establish for common farmers. Considering these two extremes ELISA can be thought as golden mean due to the moderate cost and accuracy.

ELISA been considered as the best amongst presently available diagnostic tool andcan easily understood one by one as classified further:

  • Development of Elisa
  • Advantages of Elisa
  • Sampling technique for Elisa
  • Lab processing of samples for Elisa
  • Interpretation from the Elisa report

1) Development of Elisa 

This novel technique is well accepted worldwide today, but had to overcame many hurdles in with help of technology development. The Initial limitations thought course of technology advancements and modern manufacturing techniques were successfully overcame in and today worldwide it is admired not only for disease confirmation but for planning the preventive schedule too.This process of developenent can be summarise in three major achievements

a) This wet lab technique of Elisa overcame Poor Assay Specificitywhich was biggest challenge in earlier days. Because of purity of antigen was difficult in olden days and culture of antigen was on solid phase this issue made coating of antigen difficult uniformly. With modern techniques of high precision in filtration and cultivation of antigen is not only pure but more reliable and uniform. The antigen is cultured today and coated on surface very successful mainly due to art of manufacturing process which is absolutely without any human interference entirely machine operated uniform. The advancement in infrastructure for storage and transport facilities also helped today Elisa to become more user friendly.

b) The ambiguity in the Elisa in early days showing Low Assay Sensitivity was mainly related to complexity of reagents, its stability, and storage as well as transport facilities. In technology driven era today it has become achievable task. The subsequent development took long time for better alternatives to make reagents easily differentiable, stable and long life since involved lot of research and development. The universal and user friendly protocol was been established thereafter. Today all reagents like Conjugate, Substrate and stop solution were made on ready to use base. This largely contributes to widespread of this technique worldwide.The reagents alkaline phosphatase in conjugate instead of horse radish peroxidase improved the sensitivity of conjugate to large extent. p-Nitrophenyl Phosphate(PNPP) in substrate improves more linear reactionthan tetra methylene blue which four improves accuracy of substrate to large extent. The provision of preparing ready to use substrate in lab immediately the colour development of this procedure more perfectly correlating to the antigen antibody reaction so as to reach correct optical densities and to give perfect sera picture of the bird. Even the wash buffer development was so miraculous which assures removal of the non- specific proteins attached to antigen while washing the plate during the protocol. The reagents “Reference Control “which itself defines validity of procedure and is an extraordinary result of human analogy application. All ready to use solutions with moderately trained person make this technique easy to perform and well acceptable at technician level.

c) Analytical Help - The report interpretation of ELISA still an art. But the baseline data availability with standard manufacturers today makes the Elisa immediately acceptable for good clinicians. The software today can help to generate the own baseline fromsite to site if needful. The parameters like vaccination Index makes analysis of results more clear and diagnosis more perfect in order to provide the guidelines for further action.

These updates makes Elisa the most handy tool which gives perfect guidelines for disease prevention and diagnosis help to the poultry producer in short span.

2) Advantages of Elisa

In a very short span of time this wet lab technique became acceptable on technician and analytical level. The main advantages behind the acceptance were:

  • Moderate setup cost.
  • Easy for operating.
  • Good precision & reliability and reproducibility.
  • Highly sensitive and dependable.
  • Baseline Guidelines and Vaccination Index parameter which can differentiate vaccinal and infective titres.
  • Software help for data keeping and analysis in required format to compare to correlate with flock performance.

3) Sampling Technique for Elisa

In Elisa blood, serum or sometimes from egg yolk extract is used as sample for screening presence of antigen in the bird. The whole process scales the “Antibody” called protein in blood/serum of the bird. The infective agent (virus/Bacteria) when enters the body system responds immunologically producing antibody called proteins by the bird. This degree of response is depends on situation like vaccination, infection or take reaction. This response is quantified using blood or sera as samples form the bird. This wet lab procedure is termed “ELISA”. Elisa is a quantitative test which measures antibodies in serum using optical density reader because of which the accuracy of results is improved to very reliable level avoiding the errors at technician level from all possible angles. The software helps to convert these optical density readings using sample to positive ration to give the “titre” status present in the bird. Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay is within three hours discloses the “seropicture”of the flock which can be easily correlated with flock condition accordingly. Baseline provided by kit manufacturers help in deciding the further course of action depending on type of bird age and immunization done before collecting the sample. The technique requires Antigen coated surface plates, reagents like serum diluent, conjugate, substrate, the stop solution along with wash buffer. For example at said age group if antibody levels are lower you can prefer the booster for vaccination. The consulting veterinarian can be a best guide for further course of action. The common guidelines cannot be drawn as the place, age and immunization programme varies in most of the cases. But the technique is becoming so reliable that with good analytical skills. Application of parameters like “Vaccination Index” can help you differentiating vaccinal and infective titres which is unique of its kind found nowhere in any other diagnostic methods. 

Figure 1: Principle of Elisa application

The space sufficient for personal computer is good enough to accommodate the whole assembly for Elisa in the lab. The technique comes with defined protocol so makes technician adoptable in short time. Today not only this but the test come with tools like “Reference control” which certifies the validity of test making it most reliable helping to eliminate procedural errors while interpreting the report. The entire process of sampling and its operative part can be summarised in two segments

a) Sampling procedure&

b) Sample transport

a) Sampling Procedure

As the test is carried out on blood/serum of the bird the first important operation is clean serum collection. To carry out Elisa normally blood collection is done by Wing Vein or by direct heart collection (at chick stage) method in poultry. 

Figure 2: selection of random samples for blood collection of birds in a poultry shed

Plan the random sampling from shed covering all the areas in shed as shown in the diagram. Tis can be followed in cage or even deep litter rearing. Birds from all part of shed for sampling must be selected. Approximately 1 to 1.5 ml of blood from each bird is sufficient to carry out Elisa. For the flock size up to 10,000 birds, 20-23 random samples need to be collected for correct representation of entire flock carefully as shown in figure 2. If the flock size is large, then collect more samples accordingly for which the suggestible thumb rule of taking 2% birds can be followed. Each shed is treated as one flock and combine 20-23 samples including male birds in breeder can be ideal to represent the sera-picture of the flock. The total 18 female and 5 male is always better ratio for sampling.The sampling depending on specific need can also be done entirely for flock sometimes. In specific cases like Reo virus infection sampling of ailing birds is also suggested for confirmation. For valuable stocks like grandparents all birds individually are screened for diseases like Avian Leucosis Complex. 

Figure 3: Blood collection in Chicks (direct heart) and in adult bird (wing vein)

 

The important points to be considered during blood collection are

a) Minimum 20 samples from flock are good enough to produce true sera-picture of the flock. Birds in one shed must be treated as one flock.

b) 2 ml sized disposable syringes with 22 gauge needle is ideal for blood collection of birds. More narrow needles may lead to hemolysis due to suction pressure.

c) it is better to change syringe after each collection but if needed can be managed by washing the syringe before next collection assuring syringe wash 2- 3 times with sterile saline after every bird is bled. Use 45 degree of angle while pouring syringe blood to collection tube in gentle manner to avoid hemolysis.

d) Coagulation of RBC’s normally within one hour of time is achieved. Sometimes this time lap increases for clotting if blood collection is done immediately after feeding of the flock which do not has any scientific explanation.

e) When the blood is transferred from syringe to a tube, keep the tube in inclined position of 45 degree angle for better serum separation and faster blood clotting.

f) When the serum is separated, take out only the serum in micro centrifuge tube and no clot or red blood cells should intermix.

g) Pale yellow to yellow colored serum samples can be preserved at 0°C for long time without denaturation of proteins. Never keep clotted blood samples at 0°C or below because it get haemolysed and red haemolysed serum is result after thaughing 

Figure 4: Proper coagulated blood sample

b) Sample transport

It must be mandatory for proper serum transport that below mentioned points must be taken care without fail otherwise there are many chances of spoiling the collected samples:

  • The properly collected blood samples can only be sent by cold chain. It is always safe to send serum samples only separating blood clots.
  • Like live vaccine it has to be packed in insulated thermocol boxes and has to be tightly packed using cooling pads to maintain cooling.
  • It should travel in cool temperature range of 4 to 8 degrees. Precaution has to be taken for fast and safe transportation.

In field conditions where cold-chain transport system is difficult for the serum transport filter paper method can be applied which also give accurate results. Separate dilution protocol is also been defined for the same.

Transport on filter paper: 

Figure 5: Micropipette and filter paper for easy transport

  • Two micro-liter of each serum sample is to be placed on the respective disc cutout of the strip as shown in picture using good precision pipette.
  • Tightly attach the tip on the micropipette before placing the serum on filter paper disc please ensure that outside portion of the tip does not have any serum sticking to it.
  • Use fresh tip for each sample.
  • Repeat the same procedure for all the samples by placing them in a row.
  • Let the strip air dry. Write down all the necessary flock details alongside the rows of spots with the help of a lead pencil.
  • Place the strip securely in a polythene bag and keep it in an envelope and courier the envelope wherever required. 

4) Lab processing of samples for Elisa

It is recommended that the whole Elisa procedure must be done at room temperature in between 22 to 27 degree centigrade. This is to avoid effect of temperature on antigen antibody reaction and also interference of non-specific proteins during the reaction. The technician preferably be a trainedone. Since the plate is antigen coated it must be stored in the temperature range of 4 to 8 degree of in refrigerator carefully. Keep technicians available in a rotation work plan so as to train all team and handle the absence of any one.The kit is with defined protocol along with for the procedural details. A single kit carries antigen coated plates sufficient to test 480 samples that mean 25 flocks. The actual processing of reagents with their application are summarised as below (Lab protocol of Elisa)-

  • All the reagents and serum must be room temperature while performing Elisa. The antigen coated plate is used in which the serum is poured for creating antigen antibody adhesion. If the antibodies are present in sample it will adhere to antigen coated on plate. For quantifying the same rest of process is followed
     
  • The incubated plate after antigen antibody reaction and subsequent washing is further processed with conjugate solution which contains the anti-chicken antibodies clubbed together with oxidizing enzyme. This is for the purpose of giving colour tomeasure the degree of reactionquantitatively. Here the antigen antibody complex formed in first step attracts to anti-chicken antibodies in conjugate. The degree of reaction is directly proportional to antibodies present in the serum sample.
     
  • The conjugate processed plate after the incubation and subsequent washing is subjected to substrate. The plate now contains antigenantibody complex attached to anti-chicken antibodies and oxidizing enzyme with it. This then exposes substrate solutionwhich due to oxidation (Enzyme used in earlier step) starts developing colour. This reaction after defined time exposure is controlled using stop solution.
     
  • The degree of colour development which is directly proportional antibodies present in serum is measured against light of defined nanometres wavelength by optical density of reader to avoid the manual error. The software provided reads the optical densities of all the samples.
     
  • The optical readerbased on readings of positive controls, negative controls provided along with sample readings calculates the sample positive ratio(S:P ratio). Based on this S to P ratio it takes the help of software to convert these OD readings to titre values.
     
  • The report can be obtained in desired format using software. It represents the graphical picture in which mean titres from the flock are shown along with individual sample titres and CV. Coefficient of variation represents variation as usual which can be good guideline for differentiating vaccine titres and natural infection of flock.
     
  • Standard companies provide the baseline data which gives range of titres generated after lot of study, number experiments. This is then compared with generated report. This comparison called analysis can give the result whether the flock is exposed to tested pathogen or not. With this even response to vaccination or pathogen can be concluded.
     
  • The reference control serum which is expected to arrive at predefined titre value. This is treated as sample during the kit processing and is reported separately to certify validity of procedure. This is exceptional tool developed by modern and technically expert kit producing companies to point out procedural error.
     
  • The vaccination Index called parameter helps in differentiating vaccine derived and infection responded titres and also gives guidelines on vaccination response. The baseline data generated is presented in results using the user friendly software offers lot of analytical work in readymade form, including automatic interpretation too.

5) Interpretation from Elisa report

It is always suggested to decide purpose of screening the flock by Elisa before you plan it. Sometimes it can be for diagnostic confirmation, sometimes for planning immunization and sometimes for reading the response. It is very skilful job to draw conclusion out of Elisa report even though expert veterinarians can make it easily. It is also important to correlate the current Elisa report with current flock status, vaccination of bird and clinical conditions.

The report mainly gives titre values of flock, birds individually and coefficient of variation along with. Depending on the type of bird, stage and age a good clinician can easily draw conclusion out of it. This simply needs the comparison of report with the defined baseline. It is as good as reading haematology report of a human being comparing with normal standard values. The good and reputed kit producing companies also provide the provision of automatic interpretation in their software.

Conclusion 

The growth of poultry seems unstoppable in-spite of all the odds. The inevitable problems with the growth pressure with genetic upgradetation of bird along with expansion of poultry industry mainly contribute spread of disease agents. The complexities of farming are growing along with population due to feed prices, lack of manpower, dense population and mixed farming. In order to Control this issue the perfect monitoring is needed which can give guidelines for disease control plan. Amongst all the available diagnostic techniques ELISA stands as a golden mean for the diagnostic and control guidelines because:

  • Moderate cost.
  • Easy to operate and reliable methodology.
  • Biocheak’s interpretation guidelines for report analysis.
  • Quick- the test takes not more than 2 to 3 hrs. 
  • Same protocol for multiple antigens.
  • Computer controlled so more reliable and less possibility of human error for result the company BIOCHEK has developed an advance concept of reference control serum which is a standardized serum with measured antibody concentration. This helps greatly to determine accuracy of Elisa procedure and makes easy to confirm validity of the test.
  • Reproducible – It has been proven with number of experiments that it gives good reproducible and accurate results.
  • Sensitive- Can detect antigen at very low concentration as early as 10 days after vaccination or challenge.

This technique of ELISA is a prove tool today which provides help in disease confirmation and in guidelines for solving the disease problems anywhere.

 
remove_red_eye 1084 forum 27 bar_chart Statistics share print
Share :
close
See all comments
 
   | 
Copyright © 1999-2021 Engormix - All Rights Reserved