Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Feed Samples from Asia

Published: April 9, 2007
By: Limien Tan (Romer Labs Singapore Pte.) IBiomin Mycotoxin Survey Program

Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Feed Samples from Asia - Image 1


The last report on the occurrence of mycotoxin was published in 2006 (1), generated immense interest among the feed industry.

In the current analysis, the occurrence of various mycotoxins in feed samples was found to be: aflatoxin total; 16%, deoxynivalenol; 48%, fumonisin B1; 46%, ochratoxin A; 24% and zearalenone; 38%. The general outlook was similar to that reported early on as depicted in Chart 1.


The data

This report is based on about 800 samples analyzed over a 12-month period from October 2005 to September 2006 for the major mycotoxins of interest; namely, aflatoxins total, zearalenone (ZON), deoxynivalenol (DON), fumonisin B1 (Fum), T-2 toxin and ochratoxin A (OTA). The samples received were primarily from Asia. Again, the data were analyzed from two perspectives; first by geographical regions where the samples were originally from, and second by means of commodity types. The geographical regions are grouped as follows; North Asia (China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan), South-East Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam), South Asia (primarily India) and Oceania (primarily Australia). The sample types are classified as feed ingredients (such as corn, soybean meal, wheat, rice, DDGS, etc.) and finished feed samples.


The Results

For the purpose of data analysis, non-detect levels are based on the detection limits of the test method for each toxin; Aflatoxins total < 4 µg/kg; Zearalenone < 32 µg/kg; Deoxynivalenol < 50 µg/kg; Fumonisin B1 < 100 µg/kg; T-2 Toxin < 125 µg/kg and Ochratoxin A < 2 µg/kg. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) methodology was used for the analysis of all mycotoxin except T-2 Toxin which was performed using Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC).


Chart 1: Occurrence of Mycotoxin in all feed samples monitored from (a) Oct 2003 to Sep 2005 and (b) Oct 2005 to Sep 2006

(a) Period from Oct 2003 to Sep 2005(b) Period from Oct 2005 to Sep 2006
Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Feed Samples from Asia - Image 2


The occurrence and concentration of mycotoxin in all feed samples analyzed according to the geographical regions are depicted in Tables 1A - D below.


Table 1A. North Asia (includes China, Japan, Taiwan and Korea)

North Asia

Aflatoxin

ZON

DON

FUM

T2

OTA

No. of Tests

414

414

414

324

387

111

No. Positive

23

228

310

188

3

31

Percent Positive (%)

6%

55%

75%

58%

1%

28%

Median (µg/kg)

<4

46

234

158

<125

<2

Average (µg/kg)

51

592

731

1,579

299

15

Maximum (µg/kg)

494

14,105

10,374

14,714

399

82



Table 1B. South East Asia (includes Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam)

South East Asia

Aflatoxin

ZON

DON

FUM

T2

OTA

No. of Tests

220

222

220

203

205

34

No. Positive

88

51

42

92

0

3

Percent Positive (%)

40%

23%

19%

45%

0

9%

Median (µg/kg)

<4

<32

<50

<100

<125

<2

Average (µg/kg)

37

164

661

683

ND

5

Maximum (µg/kg)

306

762

3,908

2,038

ND

8



Table 1C. South Asia (mainly India)

South Asia

Aflatoxin

ZON

DON

FUM

T2

OTA

No. of Tests

31

31

31

28

27

7

No. Positive

17

6

1

8

0

4

Percent Positive (%)

55%

19%

3%

29%

0

57%

Median (µg/kg)

15

<32

<50

<100

<125

2

Average (µg/kg)

39

305

57

202

ND

4

Maximum (µg/kg)

139

1,182

57

334

ND

10



Table 1D. Oceania (mainly Australia)

Oceania

Aflatoxin

ZON

DON

FUM

T2

OTA

No. of Tests

62

62

62

62

29

2

No. Positive

2

9

10

5

0

0

Percent Positive (%)

3%

15%

16%

8%

0

0

Median (µg/kg)

<4

<32

<50

<100

<125

<2

Average (µg/kg)

4

211

224

218

ND

ND

Maximum (µg/kg)

4

758

494

305

ND

ND



Chart 2. Prevalence of Mycotoxin in different geographical regions within Asia-Pacific.


Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Feed Samples from Asia - Image 3



North Asia:

Occurrence of mycotoxins in samples received from North Asia was 6%, 55% 75% 58% and 28% for aflatoxins, zearalenone, deoxynivalenol, fumonisin B1 and ochratoxin A respectively. T2- toxin was found in less than 1% of the total sample population. For aflatoxin, the highest level detected was 494 ppb in a corn sample from China. DON was prevalent in this region (75%) and the highest level detected was in a DDGS sample from China with 10,374 µg/kg. ZON and Fum, on the other hand, were found in 55% and 58% of the samples respectively. Highest level of ZON found was 14,105 µg/kg in a corn gluten meal sample from China. For fumonisin B1, it was 14,714 µg/kg in a corn sample also from China. Ochratoxin A was detected in 28% of the samples; 82 µg/kg in a soybean meal sample from China was the maximum level analyzed.


South-East Asia:

The prevalence of mycotoxin contamination in South-East Asia is in the order as follows; fumonisin (45%), aflatoxin (40%), zearalenone (23%), deoxynivalenol (19%) and ochratoxin (9%).T-2 toxin was not detected in the current analysis.


South Asia:

Although the number of samples analyzed from this region was comparatively smaller (total 31), prevalence of aflatoxin (55%) was evident. Occurrence of ZON and Fum were observed at 19% and 29% respectively. OTA though was found in 57% of the samples, the levels detected were not high (maximum of 10 µg/kg). DON was found in less than 1% of the samples and T-2 toxin was not detected in any of the samples analyzed.


Oceania:

More than half of the samples analyzed were straws/hay. The prevalence of mycotoxins from this region was DON (16%), ZON (15%), Fum (8%) and aflatoxins (3%). OTA and T-2 toxin were not detected in these samples.

Tables 2A – 2I below are intended to show the occurrence of the various mycotoxins in the feed samples according to the commodity type.


Table 2A: Corn


Corn

Aflatoxin

ZON

DON

FUM

T2

OTA

No. of Tests

177

177

177

173

167

51

No. Positive

36

83

128

140

0

9

Percent Positive (%)

20%

47%

72%

81%

0

18%

Median (µg/kg)

<4

<32

307

557

<125

<2

Average (µg/kg)

72

404

862

1,716

ND

11

Maximum (µg/kg)

494

3,510

5,270

14,714

ND

44



Table 2B: Soybean Meal


Soybean Meal

Aflatoxin

ZON

DON

FUM

T2

OTA

No. of Tests

80

80

80

79

77

20

No. Positive

1

21

8

6

1

6

Percent Positive (%)

1%

26%

10%

8

1%

30%

Median (µg/kg)

<4

<32

<50

<100

<125

<2

Average (µg/kg)

5

273

278

180

133

19

Maximum (µg/kg)

5

1,078

489

265

133

82



Table 2C: Wheat / bran

Wheat/bran

Aflatoxin

ZON

DON

FUM

T2

OTA

No. of Tests

42

42

42

39

42

14

No. Positive

0

11

33

0

0

8

Percent Positive (%)

0

26%

79%

0

0

57%

Median (µg/kg)

<4

<32

234

<100

<125

3

Average (µg/kg)

ND

223

505

ND

ND

8

Maximum (µg/kg)

ND

1,835

3,908

ND

ND

23



Table 2D: Corn Gluten Meal


Corn Gluten Meal

Aflatoxin

ZON

DON

FUM

T2

OTA

No. of Tests

19

19

19

18

19

1

No. Positive

3

17

6

9

0

0

Percent Positive (%)

16%

89%

32%

50%

0

0

Median (µg/kg)

<4

368

<50

81

<125

<2

Average (µg/kg)

37

2,082

1,890

2,285

ND

ND

Maximum (µg/kg)

82

14,105

10,259

12,027

ND

ND



Table 2E: Rice / bran


Rice/bran

Aflatoxin

ZON

DON

FUM

T2

OTA

No. of Tests

16

16

16

16

13

1

No. Positive

4

4

0

1

0

0

Percent Positive (%)

25%

25%

0

6%

0

0

Median (µg/kg)

<4

<32

<50

<100

<125

<2

Average (µg/kg)

19

50

ND

278

ND

ND

Maximum (µg/kg)

37

56

ND

278

ND

ND



Table 2F: DDGS

DDGS

Aflatoxin

ZON

DON

FUM

T2

OTA

No. of Tests

16

17

17

14

14

3

No. Positive

4

15

11

9

0

3

Percent Positive (%)

25%

88%

65%

64%

0

100%

Median (µg/kg)

<4

287

850

381

<125

41

Average (µg/kg)

27

1,260

3,075

1,718

ND

38

Maximum (µg/kg)

89

8,107

10,374

9,042

ND

68



Table 2G: Other Feed Ingredients (include Canola meal, Full fat Soy, Fish meal etc.)

Other Feed Ingredients

Aflatoxin

ZON

DON

FUM

T2

OTA

No. of Tests

71

71

71

71

67

14

No. Positive

12

16

20

6

0

0

Percent Positive (%)

17%

23%

28%

8%

0

0

Median (µg/kg)

<4

<32

<50

<100

<125

<2

Average (µg/kg)

52

243

831

743

ND

ND

Maximum (µg/kg)

133

823

2,690

1,930

ND

ND



Table 2H: Finished Feed

Finished Feed

Aflatoxin

ZON

DON

FUM

T2

OTA

No. of Tests

324

326

324

236

282

68

No. Positive

70

122

153

136

2

16

Percent Positive (%)

22%

37%

47%

58%

<1

24%

Median (µg/kg)

<4

<32

<50

149

<125

<2

Average (µg/kg)

23

369

389

702

266

9

Maximum (µg/kg)

139

5,214

3,003

4,909

399

59



Table 2I: Straw / Hay

Straw/Silage

Aflatoxin

ZON

DON

FUM

T2

OTA

No. of Tests

47

47

47

44

31

1

No. Positive

0

13

22

2

0

0

Percent Positive (%)

0

28%

47%

5%

0

0

Median (µg/kg)

<4

<32

<50

149

<125

<2

Average (µg/kg)

ND

170

352

301

ND

ND

Maximum (µg/kg)

ND

758

1,484

305

ND

ND



Chart 3. Prevalence of mycotoxins in different commodities


Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Feed Samples from Asia - Image 4



Corn:

About 180 corn samples were analyzed in the current report. Among the six major mycotoxins analyzed, except for T-2 toxin, the remaining 5 toxins were present in 20 to 81% of the corn samples. Aflatoxins were found in 20% (high of 494 µg/kg; average 72 µg/kg), ZON 47% (maximum of 3,510 µg/kg; average of 404 µg/kg), DON 72% (maximum of 5,270 µg/kg; average of 862 µg/kg), Fumonisin B1 81% (maximum of 14,714 µg/kg; average 1,716 µg/kg), and OTA 18% (maximum of 44 µg/kg; average 11 µg/kg).


Soybean Meal:

Of the 80 soybean meal samples analyzed, occurrence and concentration of mycotoxin contamination were relatively low except for ZON. Aflatoxins were found in 1% (only one sample was found at 5 µg/kg); ZON in 26% (maximum of 1,078 µg/kg; average of 273 µg/kg); DON in 10% (maximum of 489 µg/kg; average of 278 µg/kg), Fumonisin B1 8 % (maximum of 265 µg/kg; average of 180 µg/kg) and T-2 toxin 1% (only one out of 77 samples was contaminated at 133 µg/kg). For OTA, 30% were positive (maximum of 82 µg/kg; average 19 µg/kg).


Wheat/bran:

More than 40 wheat/bran samples were analyzed. No aflatoxins were found in all wheat/bran samples tested. DON accounted for 79% of the contamination (maximum of 3,908 µg/kg; average 505 µg/kg). ZON was found in 26% of the samples (maximum of 1,835 µg/kg; average 273 µg/kg). Eight out of 14 wheat/bran samples (57%) were positive (maximum of 23 µg/kg; average 8 µg/kg).


Corn Gluten Meal:

The corn gluten meal samples analyzed show widespread prevalence for ZON with 89% (maximum of 14,105 µg/kg; average of 2,082 µg/kg) and Fum with 50% (maximum of 12,027 µg/kg, average 2,285 µg/kg). DON accounted for 32% (maximum of 10,259 µg/kg; average 1,890 µg/kg) and aflatoxins 16% (maximum of 82 µg/kg, average 37 µg/kg). Both OTA and T-2 toxin were not detected in the corn gluten meal samples.


Distiller Dried Grain Soluble (DDGS):

The use of DDGS as feed ingredient is gaining popularity within the region. Like corn gluten meal samples, the prevalence of ZON, DON and FUM is evident. ZON accounted for 88% (high of 8,107 µg/kg; average 1,260 µg/kg); DON 65% (high of 10,374 µg/kg; average 3,075 µg/kg) and Fum 64% (high of 9,042 µg/kg; average 1,718 µg/kg). Aflatoxin was found in 25% of the samples (maximum 89 µg/kg; average 27 µg/kg). All 3 samples tested for OTA were positive (maximum 68 µg/kg; average 38 µg/kg). T-2 Toxin was not detected.


Rice:

25% were found to be contaminated with aflatoxins (maximum of 37 µg/kg; average 19 µg/kg). Though ZON was also found in 25% of the samples, the contamination level was relatively low (maximum 56 µg/kg; average 50 µg/kg). Only 6% were positive for Fum (only one sample detected at 278 µg/kg). DON, OTA and T-2 toxin were not detected.


Finished Feed:

Finished feed comprises mainly poultry and swine feed samples. The order of occurrence was found to be as follows: Fum 58% (maximum 4,909 µg/kg; average 702 µg/kg); DON 47 % (maximum 3,003 µg/kg; average 389 µg/kg); ZON 37% (maximum 5,214 µg/kg; average of 369 µg/kg); OTA 24% (maximum 59 µg/kg; average 9 µg/kg); aflatoxin 22% (maximum 139 µg/kg; average 23 µg/kg) and finally T-2 toxin accounted for less than 1% of contaminated samples (maximum 399 µg/kg; average of 266 µg/kg).


Straw/Hay:

More than 40 straw/hay samples were analyzed. Predominantly, DON and ZON were found at 47% (high of 1,484 µg/kg; average 352 µg/kg) and 28% (high of 758 µg/kg; 170 µg/kg) respectively. Only 5 % were positive for Fum (high and average of around 300 µg/kg). Aflatoxin and T-2 toxin were not detected.



Summary:

The occurrence and highest levels of mycotoxins detected based on commodity type and country of origin is summarized in the table below:

Mycotoxin

Sample Size

Percent Positive

Average of Positive (µg/kg)

Highest Level Detected (µg/kg)

Commodity found

Country of Origin

AflatoxinsTotal

792

16%

39

494

Corn

China

Zearalenone

795

38%

487

14,105

Corn Gluten Meal

China

Deoxynivalenol

792

48%

681

10,374

DDGS

China

Fumonisin B1

678

46%

1,224

14,714

Corn

China

T-2 toxin

711

<1%

299

399

Finished Feed

China

Ochratoxin A

172

24%

13

82

Soybean Meal

China



Interestingly, from the cumulative data we have seen, there were certain degree of association between some mycotoxins and specific commodity types. For instance, in corn, 81% were found to be contaminated with Fum B1; for wheat/bran, DON was found in 79% of the samples; for corn gluten meal and DDGS, ZON accounted for more than 88% of the contamination.

Nevertheless, the data presented are intended for information purposes only. For detailed profile of mycotoxin contamination in various commodities, it is advisable to carry out the necessary analyses. Such valuable information shall then be incorporated into the total quality management system for the betterment of animal health.


Outlook:

Special interest in the new study will be new raw materials such as DDGS, Cassava and the like. The budget for this study is about 250 000 USD. For more information please contact Kurt Wegleitner (Marketing Director), Biomin Laboratory Singapore Pte Ltd.


Footnote:

As an indication on the cost of such survey conducted by Biomin Laboratory Singapore Pte Ltd, the charges are based on each toxin per sample. The analytical fees range from US$ 70 – 95 per toxin per sample depending on the toxin requested.


Reference:

(1) LJ Chin and LM Tan, 2006. Occurrence of mycotoxins in Asian feed samples. Asian Poultry (May 2006) and Asian Pork (June 2006).

Related topics
Join to be able to comment.
Once you join Engormix, you will be able to participate in all content and forums.
* Required information
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Create a post
Dr.Iftikhar Ahmad Mashhadi
29 de agosto de 2008
A good survey by Mr. Tan on the occurence of mycotoxin in feed and raw materials which is a burning problem all over the world but the study depicts the qualitative % picture of +Ve and -ve. It is the need to investigate the tolerable limits of individual mycotoxin for different poultry classes. When we analyse the mycotoxin either on TLC, HPLC or ELISA, the toxin levels crosses the FDA approved levels but at the same time the birds are attaining weight and best FCR. Keeping in view the said survey there is a need to develop a quick and economical method of mycotoxin analysis on the spot rather than the expensive Kit Methods. Overall it is a best approach exposing the current status of mycotoxin presence in the raw materials being offered to our animals and birds. I appreciate Mr. Tan for this achievement.
Carl Lee
Carl Lee
10 de julio de 2008
Good presentation. I concern more about the cost of detection the toxins. It is too expensive in field about $70 per single sample. If only we low the cost, the harm brought by mycotoxins may be effectively decreased. Quicking Biotech Carl Lee
Dr. Karki Kedar
12 de mayo de 2008
To solve the mycoses, mycotoxicosis by storage fungus it is now high time to practice the top dressing with toxin binder to prepared feed or use of liquid toxinbinder may minimize the casualty. Dr. Kedar Karki
Reader
Reader
9 de abril de 2008
Good survey, but what happen now that we know this? What are the solutions? Are there products in the market that can help my animals fight these mycotoxins?
DR SUSHANTTH  RAI, BELLIPADY
8 de junio de 2007
Mr Kurt, Good presentation. Dr Sushanth Rai Raisons Breeders Karnataka - India
Kurt Wegleitner
Kurt Wegleitner
6 de junio de 2007
Well - the study reveals min, max and average values. I think this is as detailed as you can go in a summary of 800 samples. If you need more details, one would have to look into the raw data. Why don't you get in touch with Biomin in the Philippines? I am sure they can help you with more data.
Lina Policarpio
Lina Policarpio
5 de junio de 2007
This study will be more helpful if the reporting of results is not just % positive and negative but rather quantitative.
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.
LoginRegister