Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

Aflatoxin toxicity reduction in broiler diets

T5X SD feed additives efficiency on the aflatoxin toxicity reduction in broiler diets – In Vivo Study

Published: October 20, 2011
By: SM Putrino (Evialis do Brasil), Danièle MARZIN (Neovia), G Benzoni, A Guyonvarch (In Vivo NSA)
Summary

Aflatoxin contamination of grains is a widespread problem in many regions of the world. Aflatoxins have a major negative impact on poultry production. Some feed additives have the ability to bind aflatoxins thus preventing bird toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo efficiency of the feed additive T5X SD in broilers fed aflatoxin B1-contaminated feeds. The experiment was performed during 21 days, using Cobb broiler chicks divided into five treatment groups: non-cantaminated controls; non-contaminated feed + 0.5% T5X SD; 2.8 ppm aflatoxin B1; 2.8 ppm aflatoxin B1 + 0.25% T5X SD; 2.8 ppm aflatoxin B1 + 0.5% T5X SD. Feed intake, body weight, feed conversion rate, liver:body weight ratio, and total plasma protein levels were recorded. The inclusion of 2.8 ppm aflatoxin B1 in the diet significantly affected broiler performance and physiological parameters (-24.4% in final body weight, -34.3% in plasma protein). The addition of 0.5% T5X SD to the contaminated feed resulted in normal body weight, feed intake, total plasma protein and liver:body weight ratio values, with no statistically-significant differences with the non-contaminated controls. The additive was effective in reducing the negative effects of mycotoxin B1 on broiler performance.


Key Words: Toxin-binder feed additive, Aflatoxin, Broilers, Performance.

Introduction
Mycotoxins are substances produced by molds, that have a toxic effect on animals, decreasing their performance and even causing death. Molds are broadly distributed throughout the world, also contaminating feed grains.
In order to reduce the negative effects of mycotoxins on animals, mycotoxin-adsorbing feed additives are used. Such products have different neutralization abilities. The purpose of this study was to determine the in vivo mycotoxin adsorption capacity of T5X SD in broilers.
Materials and Methods
The study was performed in Instituto Samitec, RS, Brazil.
Three hundred (300) Cobb, male, one-day-old broiler chicks were housed cages, in an environmentally-controlled room. Cages were arranged in 4-story batteries. Each cage was divided in two sections with individual feeders and drinkers.
The following parameters were evaluated:
a)      Weekly:
* Individual bird weight
* Feed intake
b)      At 21 days:
* Feed conversion rate
* Liver:body weight ratio
* Total plasma proteins: 12 blood samples per treatment
A completely-at-random experimental design including 5 treatments and 6 10-bird repetitions was used. The statistical analysis was performed using the Statgraphics Centurion XV software (version 15.1). The means were compared using Bonferroni´s test (P≤0.05).
Feed and water (iso-nutrient ration) were given ad libitum throughout the experimental period (21 days).
Table 1. Inclusion levels of both aflatoxin and T5X SD adsorbent in the feed
Treatment
No. of Birds
Aflatoxin (ppm)
T5X SD (%)
01
60
-
-
02
60
-
0.50
03
60
2.8
-
04
60
2.8
0.25
05
60
2.8
0.50
The aflatoxins used in the study included: B1 - 93.80%; B2 - 2.10%; G1 - 3.40%; G2 - 0.70%.
Results and Discussion
Mean body weight at experiment start was 47.7 g, with no statistical differences among treatment groups (see Table 2).
From week 2 on negative effects of mycotoxin on feed intake (Table 2) and body weight (Table 3) were seen. By experimental day 21 feed intake in the only aflatoxin -fed group was lower than that in groups fed the aflatoxin + additive rations.
Table 2. Mean feed intake (g/bird) in the aflatoxin-fed broilers, with or without the addition of the T5X SD anti-mycotoxin additive, during 21 days
Time Period
P
Treatment groups
Controls
0.5% T5X SD
2.8 ppm  Aflatoxin
Afla + 0.25% T5X SD
Afla + 0.5% T5X SD
Mean
CV¹
Mean
CV¹
Mean
CV¹
Mean
CV¹
Mean
CV¹
1 a 7 d
0.08
144.91 a
7
155.74 a
6
144.32 a
3
148.88 a
4
151.40 a
5
1 a 14 d
0.00
490.02 ab
5
521.01 a
3
418.27 c
9
445.13 bc
5
481.68 ab
7
1 a 21 d
0.00
1040.03 a
5
1035.28 a
3
840.46 c
3
928.90 b
5
1009.32 a
5
a - c Means in a line followed by different letters are statistically different by Bonferroni´s test (P≤0.05).
¹CV= Coefficient of variation (%).
Table 3. Mean body weight (g) of aflatoxin-fed broilers with or without the addition of the T5X SD anti-mycotoxin additive, during 21 days
Time period
P
Treatment groups
Controls
0.5% T5X SD
2.8 ppm  Aflatoxin
Afla + 0.25% T5X SD
Afla + 0.5% T5X SD
Mean
CV¹
Mean
CV¹
Mean
CV¹
Mean
CV¹
Mean
CV¹
Start
0.94
47.86 a
7
47.87 a
8
47.56 a
7
47.44 a
6
47.58 a
7
1 a 7 d
0.03
161.18 b
14
171.43 a
10
161.42 b
10
166.12 ab
12
165.42 ab
12
1 a 14 d
0.00
400.15 ab
18
418.40 a
13
320.58 d
17
354.68 c
16
381.69 bc
19
1 a 21 d
0.00
707.52 a
16
696.85 a
12
535.18 c
20
620.92 b
18
673.39 ab
19
a - d Means in a line followed by different letters are statistically different by Bonferroni´s test (P≤0.05).
¹CV= Coefficient of variation (%).
The body weight of birds fed the aflatoxin plus the T5X SD additive was higher than that of birds fed only the aflatoxin (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Mean body weight (g) of broilers fed aflatoxins, with or without the T5X SD anti-mycotoxin additive, during 21 days
T5X SD feed additives efficiency on the aflatoxin toxicity reduction in broiler diets – In Vivo Study - Image 1
The addition of 2.8 ppm aflatoxin resulted in decreased body weight (-24.4%) and feed intake (-19.2%).
The inclusion of 0.5% T5X SD in the ration contaminated with 2.8 ppm aflatoxin resulted in increased body weight (+25.8%) and feed intake (+20.1%).
Feed conversion rate, liver:body weight ratio, and total plasma protein results are shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Feed conversion rate (FCR), mean liver:body weight ratio (g/100 g) and total plasma protein levels (TPP; g/dL) in broilers fed aflatoxin with or without the T5X SD anti-mycotoxin additive, during 21 days.
 Time Period
P
Treatment groups
Controls
0.5% T5X SD
2.8 ppm  Aflatoxin
Afla + 0.25% T5X SD
Afla + 0.5% T5X SD
Mean
CV¹
Mean
CV¹
Mean
CV¹
Mean
CV¹
Mean
CV¹
FCR
0.15
1.47 a
7
1.49 a
2
1.58 a
7
1.50 a
3
1.50 a
3
Liver
0.00
3.32 c
23
3.12 c
13
4.86 a
17
4.74 a
22
4.02 b
24
TPP
<0.01
3.15 a
12
2.72 ab
18
2.07 b
31
2.24 b
38
2.99 a
20
FCR showed no difference among treatments.
The liver:body weight ratio was higher in the birds fed the aflatoxin with or without the anti-mycotoxin additive, than in the controls. The inclusion of 0.5% of T5X SD resulted in reduced liver:body weight ratio as compared with the other treatments that caused mycotoxin toxicity. Total plasma protein levels were reduced as a result of the presence of aflatoxin in the feed, with the exception of birds in the group fed the aflatoxin plus 0.5% T5X SD, which showed total plasma protein levels similar to those in the controls.
The addition of 2.8 ppm aflatoxin resulted in increased liver:body weight ratio (+46.4%), and decreased total plasma protein levels (-34.3%).
The inclusion of 0.5% T5X SD in the feed contaminated with 2.8 ppm aflatoxin resulted in decreased liver:body weight ratio (-17.3%) and increased total plasma protein levels (+44.4%).
Conclusion
The inclusion of 0.5% of the T5X SD anti-mycotoxin additive to a feed containing 2.8 ppm  aflatoxin was effective in decreasing the negative effects of aflatoxin on broiler performance.
Acknowledgements
Gratitude is expressed to Instituto Samitec (Santa Maria, RS, Brazil) for the execution of this study.
 This paper was originally presented in Portuguese at the XXII Latin American Poultry Congress in Buenos Aires, Argentina in August, 2011. It´s been translated with the purpose of sharing the results with English speakers.
Related topics
Authors:
Danièle Marzin
Olmix
Follow
Join to be able to comment.
Once you join Engormix, you will be able to participate in all content and forums.
* Required information
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Create a post
Christopher Hettiarachchi
Maxies
3 de mayo de 2012

Dear Daniele Marzin

First of all let me congratulate you for posting a well designed and well written research work and this is a good example for young researchers to follow.
I quite agree with Mr. M.Ruth that the author could have given some information on the active ingredients of the the product, T5XSD. Is there any particular reason why you have chosen aflatoxin concentration of 2.8ppm?

D.C.Hettiarachchi - Sri Lanka

Munir Ahmad Butt M/s BinSadiq International
SB Feed
3 de mayo de 2012
it is good product. If we consider cost benefit ratio of only one parameter, the FCR, farmer will get a huge profit only with this, and it is the same, 1.50 in both groups, i.e. Alfa + 0.25% T5X SD and Alfa + 0.5% T5X SD So we can use T5X SD with inclusion of 0.25% only, which will decrease its cost more as compared to other competitor products.
Nitin  Suryavanshi
3 de mayo de 2012

the article has basic status compared to other mycotoxin controll products available,which has the same efficacy and result.
what i suggest is that wheat bran , raw chicory root can be incorporated in the feed that serve the principles of nutrition and mycotoxin control which is cheaper and available ,then using such branded products

Tarek A.hady
2 de mayo de 2012

Dear Sir,
we invite you to join the official group of the animal wealth conference https://www.facebook.com/groups/animalconf/

Maheswar Rath
2 de mayo de 2012

dear author, it is nice to see your presentation of article for control/ reduction of aflatoxin toxicity . You have set the level as 2.8ppm and use of T5XSD 0.5% in the diet for better result. My doubt is if farmer has to use the product how much the farmer will add in the feed T5XSD per ton of feed it is 5kg beside other feed additives as usual. So considering the volume per ton of feed it is desirable to enlighten what it contain and how far the product can justify encroaching other nutrient's space in a broiler feed formula . some clarification is needed on the product. why i will use this product ? Is it competitive than other products available and economical?

m rath

Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.
LoginRegister