Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

Influenza: FAO monitors pigs, poultry and waterfowl in hot spots

Published: April 19, 2012
Source : FAO
Disease surveillance is supported by USAID's Emerging Pandemic Threats programme
FAO recently launched projects in four Asian countries to step up defenses against influenza by moving beyond a focus on domestic poultry to instead address a range of threats posed by the ever closer mingling of humans, wild animals and, especially, livestock animals, and the potentially devastating influenza viruses they share.
On 23-24 February, FAO animal health experts from Bangladesh, China, Thailand and Viet Nam met with counterparts from national governments and research institutes, regional representatives from the World Organisation for Animal Health, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the World Health Organization, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, France's International Research Center for Agricultural Development (CIRAD) and renowned universities and NGOs to hammer out the final details in the projects' work plans over the next year. The inception workshop was titled "Determining the Role of Livestock in the Potential to Introduce a Pandemic Influenza Virus."
The work falls within the larger umbrella of the USAID-funded Emerging Pandemic Threats (EPT) program, established in 2009 to expand upon the lessons learned in combating the global pandemic of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza, which spread to over 60 countries before being reined in. HPAI however remains entrenched in six countries - and five of them are in Asia. The EPT program addresses the growing array of diseases emerging from the animal kingdom that threaten human health, not just avian influenza.
The influenza pandemic threat is however no less imminent, says FAO, which continues to monitor for any possible emerging influenza virus that could threaten human health, food sources and livelihoods. The newly adapted program, dubbed "EPT Plus," will reflect the honing of FAO's surveillance of influenza viruses over the years, which now increasingly focuses on monitoring for pathogens with pandemic potential in the mixing of crowded human populations with domestic pigs, domestic poultry, wild waterfowl and farmed ducks. In Asia, the crush of these skyrocketing populations could encourage the emergence of new strains of influenza. And as human populations grow and grow in wealth, animal populations are burgeoning too to keep up with the demand for meat and dairy products.
The widening scope reflects FAO's tackling emerging diseases through a "One Health" approach. In One Health, the health of animals, people and the ecosystems that support them are inextricably linked, with even slight changes having repercussions for all of them.
Asia is home to 65 percent of the world's pig population, with China alone accounting for 50 percent of the world total. China and Viet Nam are home to 75 percent of the world's duck population. At the same time, there are seasonal migrations of wild birds that overwinter in these major animal production areas, often mingling with farmed wild birds and ducks that graze openly in rice paddies. On farms, chickens often mix freely with pigs. The close contact among all these species is a tinderbox that risks to produce a highly pathogenic influenza virus that one day could infect humans.
"If a pandemic avian influenza virus emerges in the Sahara, it's never going to matter," said Scott Newman, FAO wildlife epidemiologist and coordinator of FAO's activities under EPT Plus. "But in areas where pigs, birds and people are all living increasingly closer together, that creates the perfect environment for avian influenza viruses to infect pigs, a host where viruses may swap genes and suddenly be passed on to humans in a much more lethal form."
The number and range of potential hosts for influenza viruses living in daily direct contact/close proximity thus may encourage greater genetic diversity of influenza viruses, which multiplies the possible threats to human health, he said.
The program in the four countries will also monitor the major hubs of contact where, if people come into contact repeatedly over time with swine and poultry species, new viruses could emerge. Markets with live animals are one such hub.
The aim is to overlay various data to gain a deeper understanding of what drives the emergence of new influenza viruses with pandemic potential.
Source
FAO
Related topics
Recommend
Comment
Share
Maheswar Rath
19 de abril de 2012

-When there is recommendation to cull all chicken stocks of any farm near to the outbreak area it is best to cull all the identified species by FAO deliberately from this Asian countries if suspected so that FAO will suspect some other species.

-All public sector organization when become indecisive make mistakes. Do the virologists have studied this AI virus properly on zoonotic importance? If there was record of pandemic situation 100 yrs back and killed some million of human then why this issue only came in 2003 only and dragged till date. Was there any record available on the lab test findings of 100-150yrs back?

-Let us take decisions to close the issue through banning the any farming on poultry,pig all over world.This is because we have to worry now tsunami not bird flu.

-FAO is unnecessarily encouraging panic involved issues although impact of AI virus on human has not been sufficiently supported with lab findings to create hypothetical plannings when we have no control on nature and wild animals and wild bird.

-It is only way available to improve immunity of all animals and birds including human beings for combined living on this world with R and D for vaccine development.

-It is essay to plan but can we control natural situations and natural provisions?Let us make stringent action plan for poultry farming and pig farming and cattle farming(AI n B SE) . what to be done what not to be done is now a grate issue? Are we issue wise planning or promoting some issues is getting confused to all.

-one side trade, other side human food of the region. Are welfare points are meant for trade control or rarely we have to stop all animal husbandry activities due to court decisions and FAO,WHO etc rulings need clarification in the present age.

-Let us wait and see at the cost of public money? which is important food and agriculture or human AI issues? what is the balance between all such issues? WHO is correct ? Let us protect the planet by complete stopping the all kinds of mining operation for metals and oil and water so that less stress will be there . Come to stop the wealth fighting first and depend on agriculture only which is natural provisions.

Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.