Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

reproductive biology of nile tilapia Brood Stock Fish

An Attempt to Improve the Reproductive Efficiency of Nile Tilapia Brood Stock Fish

Published: October 15, 2009
By: A.M. Abdelhamid, A. I. Mehrim, Manal I. El-Barbary and M. A. El-Sharawy
ABSTRACT
A field study was conducted on brood stock Nile tilapia to increase the propagation. Both sexes were individually stocked into Habas (enclosures) in an earthen pond and fed for 19 days on a basal diet supplemented with different additives at graded levels of each (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 g Therigon®; 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 g Nuvisol Hatch P®; 20, 40 and 60 mg Gibberllic acid and 700, 900 and 1100 mg L - carnitine / Kg diet). The obtained results were evaluated and the best treatment for each sex was chosen for mating. Results indicated that all pretreatments for males and females brood stocks of Nile tilapia positively affected the total count of the offspring produced. Yet, the Haba, in which the females were pretreated with 0.5 g Therigon® / Kg diet and the males pretreated with 700 mg L - carnitine / Kg diet, gave the highest total count of the offspring comparing with the other  Habas. But, because of the high feed cost due to the additives cost, 0.5 g Therigon® / kg diet as pretreatment for ? only (3rd Haba), 2 g Nuvisol Hatch P® / Kg diet as pretreatment for ? only (5th Haba), followed by  0.5 g Therigon® and 700 mg L - carnitine / Kg diet for ? and ?, respectively (4th Haba), respectively were the best economically.                                                                                      
Key words: Nile tilapia - Brood stock - Feed additives - Reproductive performance. 
INTRODUCTION
 Tilapia aquaculture is and will continue to be an important fish, particularly for the lesser-developed countries in the tropics [1]. Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)  are considered as the most common and popular fish in Egypt. Egypt, a country where, arguably, the farming of tilapia has its roots [2] , where tilapia culture is believed to have originated some 4000 years ago. Tilapia consist 36% of the Egyptian production from fish culture [3] and occupy the 10th order concerning the world production from aquaculture [4]. Hence, Egypt produces 20% of the world tilapia capture and 12% of the world farmed tilapia [5]. The culture of O. niloticus in Egypt has recently developed into a major industry. This industry, however, is still growing in a remarkable way with apparent intend towards intensification that pressurizing the need of enormous number of seeds. Many limitations associated tilapia fry production under the prevailing Egyptian conditions were described by El-Gamal [6]. Also, brood stock husbandry and spawning techniques are constantly upgraded as Egyptian hatcheries require a high number of good quality eggs to satisfy the needs for aquaculture, so rigorous management of large numbers of brood stock are necessary for mass production of eggs and fry due to the complex reproductive biology and asynchronously spawning with relatively small number of eggs produced per spawning. Accordingly, the development of more elaborated forms of brood stock management is crucial to improve fry yield and system efficiency.  Today, it is widely accepted that effective seed production demands a thorough understanding of the special husbandry and particular nutritional requirements of brood stock fish which significantly affect fecundity, survival, egg size and egg and larval quality [7]. The objective of the present research was to study the possibility of improving reproductive performance of Nile tilapia fish using some feed additives.  
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present study was carried out during Nile tilapia hatching season of 2008 (June and July) in  two phases, the first was to study the effects of three commercial feed additives on females (Therigon®, Nuvisol Hatch P® and Gibberllic acid) and fourth one (L - carnitine) on males brood stock, concerning their gonads characteristics and some reproductive traits. The second phase was to select treatments of both 0.5 g Therigon® and 2 g Nuvisol Hatch P® / Kg diet (for females ) and  700 mg L - carnitine / Kg diet (for males )  to apply in a mating trial to be evaluated via hatchability.                                                                                       
Experimental management of the 1st phase:
A field study was conducted in a private earthen pond fish farm located at Alabhar belonging to Alhamol, Kafr Alshiekh governorate. Fourteen Habas (each 3 m width × 6 m length × 0.5 m water depth and 1 m total depth) were constructed in a two Feddans earthen pond. The first ten Habas were stocked with females brood stock of one year (yearlings) Nile tilapia fish (average body weight of 150 g) from the same farm. The other four Habas were stocked with males brood stock of (the same age as the females, but of an average body weight of 200 g) Nile tilapia fish from the same farm also. Each Haba was stocked with twenty fish. This study was a feeding trial to test the effects of some commercial dietary supplements on Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) propagation. The experimental feeding began on the 20th June till the 8th of July, where the feed was offered to fish twice daily, at a daily feeding rate of 3% of the fish biomass in each Haba. The feed additives were purchased from the local market and added directly to a mash diet, which was purchased also from the local market (contained 90.31% dry matter, 80.88 % organic matter, 23.81% crude protein, 5.47% ether extract, and 9.43% ash) after the proximate analysis according to AOAC [8] and moistened to be pelleted via a hand mincer. The feeding continued for males and females before mating. Water of fish rearing in each individual Haba was tested daily for some water quality parameters including water temperature, pH value, and dissolved oxygen concentration.                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
Dietary treatments during the 1st phase:
 Fish were fed on a basal ration (BR) with or without (control) the tested feed additives (as illustrated in the following Table 1) which were:
1- Therigon® powder for veterinary use, manufactured by Adwia Co., S. A. E. 10th of Ramadan city, Egypt. Each 1 g contains Alpha - Amino - p - hydroxyhydrocynnamic acid, 1000 g package as GnRH stimulant (Batch No. 0601116).                                   
2- Nuvisol Hatch P®, imported by Khirat Alnile Co., 27 Alferdos Buildings, Flat 43, Nasr city, Egypt from Newtrix Co., Belgium, in 500 g package. Each 1 Kg contains the following vitamins (in mg): B1 4000, B2 5000, B3 4000, B6 2000, B9 1000, B12 20, PP 10000, Biotin 50, and L - carnitine 30000.                                                        
3- Gibberllic acid (C19 H22 O6), type analysis, Art. 3930,  M. W. 346.38, M. P. 225 °C,  GA3 content 90 %, 1 g  package, Batch No. 43124, imported from Lobal Chemie, Pvt. LTD, 2042 Bombay, India.                                                                       
 4- L - carnitine powder from Mebaco, Egypt.
       Table1: Explanation of the experimental diets during the 1st phase
Diets
Haba's No. & sex
Basal ration (control femeles)
1, ?
Basal ration + 0.5 g Therigon®/ kg diet
, ?2
Basal ration + 1.0 g Therigon®/ kg diet
3, ?
Basal ration + 2.0 g Therigon®/ kg diet
, ? 4
Basal ration + 1 g Nuvisol Hatch P® / Kg diet
, ?5
Basal ration + 2 g Nuvisol Hatch P® / Kg diet
, ?6
Basal ration + 3 g Nuvisol Hatch P® / Kg diet
, ? 7
Basal ration + 20 mg Gibberllic acid / Kg diet
? 8,
Basal ration + 40 mg Gibberllic acid / Kg diet
9, ?
Basal ration + 60 mg Gibberllic acid / Kg diet
,?10
Basal ration (control males)
11, ?
Basal ration + 700 mg L - carnitine / Kg diet
12, ?
Basal ration + 900 mg L - carnitine / Kg diet
13, ?
Basal ration + 1100 mg L - carnitine / Kg diet
, ?14
Criteria measured at the end of the 1st phase:
After the 19 days feeding trial of the separate sexes of brood stock, three fish from each experimental Haba were catched to collect blood, seeds (eggs), and milt for different measurements and determinations. Tri sodium citrate was used as an anticoagulant for blood collection. Blood determinations for follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone hormone were done using commercial colorimetric kits (Diamond, Diagnostic, Egypt), and milt analyses (count, motility, forward, sluggish and dead percents) were done too.
Experimental management during the 2nd phase:
Six Habas (similar to those used in phase one, in the same earthen pond, at the same private farm) were used in the second phase (beginning from the 9th of July) of this study. The Habas were stocked with 9 females and 3 males each (sex ratio 3 ?: 1 ?) to test the best treatments from phase one as following in Table 2:
Table 2: Explanation of the experimental reproductivetrait during the 2nd phase:
? × ?from the 1st phase
Haba's No.
?fed on  Basal ration (BR) × ? fed on  BR
1
? fed on BR × ? fed on BR + 700 mg L - carnitine / Kg diet
2
? fed on BR + 0.5 g Therigon®/ kg diet × ? fed on  BR
3
? fed on BR + 0.5 g Therigon®/ kg diet × ? fed on BR + 700 mg L - carnitine / Kg diet
4
? fed on BR +2 g Nuvisol Hatch P® / Kg diet × ? fed on  BR
5
? fed on BR +2 g Nuvisol Hatch P® / Kg diet × ? fed on BR + 700 mg L - carnitine / Kg diet  
6
The level 0.5 g Therigon® / Kg diet was chosen for its high value of FSH (Table 7), 2 g Nuvisol Hatch P® / Kg diet was chosen for its high value of progesterone (Table 7). On the 22nd July, the fry were collected and counted. Throughout this phase also, water quality parameters were measured daily as in phase one, at 9 - 11 am.
Statistical analysis:                                                                                                        
Data collected were statistically analyzed using SAS [9], when ANOVA-test was significant (P ≤ 0.05), least significant difference was calculated [10] to differentiate between means.                            
RESULTS
As shown from Table 3, there were no significant differences among all Habas concerning the tested water quality parameters. Therefore, the data were presented as overall means ± standard errors (SE). The tested parameters showed very suitable water conditions for rearing tilapia.
Table 3 Mean values of some quality parameters of the Habas' waters used for rearing Nile tilapia brood stock in an earthen pond throughout the experimental course.
Dissolved Oxygen, mg / l
The pH values
Temperature, °C
Item
5.70 ± 0.11
7.50 ± 0.06
29.4 ± 0.19
Mean ± SE
 
Data of the studied females' reproductive traits are illustrated in Table 4. Except GSI, the other tested parameters showed significant (P ≤ 0.05) differences among treatments. The significantly heavier body weight (288.9 ± 23.8 g) after the 19 day-study was realized by the fish in the 8th Haba (20 mg gibberllic acid / Kg diet) followed by Haba No. 6 (2 g Nuvisol Hatch P® / Kg diet) without significant difference  between both Habas (6 & 8). The best (P ≤ 0.05) ovaries weight (11.5 ± 0.07 g) was recorded in fish of the 4th Haba (2 g Therigon® / Kg diet); yet, there were no significant differences among all treatments and the control. Egg number per fish was the highest (935.5 ± 120.2 and 926.0 ± 12.7) significantly (P ≤ 0.05) by the 5th  and 3rd Habas' fish (treated with 1 g Nuvisol Hatch P® / Kg diet and 1 g Therigon® / kg diet), respectively. Yet, the egg number / Kg fish weight (fecundity) of these fish groups in Habas No. 5 and 3 did not differ significantly (P ≥ 0.05) with the control, which was better (P ≤ 0.05) than all the other treatments. Moreover, the lowest (P ≤ 0.05) egg diameter was reflected by the fish groups of Habas No. 6 and 5, being 0.96 ± 0.06 and 1.25± 0.00 mm. Otherwise, all other treatments were significantly similar to the control.
Table 4: Females' sexual parameters of brood stock Nile tilapia as affected by the dietary supplementations for 19 days feeding trial in Habas in an earthen pond (means* ± SE).                                                                                                                                                                            
GSI***
Egg diameter, mm
Egg No./Kg BW**
Egg number / fish
Ovaries weight, g
Fish weight, g
Haba No.
4.71a
± 0.31
1.55a
± 0.12
4341a
± 224.8
769.3b
± 34.4
8.45ab
± 1.35
178.1b
± 17.1
1
4.26a
± 0.76
1.55a
± 0.12
3267bcd
± 491.1
689.0bc
± 99.0
9.00ab
± 0.90
211.7b
± 5.70
2
4.03a
± 0.38
1.55a
± 0.12
4114ab
± 360.1
926.0a
± 9.00
9.25ab
± 1.75
227.0b
± 22.1
3
5.14a
± 0.70
1.67a
± 0.00
3037cde
± 286.8
698.3bc
± 14.3
11.5a
± 0.05
227.0b
± 32.1
4
4.02a
± 0.59
1.25b
± 0.00
4171ab
± 445.0
935.5a
± 85.2
9.00ab
± 1.20
224.5b
± 3.50
5
4.42a
± 0.38
0.96c
± 0.04
2161ef
± 138.2
519.0de
± 74.2
10.7ab
± 1.75
239.0ab
± 19.1
6
3.49a
± 1.44
1.67a
± 0.00
2423def
± 163.7
537.5d
± 12.6
7.5ab
± 2.50
223.2b
± 20.3
7
3.28a
± 0.83
1.67a
± 0.00
2191ef
± 176.8
630.0bcd
± 14.1
7.90ab
± 0.40
288.9a
± 16.9
8
3.30a
± 1.22
1.67a
± 0.00
3376bc
± 93.9
602.0cd
± 0.00
5.95b
± 2.35
178.5b
± 4.96
9
4.41a
± 0.40
1.67a
± 0.00
1754f
± 68.5
391.5e
± 12.6
10.1ab
± 0.05
223.9b
± 15.9
10
* Means with the same letter within the same column don't differ significantly (P ≥ 0.05).
**: BW=body weight.
***: GSI = gonado - somatic index = gonads weight (g) × 100 / fish weight (g). 
Tables 5 and 6 present data of males reproductive traits tested including testes weight and GSI as well as milt quality parameters. Although there were no significant differences among treatments and the control; yet, the control was more pronounced in fish weight, testes weight, GSI, and sperms count than the treatments. But the motility and dead percentages were better in fish group of Haba No. 12 (700 mg L - carnitine / Kg diet) followed by Haba No. 13 (900 mg L - carnitine / Kg diet) concerning motility, forward, sluggish and dead percentages.
Table 5: Males' gonado - somatic index of brood stock Nile tilapia as affected by the dietary supplementations for 19 days feeding trial in Habas in an earthen pond (means* ± SE).                                                                                         
GSI**
Testes weight, g
Fish weight, g
Haba No.
1.425
± 0.01
 4.050  
± 0.05
283.05
± 0.85
11
0.965
± 0.32
2.350
± 0.95
236.10
± 22.3
12
1.035
± 0.12
2.550
±0.05
250.00
± 33.0
13
0.915
± 0.24
2.450
± 0.75
263.55
 ± 14.0
14
*:Means don't differ significantly (P ≥ 0.05).
**: GSI = gonado - somatic index = gonads weight (g) × 100 / fish weight (g). 
Table 6: Data of some quality parameters of milt (using Hämocytometer slide) collected from the tested males brood stock Nile tilapia as affected by the dietary supplementations for 19 days feeding trial in Habas in an earthen pond.                                                                                                               
Dead, %
Sluggish, %
Forward, %
Motility (viability), %
Count, × 106
Haba No.
35
45
20
55
660
11
25
40
35
75
450
12
30
40
50
60
350
13
30
45
35
45
390
14
Data of serum sexual hormones of the experimental fish are presented in Table 7. Females fish of the 3rd and 5th Habas reflected lower concentrations of (FSH) but higher concentrations of either (LH) or progesterone hormone, comparing with the other Habas' fish. This is in good accordance with the fecundity which was given in Table 4. Also, male fish of the 12th and 13th Habas (Table 7) had sera with higher levels of FSH, LH, and testosterone comparing with the other treatments. This also confirms the previous results of the milt analysis for its quality parameters (Table 6).               
Table 7: Data of blood sera analysis for sexual hormones of the tested Nile tilapia brood stock fish as affected by the dietary treatments for 19 days during rearing in Habas stocked in an earthen pond.                                                     
Progesterone (?) / testosterone (?), ng / ml
LH, u / ml
FSH, u / ml
Haba's No. & sex
0.014
19
32
1, ?
0.110
18
91
2, ?
0.080
19
13
3, ?
0.060
61
83
4, ?
0.130
52
14
5, ?
0.140
48
63
6, ?
0.009
27
16
7, ?
0.006
84
72
8, ?
0.003
26
14
9, ?
0.017
28
84
10, ?
2.780
59
48
11, ?
4.310
76
89
12, ?
5.140
89
78
13, ?
1.010
38
24
14, ?
The following Table 8 shows that all pretreatments for males and females brood stocks of Nile tilapia positively affected propagation (2nd phase of the experiment, mating), i. e total count of the offspring produced. Yet, the 4th Haba  (in which the females were pretreated with 0.5 g Therigon® / Kg diet and the males were pretreated with 700 mg L - carnitine / Kg diet, for 19 days before mating or fertilization) gave the highest total count of the offspring comparing with the other  Habas. But, the 3rd, 5th, and 4th Habas were the best economically, since they were responsible for 43.5, 31.7, and 25.3 % superiority than the control (1st Haba).                                                                                                                    
Table 8: Total count of the offspring produced at the end of phase two as affected by  the dietary pretreatment of the brood stock in phase one and economic efficiency.                                                                                                         
Economic efficiency
Consumed feed price, LE
Fry price, LE/1000
Fry count
Haba's No.
Relative
Absolute*
100.0
48.77
2.44
119.0
3400
1
78.74
38.40
3.19
122.5
3500
2
143.5
70.00
2.00
140.0
4000
3
125.3
61.09
2.75
168.0
4800
4
131.7
64.22
2.18
140.0
4000
5
100.1
48.80
2.94
143.5
4100
6
* Economic efficiency = Income from buying the produced fry in LE / feed costs of  the brood stock during the pretreatment in LE, where the local  price of 1000 fry was 35 LE and for 1 Kg diet without additives was 2.2 LE.                                                   
DISCUSSION
The quality of fish rearing water did not influence by the experimental treatments, and was suitable for rearing Nile tilapia brood stock according to Abdelhamid [11].                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Reproductive performance of fish is influenced by many factors, e.g. feeding regime including dietary protein [12-14] and vitamin [15, 16] levels, feeding rate [17], and hatchery management [18], as well as endocrine regulation [19-24]. Other environmental conditions may also affect, including photoperiod and water temperature [25-27] as well as water depth [28]  
The fish farming industry has been more focused on the quality of eggs or larvae rather than that of sperm, even though the quality of both gametes may affect fertilization success and larval survival. Sperm quality in farmed fish may be affected by different components of brood stock husbandry, during collection and storage of sperm prior to fertilization or the fertilization procedure. Motility is most commonly used since high motility is a prerequisite for fertilization and correlates strongly with fertilization success [29].
Gibberellins (GAs) are involved in a wide range of plant developmental processes. Of all the plant hormones the GAs represent perhaps the most diverse group, with currently 126 different structures known [30]. Gibberellins are tetracyclic diterpenes that are found in plants and fungi. A few of the identified to date are known to be active hormones that are involved in seed germination, seedling emergence, stem elongation, fertility, and flower and fruit development. The gibberellin receptor has not yet been conclusively identified. GAs act in stem growth via an enhancement of both cell division and cell elongation. Gibberellins get their unusual name from the fungus Gibberella fujikuroi, from which they were first isolated [31]. GA3 is naturally widespread than the other gibberellins which have sexual influences [32]. GA3 has a pesticide effect [33], and also carcinogenic effect on rectal protozoon [34] and Egyptian toads' liver [35]. But, [36] clearly demonstrated that it was essentially nontoxic by various routs of applications for different animal species.                                                                                                   
Yet, it promotes growth of rats, poultry, pigs, and calves [37, 38] as well as it improves laying hens' production, concerning egg production, egg mass and hatchability [39, 40]. Gibberellins have an estrogenic effect on animals [41]. It increased blood protein significantly, but affected different organs weight and their histology in chickens [42]. In fish, GA3 at low levels improved Nile tilapia growth and gonado-somatic index [43], since it is a nitrogenous compound [37] with estrogenic effect; where it increased the percent of egg production, hatchability and ovary and oviduct relative weight significantly [44]. So using natural GA3 instead of the synthetic estrogen is safer and environmentally friend therefore should be considered.                                                                                                                   
L-carnitine is a naturally occurring amino acid derivative (dipeptide amino acid), synthesized from methionine and lysine. L-carmitin, a betaine derivative of β - hydroxybutyrate, could be biosynthesized in plant and animal cells via lysine, methionine, and some vitamins like B6, C, nicotinic acid and folate [45]. It is an essential cofactor of fatty acid metabolism (it provides energy by transporting long and medium chain fatty acids to mitochondria to act as fuel). Deficiency in carnitine is associated with male infertility. Since L-carnitine provides an energetic substrate for the spermatozoa in the epidydimis, contributes directly to sperm motility and may be involved in the successful maturation of the sperm. Carnitine lowers triglycerides and raises the high density lipoprotein levels. L-isomer of carnitine is more effective than DL - isomer [46].        
Cellular parameters of the seminogram have been previously shown to correlate with L-carnitine concentration in the seminal fluid. Carnitine is involved in maintaining an active oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Therefore, it was strongly suggested that relationship between carnitine secretions, seminal quality and OXPHOS activities could be because of a parallel response to the same regulatory event [47, 48]. L-carnitine improved semen quality and histological characteristics of the testes [49]. Generally, a low level of L-carnitine enrichment provides several protective effects in fish reared under intensive pond-culture conditions [50-52].
Pituitary homogenate induced artificially maturing and increased both serum testosterone and estradiol [53]. Gonadotropin-releasing hormones (GnRHs) bind to the specific receptor on the gonadotrophs to activate the synthesis and release of gonadotropins (follicle stimulating hormone or FSH and luteinizing hormone or LH), which in turn control gonadal maturation, gametogenesis and gamete release [54, 55]. Not only do teleosts exhibit the highest variety of GnRH variants, but recent data and whole genome analyses indicate that they may also possess multiple GnRH receptor [56]. Synthetic analog of gonadotropin-releasing hormone was used for inducing ovulation and enhancing spermiation in brood fish [57]. Moreover, territorial males of African cichlid, Haplochromis burtoni, characterized by aggressive and reproductive activity, have significantly larger hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-containing neurons and larger testes than nonterritorial males [58].
Dietary inclusion of 1 g Nuvisol Hatch P® / Kg diet and 1 g Therigon® / kg diet before mating realized good females reproduction performance. Also, dietary supplementation with 700 and 900 mg L-carnitine / Kg diet before mating gave better results of males' reproductive performance. But, because of the high feed cost due to the additives cost, 0.5 g Therigon® / kg diet as pretreatment for ? only (3rd Haba of the 2nd phase, mating), 2 g Nuvisol Hatch P® / Kg diet as pretreatment for ? only (5th Haba of the 2nd phase, mating), followed by  0.5 g Therigon® and 700 mg L-carnitine / Kg diet for ? and ?, respectively (4th Haba of the 2nd phase, mating), respectively were the best economically. 
It could be recommended to use such commercial feed additives for improving reproductive performance of Nile tilapia brood stocks to offer enough seeds for fish farms .It is recommend also to make other trials on different other additives at economical levels.                                                                                                                 
REFERENCES
1-     FAO 2001. FAO yearbook, Fishery statistics, Aquaculture production 1999. Vol     88/2. 
2- Stickney, R.R. 2006.  Foreword.  In: El-Sayed, A.M. (author) Tilapia Culture, CABI Publishing, U.K.                                                                                                 
3- Sadek, S. 2000.  Aquaculture in Egypt: Past evaluation, present status and priorities for research to secure a sustainable development.  Proc. Inter. Conf. AQUA 2000, Nice, France, May 2-6, p: 620.                                                  
4- Van Hauwaert, A., C. Melard, P. Verstraete, and R.Berzak, 2000.  Development of a cold season diet for tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Proc. Inter. Conf. AQUA 2000, Nice, France, May 2 - 6, p: 728.                                                                       
5-   El-Sayed, A.M. 2006.  Tilapia Culture; CABI Publishing, U. K.                                
6- El-Gamal, A.A. 2002. Basic Management techniques and reproductive performance of brood tilapia Oreochromis niloticus kept under recycling water systems. The 1st Annual Conference of the Egyptian Aquaculture Society. 13th - 15th Dec., Al-Arish, Egypt.
7- Bromage N, 1998. Broodstock management and the optimisation of seed supplies.    Suisan Zoshoku 46, pp. 395-401.
8- AOAC 2000.  Association of Official Analytical Chemists of Official Methods of Analysis.  17th Ed., Washington, DC
9- SAS. 2001. SAS procedure user's guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
10 -   Duncan, D. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F - tests. Biometrics, 11: 1 - 42.    
11- Abdelhamid, A.M. 2009. Fundamentals of Fish Production and Pisciculture. New Universal Office, Alexandria, Egypt. 1st Ed., Deposit No. 24400 / 2008, I.S.B.N. 977-438-052-5.
12- Gunasekera, R.M. and T.J. Lam, 1997. Influence of dietary protein level on ovarian recrudescence in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L). Aquaculture, 149: 57 - 69.                                                                                                        
13- Khalil, F.F, A.M Abdelhamid, and M.E.A Mostafa, 2001. Nutritional influences on Nile tilapia broodstock fish (Oreochromis niloticus). 2- Seed production and fecundity. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds, 4 (Special Issue):   695 - 704.                                                                                            
14- Abdelhamid, A.M, F.M Khalil, and M.E.A. Mostafa, 2003. Nutritional influences on Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) broodstock. 4- Growth performance of fry. Proc. 2nd Inter. Conf. on Anim. Prod. & Health in   Semi arid areas. Al-Arish, Egypt, pp: 645 - 654.
15- Abdelhamid, A.M., F.M Khalil, and M.R Essa, 1999a. Effect of graded levels of vitamins C and / or E in diets of Nile tilapia broodstock fishes (Oreochromis niloticus) on: 1- Growth performance, chemical composition and feed utilization. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds, 2 (Special Issue): 823 - 838. 
16- Abdelhamid, A.M, F.M Khalil, and M.R. Essa, 1999b. Effect of graded levels of vitamins C and/or E in diets of Nile tilapia broodstock fishes (Oreochromis niloticus) on: 1- Reproductive performance. Journal of Agricultural Sciences Mansoura Univ., Egypt, 24: 4655 - 4670.                                                                  
17- Abou-Zied, R. M. 2006. Effect of feeding regimes on reproductive performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) broodfish in a commercial hatchery. Fayoum. Journal of Agriculture  Research and Development, 20: 242 - 249
18- Abou-Zied, R.M. and A.A.A. Ali, 2007. Evaluation of Nile tilapia commercial hatcheries systems in Fayoum governorate. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fishery, 11: 230 - 238.                                                                                                    
19- Melamed, P.; H. Rosenfeld, A. Elizur, and Z. Yaron, 1998. Endocrine regulation of gonadotropin and growth hormone gene transcription in fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Endocrinology 119: 325 - 338
20- Daghash, H.A. and S.Y. Hussein, 1999. The role of gonadotropin releasing  hormone (GnRH) injection on spawning, spermiation, some blood constituents and sex hormones in the African catfish, Clarias                                          gariepinus. Egyptian Society for Animal Reproduction and Fertility, 11th Ann. Congr., Giza 26 - 28 Jan.,pp: 185 - 202.                                                                                          
21- Adebayo, O.T. and O.A. Fagbenro, 2004. Induced ovulation and spawning of pond raised African giant catfish, Heterobranchus bidorsalis by exogenous hormones. Aquaculture, 242: 229 - 236.                                                         
22- Levavi-Sivan, B., H. Safarian, H. Rosenfeld, A. Elizur, and A. Avitan, 2004. Regulation of gonadotropin - releasing hormone (GnRH) - recepror gene expression in tilapia: effect of GnRH and dopamine. Biology of                                 Reproduction. Society for the Study of Reproduction, Madison, USA, 70: 1545 - 1551.                                                                                    
23- Levavi-Sivan, B., J. Biran, and E. Fireman, 2006. Sex steroids are involved in the regulation of gonadotropin - releasing hormone and dopamine D2 receptors in female tilapia pituitary. Biology of Reproduction, 75: 642 - 650.                      
24- Sharaf, S.M. 2005. Effect of gonadotropin - releasing gormone (GnRHs) and human chronic gonadotropin (HCG) on ovarian development and plasma levels of sex steroids in African catfish Clarias gariepinus. Egyptian Journal  of Applied  Science, 20: 23 - 37.                                                                                 
25- El-Nady, M.A., G.A. El - Naggar, M.G. Kamar, and A.I. Al - Kobaby, 1999. Effect of photoperiod, crude protein level and water temperature on reproduction performance and egg hatchability of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Bull. Fac. Agric., Cairo Univ., 50: 591 - 608.
26- Campos - Mendoza, A., B. J.McAndrew, K.Coward, and N.Bromage, 2004.                      Reproductive response of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to                                   photoperiodic manipulation; effects on spawning periodicity, fecundity and egg size. Aquaculture, 231: 1 - 2.                                                                                                         
27- Kamanga, L. J., E. Kaunda, Mtimuni, J. P., A. O. Maluwa, and W. M. Mfitilodze, 2004. Effect of temperature on oocyte development of Oreochromis karongae (Trewavas, 1941). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 20: 139 - 145.                   
28- Salem, M. F. I.; Mehrim, A. I. M.; and Baromh, M. Z. 2005. Effect of varying depth of water column in concrete hatching ponds on productivity of Nile tilapia brood stock. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Mansoura Univ., Egypt, 30: 2419 - 2426.                   
29- Rurangwa, E., D.E. Kime, F. Ollevier, and J.P. Nash, 2004. The measurement of sperm motility and factors affecting sperm quality in cultured fish. Aquaculture, 234: 1 - 28.
30- Croker, S. J. and P. Hedden, 2001. Analysis of gibberellins. In: Tucker, G. A. and Roberts, J. A. (Eds.) Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 141: Plant Hormone Protocols. Humana Press Inc., Totowa, New Jersey. PP: 93 - 98.               
31- Sponsel, V.M. 2001. Gibberellins. In: Henry, H. L. and Norman, A. W. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Hormones, Elsevier Academic Press, California, 2120 P.      
32- Hifny, H.A. 1974. Proceedings of the 1st meeting of the Egyptian Horticulture Society on growth regulators, Cairo, 28 Nov., 1972.                                        
33- WHO 1990. Public Health Impact of Pesticides in Agriculture. WHO / UNEP, Geneva.                                                                                                             
34- El-Mofty, M.M. 1974. Induction of sexual reproduction in Opalina sudafricana  by injecting its host Bufo regularis with gibberellic acid. International Journal for Parasitology, 4: 203 - 206.
35 El-Mofty, M.M. and S.A. Sakr, 1988. Induction of neoplasms in the Egyptian toad Bufo regularis by gibberellin A3. Oncology, 45: 61 - 64.                          
36- Macgregor, R.C. 1988. In: Haresign, W. and Cole, D.J.A. (Eds.) Recent Development in Ruminant Nutrition. Butterworths.                                        
37- Alkhaiat, A.A., H. Morsy, E. Shehata, and A. Abdellatif, 1981. Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology. Ministry of High Education and Scientific Research. Iraq. 
38- Abdelhamid, A.M., T. M. Dorra, M.A. Ali, and El.H Abou-Egla, 1993. Effect of gibberellic acid (GA3) - including diets on broiler chickens. Proc. The 4th Symp. on Food Pollution, 15 - 16 Nov. Assiut, Egypt, pp: 43 - 57.
39- Anderson, D.L., R.D. Witkowsky, and A.M. Gawienowski, 1982. Poultry Science, 61: 1660 (cited from Abdelhamid et al., 1994).
40- Abdel-Fattah, S.A.; N.K. Soliman, and Sh.F. Afifi, 2007. Effect of dietary cholecalciferol levels and gibberellic acid on productive and reproductive traits, serum profile and bone mineralization of laying quail. Egyptian Poultry Science, 27: 785 - 803.                                                                                          
41- Marasas, W.F.O.; P.E. Nelson, and T.A. Toussoun, 1984. Toxigenic Fusarium Species. Identity and Mycotoxicology. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park and London.                                                                  
42- Abdelhamid, A.M., T.M. Dorra, M.A. Ali, and, El.H. Abou-Egla, 1994. Effect of gibberellic acid on broiler chickens performance and some metabolic parameters. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 46: 269 - 276.                              
43- Abdelhamid, A.M.; F.M. Khalil, and M.I. El-Barbary, 1998. Effect of using graded levels of gibberellic acid in diets differing in the crude protein levels on performance and chemical composition of Nile tilapia fingerlings. Egyptian Journal of Aquaculture and Fisheries, 2: 221 - 233.                                                                 
44- El-Sebai, A., M. Abaza, and S.A. Elnagar, 2003. Physiological effects of gibberellic acid (GA3) on female Japanese quail production and reproduction.  Egyptian Poultry Science, 23: 977 - 992
45- Zeyner, A. and J. Hameyer, 1999. Metabolic functions of L-carnitine and its effects as feed additive in horses, a review. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 52: 115 - 138.         
46- Chatzifotis, S., T. Takeuchi, and T. Seikai, 1995. The effect of dietary L - carnitine on growth performance and lipid composition in red sea bream fingerlings. Fish. Sci.,   61:1004 -1008.                                               
47- Ruiz-Pesini, E., E. Alvarez, J.A. Enriquez, and M.J. L?pez-Pérez, 2001. Association between seminal plasma carnitine and sperm mitochondrial enzymatic activities. International Journal of Andrology, 24: 335 - 340.       
48- Agarwal, A. and T. M. Said, 2004. Carnitines and male infertility. Reproductive BioMedicine, 8: 376 - 384.                                                                      
49- El-Damrawy, S.Z. 2007. L - carnitine supplementation for age - induced reproductive criteria in male pigons. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Mansoura Univ., 32:  8915 - 8929.                                                                                                   
50- Schlechtriem, C., V. Bresler, L. Fishelson, M. Rosenfeld, and K. Becker. 2004. Protective effects of dietary L-carnitine on tilapia hybrids (Oreochromis niloticus × Oreochromis aureus) reared under intensive pond-culture conditions. Aquaculture Nutrition, 10: 55 - 63.                                                 
51- Ali, A.A. 2005. Studies on some productive traits in fish.  PhD. Thesis, Fac. Agric. Moshtohor, Benha Univ., Egypt.                                                                                 
52- Harpaz, S. 2005. L - carnitine and its attributed functions in fish culture and nutrition - a review. Aquaculture, 249: 3 - 21.                                                
53- Matsubara, H., P. M. Lokman, Y. Kazeto, S. Adachi, and K.Yamauchi, 2005. Serum steroid profiles in artificially maturing female Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica. Aquaculture, 243: 393 - 402.                                                            
54- Alok, D., S. Hassin, R.S. Kumar, J.M. Trant, K. Yu, and Y. Zohar, 2000. Characterization of a pituitary GnRH-receptor from a perciform fish, Morone saxatilis: functional expression in a fish cell line. Molecular and Cellular                     Endocrinology, 168: 65 - 75.                                                                           
55- Hu, W., S. Li, B. Tang, Y. Wang, H. Lin, X. Liu, J. Zou, and Z. Zhu, 2007. Antisense for gonadotropin-releasing hormone reduces gonadotropin synthesis and gonadal development in transgenic common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquaculture, 271: 498 - 506.                                                               
56- Lethimonier, C., T. Madigou, J. Muñoz-Cueto, J. Lareyre, and O. Kah, 2004.  Evolutionary aspects of GnRHs, GnRH neuronal systems and GnRH receptors in teleost fish. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 135: 1 - 16.                                                                                                                    
57- Mylonas, C. C., Y. Tabata, R. Langer, and Y. Zohar, 1995. Preparation and evaluation of polyanhydride microspheres containing gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), for inducing ovulation and spermiation in fish. Journal of Controlled Release, 35: 23 - 34.                                                                       
58- Soma, K.K., R.C. Francis, J.C. Wingfield, and R.D. Fernald, 1996. Androgen regulation of hypothalamic neurons containing gonadotropin-releasing hormone in a cichlid fish: integration with social cues. Hormones and Behavior, 30: 216 - 226.
Related topics
Authors:
A.M. Abdelhamid
Mansoura University, Egypt
Follow
Join to be able to comment.
Once you join Engormix, you will be able to participate in all content and forums.
* Required information
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Create a post
Polin
15 de octubre de 2012

This is very importent paper about Reproductive Efficiency of Nile Tilapia.

Ediwarman
Jambi Freshwater Aquaculture Development Center
5 de abril de 2011

I am very interesting this paper about reproductive efficiency of Nile Tilapia.

Salve Sevilleno
Salve Sevilleno
26 de noviembre de 2009
good day!! i have paper works about genetically modified tilapia.. can you cite some important articles about it? thanks..i will wait for your reply..ASAP... thanks again
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.
LoginRegister