Explore

Advertise on Engormix

The effect of feed physical form on commercial layer nutrition

Published: October 20, 2011
Source : LCGS Barbosa1*, MT Antunes1, CC Silva1, MA Trindade Neto1, LM Gomes2, BV Freitas1, TCF Carlos2, CC Silva2, CSS Araujo1, LF Araujo1,2 1College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry, USP, 2College of Animal Husbandry and Food Engineering, USP. B
Summary

An experiment was conducted to examine the effects of feed physical form on layer performance, egg production, egg quality, and body temperature. Every day, 100 g feed with different water inclusion levels were given/bird/day. One hundred and ninety-two Hyline W-36, 48-week-old hens were allocated to treatment groups, following at a completely-at-random design with six treatments (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% water inclusion in the feed) and four 8-bird repetitions. Water inclusion in the feed resulted in improved animal performance, and increased egg production.
Key Words: Laying hens, Performance, Water.

Introduction
Water is an essential nutrient for life. In the body, water performs several biologic functions in addition of being a fundamental constituent of both intra-cellular and extra-cellular fluids. Water is the most abundant component in live beings, and its content varies depending on animal species, body fat levels, and animal age.
Body water content in the hen varies depending mainly on bird's age, but generally it represents  ̴ 85% of live weight during the first week of life,  ̴ 70% by week 4, and  ̴ 60%, in the adult stage. Water represents nearly 65% of egg weight (Gama et al., 2008).
Regardless of ambient temperature variations birds, as homeotherms, have the ability to maintain body temperature. Factors leading to increased body temperature beyond certain limits due to either environmental or physiological conditions, can be lethal for the bird (Yahav et al., 2000). Therefore, water plays an important temperature-regulating function thus being extremely beneficial for birds, particularly in hot environments (Forbes, 2003).
Birds typically receive water and feed separately, different from swine in certain production stages, when feed and water are mixed together resulting in a paste or a slurry that are better accepted by animals. Historically, the addition of water to industrial poultry diets has not been recommended, due to the difficulties in implementing such practice. Even though, some workers have recently reported results from this feeding regime (Forbes, 2003).
Due to the high level of specialization that the poultry industry has reached, novel nutritional alternatives need to be proposed, in order to make the most of birds' full genetic potential. One major challenge today is assuring that birds consume the necessary amount of ingredients for maximum performance (Araújo, 2003).
In layers, feed intake is closely related with water intake, so that any problems affecting water intake will impact feed intake, and vice versa (Gama et al., 2008). Administering a moist diet to birds can result in improved production and performance levels.
The objective of this study was to evaluate different feed physical forms in commercial layers by the addition of various water inclusion levels, on productive performance parameters.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was carried out in the experimental poultry farm, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry, Sao Paulo State University (USP), Pirassununga campus, SP, Brazil. One hundred and ninety two (192) Hyline W-36, 48-week-old hens were distributed using a completely-at-random design, with 6 treatments (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% water inclusion in the feed) and four 8-bird repetitions. The basal diet was formulated with corn and soybean meal, in accordance with the levels recommended by Rostagno (2005), as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Nutritional composition of the basal diet
Ingredient
%
Corn
65.41
Soybean meal
18.87
Wheat meal
4.50
Lysine
0.02
Limestone
9.02
Dicalcium phosphate
1.26
Salt
0.42
Vit/Min Supl*
0.50
Zinc oxide
0.00
Inert material
0.00
Total
100
ME, kcal/kg
2,750
Crude protein(%)
15.00
Methionine (%)
0.40
Met + cys (%)
0.65
Lysine (%)
0.72
Ca
3.8
P
0.64
Mineral Premix  - Composition per kg of product: 65,000 mg Manganese; 40,000 mg Iron; 10,000 mg Copper; 50,000 mg Zinc; 1,000 mg Iodine; Carrier, qs 1,000 g. Vitamin Premix - Composition per kg of product: 1,750,000 IU Vit. A; 500,000 IU Vit D3; 1,000 mg Vit E; 500 mg Vit K3; 500 mg Vit B1; 750 mg Vit. B2; 2,000 mcg Vit. B12; 1,250 mg Calcium Pantotenate; 75 mg Selenium; 125 g Choline; 25 g Antioxidant; Carrier qs 1,000 g.
The following performance parameters were recorded: feed intake (g/bird/day), feed conversion rate (g feed/g egg) and egg production (% eggs/bird). On the last two days of each period daily egg production was collected in order to determine egg weight/egg mass (g), specific gravity, eggshell thickness, and percent eggshell.
Every day, animals were fed 100 g feed/bird/day in order to facilitate water addition at the proportions established for each treatment. Feed leftovers were weighed on the following morning. Feed intake was determined daily by deducting leftovers from feed served. Results were expressed based on dietary dry matter intake.
Specific gravity was determined as recommended by Moreng and Avens (1990). Eggshells were dried at ambient temperature for 7 days then weighed, in order to estimate eggshell %. Eggshell thickness was measured at egg equator using a micrometer with a 0.01 mm precision and a 0.01 - 10.00 mm range.
Egg mass (g/bird/day) was estimated at the end of each experimental period by multiplying mean weight times mean egg production.
Body temperatures were recorded weekly using an infrared thermometer in 3 body regions (comb, back, and legs) of two animals per repetition. In addition rectal temperatures were also recorded. All temperatures were measured always at the same time in the day in order to avoid variations derived from ambient temperature.
Experimental data was analyzed using the SAS software (2001), and the means were compared using Tukey's test (P<0.05).
Results and Discussion
Results showed that as water inclusion levels in the feed were increased, feed conversion rates decreased. Also, hens fed the diet with 30% added water had increased egg production as compared with the controls (Table 1).
Table 2. Mean feed conversion rate (FCR, g feed /g egg) and egg production (EP, % eggs/bird) in commercial layers fed diets with various levels of water inclusion
Treatment
Fe Intake (g)
FCR (g/g)
EP (%)
0
83b
1.78e
73.55b
10
88a
1.66d
84.26a
20
82b
1.59bd
83.54a
30
76c
1.52b
81.36a
40
70c
1.43b
77.68ab
50
58d
1.22a
76.90b
CV (%)
2.44
3.23
4.51
Probability
0.0013
0.0041
0.0018
Significant differences (P<0.05) among means as per Tukey's test.
No statistically-significant differences (P>0.05) were observed in egg weight, eggshell thickness, % eggshell or egg specific gravity. Nevertheless, treatments with water inclusion resulted in positive effects on egg mass (Table 3).
Table 3. Egg quality parameters: egg weight (g), egg mass (g), eggshell thickness (mm), % eggshell, and egg specific gravity
Treatment
Egg
weight
Egg
mass
Eggshell
thickness
% eggshell
Specific
gravity
0
61.96
46.60c
0.44b
8.8
1.083
10
60.87
52.81a
0.43b
8.84
1.083
20
62.21
51.73a
0.46a
8.58
1.083
30
62.17
50.08b
0.43b
8.42
1.081
40
61.40
48.79b
0.46a
8.61
1.083
50
61.47
47.57bc
0.46a
8.52
1.082
CV (%)
3.47
3.81
2.66
3.53
3.09
Probability
0.39
0.0018
0.15
0.34
0.18
Significant differences (P<0.05) among means as per Tukey's test.
Body temperature evaluations showed that, at the water inclusion levels analyzed, no effect was observed of moist diet on body temperature in commercial layers (Table 4). The poultry industry has experienced major transformations in recent years. Modern layers are now more precocious and feed efficiency has improved, resulting in larger amounts of eggs with lesser feed intakes. Therefore, nutritionists have looked at new nutritional alternatives aiming to fulfill bird requirements through adequate feeding management practices. The use of moist or even fluid diets in swine has become more and more popular in recent years. Nevertheless, this practice in poultry has been limited and, in addition, only scarce information exists with this regard in commercial layers. In accordance with Yalda and Forbes (1995), and Forbes (2003) the use of moist feed in birds can play an important role both nutritionally and economically by reducing feed cost due to improved nutrient utilization.
Table 4. Body temperatures of commercial layers fed a moist diet during 56 days
Treatment
Comb oC
Back oC
Legs oC
Rectal Temp. oC
0
33.50
27.35
27.85
41.00
10
33.55
27.40
28.30
40.85
20
33.30
27.25
27.45
41.05
30
33.70
27.15
27.25
41.00
40
33.70
27.40
28.30
41.00
50
33.50
27.20
27.90
41.10
CV (%)
2.06
1.54
3.17
4.03
Probability
0.47
0.17
0.36
0.41
Significant differences (P<0.05) among means as per Tukey's test.
Conclusion
This research demonstrated that feed physical form, resulting from the inclusion of various water levels, is a viable alternative for commercial layers. Moist feed resulted in improved animal performance and increased egg production.
Bibliography
Araujo LF. 2003. Nutrição pós-closão: aspectos teóricos e práticos. In: Simpósio sobre Nutrição de Aves e Suínos. Anais ... Campinas.
Forbes JM. 2003. Wetfood for poultry. Avianan Poultry Biology Rewies 14(4):175-193.
Gama SNMQ, Togashi CK, Ferreira NT, Buim MR, Guastalli EL, Fiagá DAM. 2008. Conhecendo a água utilizada para aves de produção. Biológico 70:43-49.
Moreng RE & Avéns JS. 1990. Ciência e produção de aves. São Paulo, Roca. 380 p.
Rostagno HS. 2005. Tabelas Brasileiras para Aves e Suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. Editora UFV. Viçosa, MG. 141 p.
SAS Institute Corporation. 2001 SAS User's Guide: Estatistics. 9.ed. Cary: SAS Institute.
Yahav S, Shinder D, Razpakovski V, Rusal M, Bar A. 2000. Lack of response of laying hens to relative humidity at high ambient temperature. British Poultry Science 41:660-663.
Yalda AY & Forbes JM. 1995. Food intake and growth in chickens given food in the wet form with and without access to drinking water. British Poultry Science 36:357-369.
 
 
Content from the event:
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Dr. Algis Martínez
Dr. Algis Martínez
Cargill
Cargill
DVM, Diplomado ACPV - Poultry Veterinarian North America Cargill
United States
Shivaram Rao
Shivaram Rao
Pilgrim´s
PhD Director Principal de Nutrición y Servicios Técnicos de Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
United States
Carolina Hall
Carolina Hall
Trouw Nutrition
United States