/  
  /  

internal teat sealant

Efficacy of an internal teat sealant in the prevention of clinical mastitis ocurring in the first 100 days in milk

Published on: 05/21/2012
Author/s : Martin Pol (Lactodiagnostico Sur), Salvador Bonfati (Pfizer)
(376)
(0)
(0)
(0)

New intramammary infections are frequent during dry period. Incomplete or delayed formation of keratin plug in the streak canal has been proposed as risk factors for new intramammary infections. A significant number of intramammary infection acquired during the dry period are likely to develop mastitis in the subsequent lactation. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of infusing with an internal teat sealant at dry-off used as an adjunct to long-acting antibiotic infusion at dry-off, on the risk of experiencing a clinical mastitis event between parturition and 100 days in milk (DIM).

Materials and Methods

Data was obtained from a commercial free-stall Holstein dairy herd in Argentina. Cows were producing on average 34 L (75 lbs) per day. To be eligible for enrollment, cows have to have 4 functional quarters and no clinical mastitis at dry-off, have an expected dry period between 21 and 75 days and have received no parenteral antibiotic treatment at dry-off or during the dry period. Individual somatic cell count was not considered for enrollment. Following the last milking all four quarters were abruptly dry treated with an intramammary infusion containing 500 mg of cloxacillin (benzathine). Immediately after, two contralateral quarters (LF/RH) were treated with an internal teat sealant (TeatSeal, Pfizer). The alternate two contralateral quarters (RF/LH) were considered control quarters. After drying the cows, all four teats were dipped with a 1% iodine-based antiseptic.

Dry cows were housed in dry lots until calving. Cows were moved to a maternity pen hours before calving. Cows were then moved into a lactating-cow pen. Milking procedures include forestripping and examination for abnormal milk at each milking (3 times per day). Clinical mastitis was defined as abnormal milk with or without local inflammation and clinical cases were diagnosed by milkers. A 21-day gap was used to consider a new clinical case. Chi-square analysis was used to study association of treatment at dry off with clinical mastitis events between parturition and 100 DIM. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistix 8.0 and significance level was set at 0.05.

Results

Of 260 cows initially enrolled, 239 completed the study. Dry-off dates ranged June 6, 2010 to September 30, 2010. Dry-off length average was 47.8 days (Min=23, Max=72; SD=7.7). Causes for cows to be omitted from final analysis included shorter dry period (5 cows), longer dry period (9 cows), or deaths (not associated to mastitis) during the study (7 cows). The proportion of quarters with a clinical event between parturition and 100 DIM was significantly lower for treated (4.4%) compared to controls (8.4%) (P<0.05) (Figure1). Three clinical cases resulted in non functional quarters in the teat sealant group while 8 clinical cases resulted in blind quarters in the control group.

Figure 1: Number of quarters with a clinical mastitis event between parturition and 100 DIM.

Clinical cases occurred earlier in lactation for control quarters (Mean= 40.9 days, SD= 27.2) compared to quarters treated with internal teat sealant (Mean= 42.7 days, SD=34.2). Economic evaluation of the use of teat sealant was studied considering discarded milk, treatment cost and production losses due to non functional quarters and due to clinical mastitis effect on lactation curve (Table 1). Cost benefit ratio of including teat sealant during the dry period was estimated in 1:5.

Table 1. Partial budget estimation of economic benefits after including internal teat sealants to conventional dry therapy. All values are expressed in liters of milk and based in 239 animals.

(376)
(0)
(0)
(0)





Would you like to discuss about this topic: Efficacy of an internal teat sealant in the prevention of clinical mastitis ocurring in the first 100 days in milk?
Engormix.com reserves the right to delete and/or modify comments. See more details

Comments that contain the following items won´t be published:

  • Repeated spelling mistakes.
  • Advertisements, Web sites and/or e-mail addresses.
  • Questions or answers not relevant to the topic discussed in the Forum.
Videos (2)
 
Introduction Looking for one change in a cow's udder health status may not g...
 
Proper dairy herd management should be designed to optimize the production of h...
Forums (33)
Hello Elena You are requested to read the article " Pathobilogy, etiology and n...
 
are there any advantage mastitis vaccine program about reducing scc in cattle? ...
Professional Services
Dr.arslan Arif Dr.arslan Arif
Torrance, California, Estados Unidos de América
Brian Sievert Brian Sievert
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
Mike officer Mike officer
Weldon Spring Heights, Missouri, United States of America
Robert G. Kennedy Robert G. Kennedy
Kingsburg, California, Estados Unidos de América
    |     Who are we?     |     Contact
Copyright © 1999-2013 Engormix.com - All Rights Reserved